首页|期刊导航|热带地理|乐园与家园:普达措国家公园游客与社区居民空间正义感知与行为生成机制差异

乐园与家园:普达措国家公园游客与社区居民空间正义感知与行为生成机制差异OA

Paradise and Homeland:The Differences in Spatial Justice Perception and Behavior Formation Mechanisms between Tourists and Local Residents in Potatso National Park

中文摘要英文摘要

文章以普达措国家公园为案例,整合空间正义与计划行为理论,构建"空间正义感知—心理转化—行为生成"的理论框架.运用建构扎根理论的研究方法,解构个体的空间不正义感知,反向建构空间正义维度,进而剖析游客与社区居民在空间正义感知及行为生成机制上的差异.结果发现:1)游客与社区居民的空间正义感知体现在分配正义、程序正义、承认正义与修复正义4个维度.游客的空间不正义感知导致其发生空间价值感知失衡、空间规训冲突与空间能动性消解的心理转化,进而引发负面口碑、消极参与、现场索偿乃至违规冒险等行为反应;社区居民的空间不正义感知导致其发生空间生存挤压、空间认同撕裂与空间赋权剥夺的心理转化,进而引发抵制与不合作、集体行动、外部求援、隐性对抗和策略博弈等行为反应.2)双方在空间正义感知与行为模式上的差异,源于"游客的乐园"与"居民的家园"之间的深层场域张力.游客基于体验权遵循市场逻辑而行动,而社区居民基于生存权、发展权与文化权遵循权利逻辑而行动.双方在国家公园建设中的错位与碰撞,构成双方空间正义感知差异的起点,并通过不同路径传导和产生影响.

This study proposed a theoretical framework of"spatial justice perception-psychological transformation-behavior formation."Using multisource data,including semi-structured interviews,participatory observations,and secondary materials,the research applied a constructing grounded theory approach involving a four-level coding analysis:initial coding,focused coding,axial coding,and theoretical coding.By deconstructing individuals' perceptions of spatial injustice,this study reconstructed the dimensions of spatial justice and examined the differences in perceptions and behavioral mechanisms between tourists and local residents.The key findings are as follows:(1)Both tourists and residents derive their spatial justice perceptions from issues of spatial injustice,which are reconstructed in four core dimensions:distributive justice,procedural justice,recognition justice,and restorative justice.For tourists,the psychological transformation mechanism operates as follows:perceptions of distributive,recognition,and restorative injustice trigger disappointment in service value,alienation in the cultural experience,and a sense of lack of ecological education,leading to imbalanced spatial value perception.Perceptions of distributive and recognition injustice shape cognitive biases such as deviation from group preferences and a lack of cultural respect,resulting in conflicts with spatial discipline.Perceptions of distributive and restorative injustice weaken behavioral confidence and decision-making autonomy,causing diminished spatial agency.For residents,perceptions of distributive,recognition,and restorative injustice induce survival anxiety,cultural anxiety,increased economic burden,reinforced doubts about fairness,and a heightened sense of deprivation,leading to perceived spatial survival pressure.Perceptions of procedural injustice foster intergroup opposition,intensify value conflicts,and erode group trust,resulting in a torn spatial identity.Perceptions of procedural and restorative injustice jointly reduce decision autonomy and undermine developmental confidence,leading to reduced spatial empowerment.(2)Structural differences exist between tourists and residents in spatial justice perception and behavior,rooted in the profound tension between two spatial attributes—"paradise"vs"homeland"—and their respective subject positions.Tourists who occupy transient,consumption-oriented positions prioritize experiential rights.They often expressed dissatisfaction through negative word-of-mouth,passive participation,on-site compensation,or rule-breaking adventures.Their negative behaviors generate short-term public opinion and operational pressure,whereas their long-term effects can undermine destination attractiveness.Residents situated in fixed livelihood-dependent positions emphasize their rights to survival,development,and culture.They tend to adopt resistance measures,such as boycotts,collective action,external appeals,covert resistance,and strategic gaming.Their negative actions easily provoke governance conflicts and social risks,potentially undermining the legitimacy of governance in the long term.This study contributes theoretically by deconstructing differences in spatial justice perceptions between tourists and residents of Potatso National Park,and deepens the connotation of spatial justice theory in ecological conservation contexts,complementing existing research focused on urban development.Second,it innovatively proposes"restorative justice"as a key dimension in ecological conservation,defining it as"dismantling structural roots of injustice through systematic intervention to halt the reproduction of spatial conflicts and achieve sustainable reconciliation of eco-social relations."Finally,moving beyond macro-structural perspectives,this study constructed a micro-level analytical framework,offering new theoretical tools to analyze the psychological formation of spatial justice and advance national park governance.Practically,this study systematically identifies real-world issues in Potatso National Park's conservation and management,analyzes the underlying mechanisms,and proposes targeted,multi-dimensional governance strategies tailored to different stakeholders.This study provides concrete pathways for enhancing park governance effectiveness.

彭建;杨遥;谭学玲

中央民族大学管理学院,北京 100081中央民族大学管理学院,北京 100081||普洱学院经济管理学院,云南普洱 665000中央民族大学管理学院,北京 100081

资源环境

空间正义感知行为生成社区居民游客建构扎根理论普达措国家公园

spatial justice perceptionbehavioral formationlocal residentstouristsconstructing grounded theoryPotatso National Park

《热带地理》 2026 (5)

884-899,16

中央民族大学自主科研项目"交叉学科"研究专项(2024JCYJ14)

10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20250560

评论