舆论博弈中的经验识解与知识建构OACHSSCD

[Purpose]Issues such as the difficulty of identifying false statements and the setting of one's agenda by opposing forces are common in public opinion gaming.Current research,however,often remains confined to surface-level discourse analysis,lacking a sys-tematic interpretation of the in-depth mechanisms of meaning deconstruction and construction.This hinders the identification of pathways to counter cognitive interference in public opinion communication and gaming.Based on the"experience"analysis perspective of social se-miotics and the interpretative pathways of systemic functional linguistics'transitivity theory for experiential construction,this study sorts out the hierarchical system of experiential semantics to construct a dynamic"construal-construction"semantic cycle analysis model.[Meth-od]The study adopts an approach combining hierarchical semantic analysis with reverse discourse construction.Relying on the framework of experiential semantic hierarchies,it deconstructs adversarial discourse in a bottom-up manner according to the sequence"element-figure-sequence/episode-discourse".Subsequently,reverse discourse construction is carried out from the levels of cultural context,situational context,semantic field,to lexicogrammar,forming an embedded and targeted knowledge system.The model is empirically tested using a corpus of U.S.think tank reports.[Result/Conclusion]The study indicates that the essence of public opinion gaming is a symbolic war for public cognition,where victory or defeat depends on which discourse more successfully weaves strategic intentions into the shared expe-riential structures of the social network.The analytical model proposed in this study facilitates achieving a logical closure from experiential construal to knowledge construction in public opinion gaming.The"construal"model is used for critically analyzing the deep semantic mechanisms of adversarial narratives,while the"construction"model is suitable for systematic knowledge production and agenda-setting.This study attempts to provide an operable linguistic pathway for revealing the mechanisms of discursive experiential manipulation and guiding proactive knowledge production.