20世纪中叶以来AMOC的变化趋势与未来稳定性——进展与展望OA
The evolution and future stability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation since the mid-20th century:a review and outlook
大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)作为全球气候系统的关键组成部分,是一个具有多稳态特征的气候临界要素,其变化深刻影响着全球热量和水汽的再分配.由于直接观测记录很短,目前对20世纪中叶以来AMOC变化趋势的认识存在显著分歧:基于统计关联建立的AMOC"指纹"序列指示AMOC显著减弱,而基于环流强度变化产生的影响以及基于物理原理推导的AMOC大多显示无显著变化趋势.这种差异凸显了不同重建方法的内在局限以及自然变率可能的掩盖效应.文中系统梳理了早期预警信号和模式模拟等多维度证据,指出尽管多模式集合结果表明AMOC将在21世纪持续减弱(高信度),但其减弱幅度仍存在较大不确定性.同时,不同模式对AMOC临界点的模拟结果差异显著,尽管部分模式在理论上证实了临界点存在的可能性,但在现实气候中发生的具体时间仍极难确定.此外,气候系统内部存在的负反馈机制亦可能在一定程度上稳定AMOC.综合来看,AMOC未来最可能的演变路径是在持续减弱的总体趋势下,叠加一个目前难以量化但不可忽视的突变风险.为突破当前认知瓶颈,如早期预警信号的"假阳性"风险、气候模式模拟现代过程的偏差,以及冰盖融化等关键过程缺失带来的预估偏差,未来研究亟需在以下方面持续努力:扩展直接观测阵列、改进气候模式(特别是通过耦合冰盖动力学以更真实地反映淡水强迫)、开展先验分析和"古今类比"研究、探索机器学习等新方法以优化重建与预警,以及深化气候系统级联研究等.这些工作将为降低AMOC未来演变预估的不确定性、支撑气候风险评估提供关键科学依据.
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation(AMOC),a key component of the global climate system,behaves as a typical climate tipping element with multi-stable states.Changes in AMOC instigate a series of cascading effects,profoundly affecting distributions of heat and moisture globally.Up till now,due to relatively short durations of direct observations from monitoring arrays(e.g.,RAPID array(21 years)and OSNAP array(11 years)),our understanding of the evolution of the AMOC since the mid-20th century remains highly controversial.Fingerprint reconstructions based on sea-surface temperature and salinity proxies show a marked AMOC weakening since the mid-to-late 20th century,whereas estimates derived from the impacts of circulation intensity changes as well as those based on physical principles—such as ocean-atmosphere heat fluxes or sea surface height gradients—mostly show no significant trend.Additionally,although some metrics may also be able to characterize the AMOC variability,they are generally difficult to robustly assess the long-term trends due to data limitations(e.g.,resolution of sedimentary records and measurement uncertainties)and specific processing methods(e.g.,the detrending applied to sea-level gradient indices).These discrepancies underscore the inherent limitations of different reconstruction methods,and/or the potential masking effects of the natural variability. Regarding future changes in the AMOC,while multi-model ensembles project with high confidence that the AMOC will weaken persistently over the rest of 21st century,the degree of this weakening remains highly uncertain.Furthermore,substantial discrepancies are apparent among different models:although some modeling studies indicate the theoretical existence of a future AMOC tipping point,the timing of such an event in the real climate system remains extremely uncertain.On the other hand,potential negative feedback mechanisms in the climate system could have a stabilizing effect on the AMOC,but this is difficult to assess assuredly.Overall,the most plausible scenario for the future AMOC evolution would be a continued weakening trend,accompanied by an unquantifiable yet non-negligible risk of abrupt transition.To address the knowledge gaps that are critical in the field,such as the outstanding issues concerning potential false positives in early warning signals,the model biases in simulating modern climate processes,and projection biases caused by the missing of key processes including ice-sheet melting,future research should focus on the following priorities.(1)Expand direct observation arrays to enhance the spatiotemporal coverage.(2)Improve climate models,particularly by incorporating ice-sheet processes,to enhance the ability to simulate abrupt climate transitions.(3)Integrate Bayesian statistical frameworks to explicitly incorporate the prior probability for the existence of tipping points and to quantify the risk of abrupt transition through likelihood ratio analysis.(4)Promote research on"past-present analog"in the early warning analysis to understand modern signals in the context of paleoclimate resemblances,thereby improving prediction reliability.(5)Deepen our understanding of the cascades in response to changes in AMOC by reconstructing high-resolution geological records from key regions beyond the North Atlantic,thus providing more evidence for assessing the stability of the climate system.This represents a novel approach to infer AMOC stability through cascading responses to AMOC changes from other climate systems.However,caution is usually required for such an approach,as the coupling could potentially undermine the reliability of early warning signals.(6)Improve machine learning approaches to identify complex nonlinear patterns and early warning signals of AMOC stability from multi-source data,thereby helping to distinguish true critical slowdowns from data-artifact"false positives",predicting rate-induced tipping points under noisy conditions,and identifying underlying physical drivers.These efforts are crucial for reducing uncertainties in future AMOC projections—a vital part of global climate risk assessment.
董西瑀;陈日水;张旭;石正国;程海
西安交通大学全球环境变化研究院,西安 710049西安交通大学全球环境变化研究院,西安 710049西安交通大学全球环境变化研究院,西安 710049||Ice Dynamics and Palaeoclimate,British Antarctic Survey,Cambridge CB3 0ET,United Kingdom西安交通大学全球环境变化研究院,西安 710049||中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土科学全国重点实验室,西安 710061西安交通大学全球环境变化研究院,西安 710049||中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土科学全国重点实验室,西安 710061
大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)气候突变临界点早期预警
Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation(AMOC)Abrupt climate changeTipping pointEarly warning
《气候变化研究进展》 2026 (2)
137-149,13
国家自然科学基金项目(423B2204)科技部国家重点研发计划(2023YFF0805200)
评论