不同估算方法与监测频率对氮磷负荷估算的影响OACHSSCD
The influence of different estimation methods and monitoring frequencies on the estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus loads and emission intensity:a case study of irrigation districts in Ningxia
为提高宁夏引黄灌区农田排水沟污染物通量的估算精度并优化监测方案,本研究以第五排水沟为对象,基于其 2022-2023 年逐日流量与总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)浓度数据,系统分析了 5 种监测频率(1 周 3 次、1 周 1 次、2 周 1 次、3 周 1 次、4 周 1次)与 8 种通量估算方法对年通量估算结果的影响.结果表明:对于 TN 年通量估算,采用 3 周 1 次的监测频率并结合LOADEST 模型,可获得可靠的结果;而对于 TP 年通量,最佳方法为"流量加权平均浓度法",其最适宜的监测频率为 2 周 1 次.此外,在灌溉期采用高频监测能够提高估算精度,1 周 3 次的采样频率最佳;同时,线性插值法是估算灌溉期 TN 通量的最优方法,而浓度曲线法更适用于灌溉期 TP 通量的估算.研究表明,根据污染物种类和水文期制定差异化方案,可显著提高通量估算精度.本研究可为宁夏灌区水质监测网络的优化和污染物负荷的准确评估提供科学依据.
To determine the appropriate monitoring frequency and estimation method,improve the accuracy of estimating the flux of river pollutants,and reduce the error of flux estimation,based on the daily flow and total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations of the Fifth drainage Ditch in the Ningxia Yellow River Diversion Irrigation District from 2022 to 2023,eight estimation methods were adopted,setting three times a week,once a week,once every two weeks,and once every three weeks.The annual fluxes of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the fifth drainage ditch were estimated at five sampling frequencies once every four weeks.The results showed that using a sampling frequency of once every three weeks and the LOADEST method to estimate the TN flux in the fifth drainage ditch can yielded relatively reliable estimation results.The method of the flow-weighted average concentration was the best way to estimate the TP flux in the fifth drainage ditch.Sampling once every two weeks was the most suitable frequency for TP estimation.It was necessary to estimate the TN and TP of the fifth drainage ditch during the irrigation period by using high-frequency monitoring frequencies.A sampling frequency of three times a week was the optimal sampling frequency.The linear interpolation method was the best method for estimating TN during the irrigation period,and the concentration curve method was the best method for estimating TP.
侯以展;张卫红;雷秋良;杜新忠;张天鹏;李影;韩增玉;孙源;刘宏斌
中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081宁夏回族自治区生态环境监测中心,银川 750002中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081宁夏回族自治区生态环境监测中心,银川 750002宁夏回族自治区生态环境监测中心,银川 750002中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所农业农村部面源污染控制重点实验室,北京昌平土壤质量国家野外科学观测研究站,北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081
通量估算总氮总磷LOADEST监测频率不确定性宁夏灌区
flux estimationtotal nitrogentotal phosphorusLOADESTmonitoring frequencyuncertaintyNingxia irrigation district
《生态学报》 2026 (9)
4547-4558,12
国家重点研发计划课题(2024YFD1701304)国家自然科学基金区域创新发展联合基金(U20A20114)
评论