基于集合变换方法的华北冬季降雪过程的高分辨率集合预报试验比较研究OA
Comparative study of high-resolution ensemble forecasting for winter snowfall events in North China based on the ensemble transform method
以探索高分辨率集合预报初值扰动构建方法为目标,实现了集合变换(ensemble transform,ET)初值扰动方法在中国气象局自主研发区域数值预报系统(China Meteoro-logical Administration Mesoscale Model,CMA-MESO)的应用,并与已有多尺度混合(multi-scale blending,MSB)初值扰动方法对比,开展了华北地区冬季高影响天气过程的连续试验.针对初始扰动的误差增长特征分析表明,两种初始扰动方案的高分辨率区域集合预报均能较好捕捉到不同尺度扰动信息,主要模态结构和扰动振幅适当,方案总体合理,生成的扰动场在中小尺度扰动部分都有较高的动能谱能量,高层扰动动能谱能量随时间均呈现增长趋势,而扰动总能量都表现出从低层到高层先增后减的特点;差别在于 ET方法初始时刻小尺度扰动信息较多,增加了扰动波谱能量.统计检验显示,ET 方法对不同等压面、不同要素的预报能力相较于MSB 方法总体有提高.天气学检验也表明,两种方法对华北降水的落区、走向和强度预报效果相似,对复杂地形条件下山地站点地面要素预报具有参考价值.此外,ET 方法的计算效率高,具备业务预报应用潜力.
Improving initial perturbation techniques for convection-scale ensemble forecasting is essential for ad-vancing operational numerical weather prediction in China.To explore effective approaches for constructing initial perturbations in high-resolution ensemble systems,this study implements the ensemble transform(ET)method within the China Meteorological Administration Mesoscale Model(CMA-MESO),a regional numerical prediction system independently developed by the China Meteorological Administration.A series of continuous ex-periments was conducted for winter high-impact snowfall events over North China,and the results were compared with those obtained using the multi-scale blending(MSB)perturbation method.The results reveal distinct physical characteristics of convection-scale perturbation fields generated by the two methods.Analyses of error growth indicate that both schemes effectively capture multiscale perturbation information,with reasonable struc-tures and amplitudes of dominant modes,demonstrating the overall reliability of the ensemble configurations.The perturbation fields exhibit enhanced kinetic energy at meso-and small-scales,and the spectral energy of upper-level perturbations increases with forecast lead time.In both schemes,total perturbation energy first increases and then decreases from the lower to the upper troposphere.The ET method produces higher initial perturbation energy than the MSB method,while the two methods show comparable energy levels at later forecast times.This differ-ence is likely attributable to the ET method's ability to incorporate more localized small-scale perturbations,there-by enhancing the perturbation energy spectrum and improving the representation of the initial dynamical field for short-range ensemble forecasts.However,the lack of spatial filtering in the ET method introduces additional noise,leading to excessive initial perturbation energy,which warrants further refinement.Statistical verification demon-strates that the ET method generally outperforms the MSB method in forecasting meteorological variables at mul-tiple pressure levels.Within a 24 h forecast period,the ET scheme yields lower continuous ranked probability scores(CRPS)and reduced forecast errors for geopotential height and temperature in the middle and upper tropo-sphere as well as for surface variables,indicating improved probabilistic forecast skill.Unlike previous studies fo-cused primarily on warm-season precipitation,this work specifically evaluates model performance for winter snowfall events.Synoptic verification shows that both schemes perform comparably in predicting snowfall distribu-tion and intensity over North China.Notably,the ET method provides more reliable forecasts of surface tempera-ture and wind at mountainous stations,highlighting its advantages in complex terrain.Additionally,the ET method demonstrates higher computational efficiency,supporting its potential application in rapid-update cycling and stable operation within future high-resolution operational ensemble forecasting systems.
戴玲玲;邓国;周玉淑;陈静;庄照荣;刘娟
滁州市气象局,安徽 滁州 239000中国气象局地球系统数值预报中心,北京 100081||灾害天气科学与技术全国重点实验室,北京 100081||中国气象局地球系统数值预报重点开放实验室,北京 100081||国家气象中心,北京 100081中国科学院 大气物理研究所 云降水物理与强风暴实验室,北京 100029||中国科学院大学,北京 100049中国气象局地球系统数值预报中心,北京 100081||灾害天气科学与技术全国重点实验室,北京 100081||中国气象局地球系统数值预报重点开放实验室,北京 100081中国气象局地球系统数值预报中心,北京 100081||灾害天气科学与技术全国重点实验室,北京 100081||中国气象局地球系统数值预报重点开放实验室,北京 100081南京市浦口区气象局,江苏 南京 211899
区域集合预报初值扰动集合变换方法多尺度混合降雪预报
regional ensemble forecastinginitial perturbationsensemble transform methodmulti-scale blendingsnowfall forecasting
《大气科学学报》 2026 (3)
442-458,17
国家自然科学基金项目(4247516942175012)科技冬奥专项(2018YFF0300103)
评论