中外托育研究热点及趋势的比较分析OACHSSCD
Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends in Early Childhood Education and Care in China and Abroad:A CiteSpace-Based Visualization Study
为解决0-3岁早期教育托育服务领域研究碎片化问题,响应"三孩政策"与"幼有所育"国家战略需求,本研究以2009-2025年中国知网(CNKI)核心期刊文献(449篇)与美国科学网(WOS)核心合集文献(1425篇)为样本,运用文献计量法与CiteSpace可视化技术,从发文趋势、关键词聚类、高被引文献等维度,对比分析中外托育服务研究的热点与演化路径.研究发现,国外托育研究呈"长期积累、稳步升级"特征,历经基础建设期(2009-2015年)与质量深化期(2016-2025年),聚焦服务质量评估、多元主体协同、儿童发展长期效应,以混合研究法与国际协作网络为特色;国内研究受政策驱动显著,2019年后进入爆发期,呈现"前期蛰伏、后期增长"态势,核心议题集中于普惠托育供给、政策协同落实、托育体系构建,但存在研究视角单一、理论基础薄弱、跨学科融合不足等问题.中外研究共性在于均关注托育服务公共属性与质量提升,差异体现在"宏观政策—微观个体""民生保障—全人发展"的导向分野.基于此,未来需深化中国特色托育理论构建,拓展薄弱研究议题,创新研究方法,强化政策实践融合,以推动托育服务体系规范化、专业化发展,为落实人口发展战略提供理论与实践支撑.
To address the fragmentation of research in the field of early childhood education and care(ECEC)services for children aged 0-3,and respond to the national strategic demands of the"Three-Child Policy"and"Ensuring Access to Quality Early Childhood Education,"this study takes 449 core journal articles from CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure)and 1,425 core collection docu-ments from Web of Science(WOS)published between 2009 and 2025 as research samples.Employing bibliometric methods and CiteSpace visualization technology,it conducts a comparative analysis of the re-search hotspots and evolutionary paths of ECEC services in China and abroad from dimensions including publication trends,keyword clustering,and highly cited literature.The findings reveal that international ECEC research exhibits characteristics of"long-term accumulation and steady upgrading,"undergoing two phases:the foundation construction period(2009-2015)and the quality deepening period(2016-2025).It focuses on service quality evaluation,multi-stakeholder collaboration,and the long-term effects of early childhood development,featuring mixed research methods and international collaborative networks.In contrast,domestic research is significantly driven by policies,entering an explosive growth phase after 2019 with a development pattern of"early dormancy and late-stage expansion."Core re-search topics concentrate on inclusive ECEC supply,policy coordination and implementation,and ECEC system construction.However,domestic research faces challenges such as a single research perspective,weak theoretical foundations,and insufficient interdisciplinary integration.The common ground between Chinese and international research lies in their shared focus on the public nature of ECEC services and quality improvement,while the differences manifest in the orientation divergence between"macro policy-micro individual"and"livelihood security-holistic development."Based on these findings,future re-search should deepen the construction of ECEC theories with Chinese characteristics,expand underdevel-oped research themes,innovate research methodologies,and strengthen the integration of policy and practice.Such efforts aim to promote the standardized and professional development of the ECEC service system,thereby providing theoretical and practical support for the implementation of national population development strategies.
王莉娟
四川民族学院,四川康定 626001
社会科学
0-3岁早期教育托育服务可视化分析CiteSpace
0-3-year-old early childhood educationchildcare servicesvisual analysisCiteSpace
《四川民族学院学报》 2026 (2)
63-74,12
四川0-3岁儿童早期发展与教育研究中心课题"甘孜州0-3岁早期教育公共服务需求与供给现状及对策研究"(SCLS202411)2022年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金西部和边疆地区项目"乡村振兴背景下四川民族地区'一村一幼'延续与发展路径研究"(22XJA880001)
评论