CMA-MESO中不同云微物理方案对台风强降水的云宏、微观特征的模拟分析OA
Simulation analysis of cloud macro-micro features of typhoon heavy rainfall in CMA-MESO by different cloud microphysics schemes
使用中国气象局中尺度天气数值预报系统(CMA-MESO)对 2022 年 7 月初由台风"暹芭"登陆引起的一次广东省暴雨过程进行数值模拟.利用区域自动观测站、FY-2H 与 FY-4A 等卫星探测以及 ERA5 再分析资料、mosaic 雷达探测等多源数据,评估了 WSM6、Liu-Ma 及 Thompson 3个云微物理方案对此次暴雨过程中的降水及云宏、微观特征的模拟效果.结果表明:(1)不同方案均能较好地模拟日降水落区与中心位置,但模拟降水中心强度偏小且更加分散.(2)模拟云区范围偏大、总云量偏高,云粒子并不能有效到达地面形成降水,且模式对降水中心附近深厚对流云团的模拟存在误差.Liu-Ma 方案模拟的云内强对流较为稳定.(3)模式模拟雷达强回波区中心强度偏低,模拟回波系统移动滞后.反映了 CAM-MESO 模式对冰相过程的模拟存在一定误差.Thompson 方案模拟雪粒子数量偏多使其 5 dBZ 以下回波模拟范围明显大于探测数据.(4)不同方案模拟液态水凝物含量存在明显差异.Liu-Ma 方案在降水中心区域内较多的云水能够为冰粒子转化提供有利条件.Thompson 方案冰相粒子含量的失衡导致该方案对强对流中心模拟效果较差.总的来说,对于台风等内部存在极强对流的降水个例,Liu-Ma 方案对日降水、总云量及亮温的模拟结果与观测及再分析数据吻合较好.Thompson 方案在多项云特征与降水的模拟中均不占优.
This study employs the CMA-MESO model to investigate a torrential rainfall event associated with Typhoon Siam's landfall in Guangdong Province in early July 2022.Three cloud microphysical schemes(WSM6,Liu-Ma,and Thompson)implemented in the CMA-MESO model were evaluated through comparative analysis of precipitation patterns and cloud microphysical characteristics,utilizing observational data from regional automatic weather stations,satellite observations(FY-2H and FY-4A),ERA5 reanalysis data,and mosaic radar composites.Key findings include:(1)all schemes demonstrate reasonable capability in reproducing the spatial distribution of rainfall areas and precipitation center locations,though the simulated 24-hour cumulative precipitation exhibited excessive spatial diffusion compared to observations.(2)Systematic overestimation of total cloud cover was observed across all schemes,suggesting potential deficiencies in hydrometeor sedimentation processes that hindered effective precipitation formation.Particularly,simulations of deep convective clouds near the precipitation center displayed notable discrepancies,with the Liu-Ma scheme exhibiting relatively stable representation of convective intensity.(3)Radar reflectivity analysis revealed underestimation of strong echo core intensities and temporal lag in echo system propagation.Comparative evaluation suggests potential limitations in ice-phase process parameterizations for CMA-MESO,with Thompson's excessive snow production resulting in substantially overestimated echo below 5 dBZ.(4)Significant inter-scheme variations emerged in liquid hydrometeor distributions.The Liu-Ma scheme demonstrated superior ice-phase conversion efficiency through enhanced cloud water content in precipitation cores,while Thompson's imbalanced ice-phase partitioning adversely affected its convective core representation.The comprehensive evaluation reveals that for typhoon-related extreme convective precipitation events,the Liu-Ma scheme achieves optimal performance in daily precipitation accumulation,total cloud cover,and brightness temperature simulations,whereas the Thompson scheme shows systematic deficiencies in cloud microphysical representation and precipitation characteristics.
程佳佳;徐国强;赵婥
安徽省气象台,合肥 230000中国气象局 地球系统数值预报中心,北京 100081天津海洋中心气象台,天津 300000
天文与地球科学
云微物理方案CMA-MESO模式暴雨数值模拟
cloud microphysics schemesCMA-MESO modelrainstormnumerical simulation
《气象科学》 2026 (2)
113-125,13
国家自然科学基金资助项目(42175167U2142213)中国气象局能力提升联合研究专项资助项目(22NLTSZ006)中国沙漠气象科学研究基金资助项目(Sqj2023022)
评论