首页|期刊导航|情报杂志|反恐人工智能应用的人权风险、全球治理赤字及应对

反恐人工智能应用的人权风险、全球治理赤字及应对OACHSSCD

Human Rights Risks,Rules Deficits in Global Governance,and Responses in the Application of AI in the Field of Counter-Terrorism

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]针对反恐人工智能应用这一新兴全球安全议题,研究人工智能技术嵌入反恐领域可能引发的人权风险,分析反恐人工智能应用的全球治理现状及其赤字,并提出应对路径和措施.[方法]锚定国家反恐权力扩张与人权保障的张力这一核心关系,遵循"风险识别—治理解构—协同应对"三维框架,首先,运用场景化分析方法,识别反恐人工智能应用的人权风险;其次,运用规范分析、比较分析方法,解析反恐人工智能应用全球治理现状及其赤字;最后,运用规范建构方法,提出反恐人工智能应用全球治理赤字的应对路径和措施.[结果/结论]反恐人工智能应用会对隐私权、平等和不受歧视权、言论自由权和公正审判权等人权带来严重干预.全球范围反恐人工智能应用治理存在硬法缺位、碎片化的赤字状态.完善反恐人工智能应用的全球治理,一方面,应构建以人权保障为基础的反恐人工智能硬法治理机制国;另一方面,应充分发挥联合国、欧洲人权法院、欧洲法院以及中国的作用,推动形成反恐人工智能全球治理共识.

[Purpose]In response to the emerging global security issue of artificial intelligence(AI)applications in counter-terrorism,this study examines the human rights risks that may arise from the integration of AI technologies into counter-terrorism practices,analyzes the current state and deficits of global governance in counter-terrorism AI applications,and proposes corresponding pathways and measures to address these challenges.[Method]Anchored in the core tension between the expansion of state counter-terrorism powers and the protec-tion of human rights,this study follows a three-dimensional framework of ″risk identification-governance deconstruction-coordinated re-sponse″.First,it employs a scenario-based analytical approach to identify the human rights risks associated with the application of AI in counter-terrorism.Second,through normative and comparative analyses,it examines the current state of global governance of counter-ter-rorism AI applications and identifies existing governance deficits.Finally,using a normative construction approach,the study proposes pathways and measures to address these global governance deficits in the application of AI to counter-terrorism.[Result/Conclusion]The application of counter-terrorism AI poses severe infringements on human rights such as the right to privacy,the right to equality and non-discrimination,the right to freedom of expression,and the right to a fair trial.The global governance of counter-terrorism AI applica-tions is in a deficit state characterized by the absence of hard law and fragmentation.To improve the global governance of counter-terror-ism AI applications,on the one hand,a hard-law governance mechanism for counter-terrorism AI based on human rights protection should be constructed;on the other hand,the roles of the United Nations,the European Court of Human Rights,the Court of Justice of the European Union and China should be fully exerted to promote the formation of a global governance consensus on counter-terrorism AI.

吴常青;李奕霖

天津商业大学法学院 天津 300134天津商业大学法学院 天津 300134

信息技术与安全科学

国家安全反恐人工智能人权全球治理规则赤字

national securitycounter-terrorismartificial intelligencehuman rightsglobal governancerule deficit

《情报杂志》 2026 (6)

56-65,10

国家社会科学基金项目"情报治理体系和治理能力现代化视域下大规模监控监督制约问题研究"(编号:20BTQ057)研究成果.

10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2026.06.008

评论