基于MRIO模型的产业转移与贸易隐含碳转移空间路径分析OACHSSCD
Comparison of the spatial paths between industrial transfer and carbon transfer implied by trade based on MRIO
基于多区域投入产出模型,从国内需求驱动和出口驱动两个角度出发对我国 2012 年、2015 年、2017 年不同区域间以及省际的产业转移与贸易隐含碳转移进行了测度,并比较分析了两者空间路径的联系与区别.结果表明:国内需求与出口分别驱动的区域间产业转移与贸易隐含碳转移,整体上均呈现出"由沿海向内陆、由南向北"的转移格局;在省际尺度上,这两类驱动下的产业转移与贸易隐含碳转移同样表现为由经济较发达的沿海地区向经济相对欠发达的内陆地区扩散,并伴随明显的"由南向北"转移趋势;无论是由国内需求驱动的还是由出口驱动的,产业转移与贸易隐含碳转移空间路径大体相似但并不完全一致.
Based on the multi-regional input-output model,industrial transfer and carbon transfer implied by trade between different regions and provinces driven by domestic demand and export in 2012,2015 and 2017 in China are measured respectively,and the connection and difference between the two spatial transfer paths are compared and analyzed.The results show that the inter-regional industrial transfer and carbon transfer implied by trade driven by domestic demand and export all showed a spatial pattern from coastal regions to inland regions and from south to north;the inter-provincial industrial transfer and carbon transfer implied by trade driven by domestic demand and export mainly showed a spatial pattern from economically developed coastal provinces to economically less developed inland provinces,from south to north;whether driven by domestic demand or export,industrial transfer and carbon transfer paths are similar but not completely consistent.This study can provide a theoretical basis for guiding the rational transfer of industries and carbon emissions implied by trade.
庞庆华;史艳花
河海大学经济与金融学院河海大学经济与金融学院
产业转移贸易隐含碳转移空间路径多区域投入产出模型
industrial transfercarbon transfer implied by tradespatial pathsmulti-regional input-output model
《水利经济》 2026 (3)
37-46,10
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(22YJAZH086)
评论