针康法结合低频电刺激治疗对脑卒中后足下垂患者下肢功能康复的影响OA
Effect of acupuncture-rehabilitation therapy combined with low-frequency electrical stimulation treatment on lower limb functional rehabilitation in patients with post-stroke foot drop
目的 探讨针康法结合低频电刺激治疗对脑卒中后足下垂患者下肢功能康复的影响.方法 选择2021年6月至2024年6月黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院收治的99例脑卒中后足下垂患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将患者分为联合组、低频电刺激组、针康法组,每组33例.所有患者均接受常规药物治疗,低频电刺激组在常规药物治疗的基础上接受低频电刺激治疗,针康法组在常规药物治疗的基础上接受针康法治疗,联合组在常规药物治疗基础上同时接受低频电刺激治疗及针康法治疗.3组均持续治疗4周.比较3组治疗后足下垂改善情况;比较治疗前、治疗后3组肌张力[采用改良 Ashworth痉挛量表(MAS)评价]、下肢运动功能[采用简化Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)评估]、踝关节活动度(ROM,采用量角器测量)、步态稳定性(步频、步幅、患侧摆动相、患侧支持相)、步行能力[采用功能性步行量表(FAC)评估]、痉挛程度[采用临床痉挛指数(CSI)评估]、平衡功能[采用 Berg平衡量表(BBS)评估],以及治疗期间不良反应发生情况.结果 治疗后,联合组、低频电刺激组、针康法组足下垂改善的优良率分别为96.97%、78.79%、75.76%,联合组足下垂改善的优良率高于低频电刺激组、针康法组(P<0.05),而低频电刺激组、针康法组间足下垂改善的优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后联合组 MAS分级低于低频电刺激组、针康法组,FMA评分、ROM 高于低频电刺激组、针康法组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后低频电刺激组、针康法组 MAS分级、FMA评分、ROM 比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).与低频电刺激组、针康法组相比,治疗后联合组的步频加快、步幅增大、患侧摆动相延长、患侧支持相缩短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后低频电刺激组与针康法组的步频、步幅、患侧摆动相、患侧支持相比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后联合组CSI评分低于低频电刺激组、针康法组,FAC、BBS评分高于低频电刺激组、针康法组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后低频电刺激组、针康法组CSI、FAC、BBS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗期间,联合组、低频电刺激组、针康法组不良反应总发生率分别为12.12%、9.09%、6.06%,3组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 针康法结合低频电刺激治疗可有效提高脑卒中后足下垂患者踝关节活动范围、步态稳定 性,改善下肢运动功能,降低肌张力水平,减少踝关节痉挛,调节平衡功能,促进步行功能恢复,疗效显著.
Objective To explore the effect of acupuncture rehabilitation therapy combined with low-fre-quency electrical stimulation treatment on the lower limb functional rehabilitation in the patients with post-stroke foot drop.Methods A total of 99 patients with post-stroke foot drop admitted and treated in the Sec-ond Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to June 2024 were selected as the research subjects.The patients were divided into the combined group,low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group according to the random number table meth-od,33 cases in each group.All patients received the conventional drug treatment.The low-frequency electrical stimulation group received the low-frequency electrical stimulation treatment on the basis of conventional drug treatment,the acupuncture rehabilitation group received the acupuncture rehabilitation treatment on the basis of conventional drug treatment,and the combined group simultaneously received both low-frequency electrical stimulation treatment and acupuncture rehabilitation treatment on the basis of conventional drug treatment.The three groups were persistently treated for 4 weeks.The improvement situation of foot drop after treat-ment,muscle tone[evaluated by the Modified Ashworth Scale(MAS)],lower limb motor function[assessed by the simplified Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment Scale(FMA)],ankle joint range of motion(ROM,measured by goniometer),gait stability(step frequency,step length,swing phase of the affected side,support phase of the affected side),walking ability[assessed by the Functional Ambulation Category(FAC)scale],spasticity degree[assessed by the Clinical Spasticity Index(CSI)scale],and balance function[assessed by the Berg Balance Scale(BBS)scale]before and after treatment,as well as the occurrence of adverse reactions dur-ing treatment were compared among the three groups.Results After treatment,the excellent and good rates of improvement in foot drop in the combined group,low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupunc-ture rehabilitation group were 96.97%,78.79%and 75.76%,respectively.The excellent and good rate of foot drop improvement in the combined group was higher than that in the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in the excellent and good rates of foot drop improvement between the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group(P>0.05).After treatment,the MAS grade in the combined group was lower than that in the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group,and the FMA score and ROM were higher than those in the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in the MAS grade,FMA score and ROM after treatment between the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group(P>0.05).Compared with the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group,the step frequency after treat-ment in the combined group was accelerated,stride length was increased,swing phase of the affected side was prolonged and support phase of the affected side was shortened,and the differences were statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in the step frequency,step length,swing phase of the affected side,and support phase of the affected side between the low-frequency electrical stimula-tion group and acupuncture rehabilitation group after treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the CSI score in the combined group was lower than that in the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture re-habilitation group,and the FAC and BBS scores were higher than those in the low-frequency electrical stimula-tion group and acupuncture rehabilitation group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in CSI,FAC,and BBS scores after treatment between the low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group(P>0.05).During treatment,the total incidence rates of adverse reactions in the combined group,low-frequency electrical stimulation group and acupuncture rehabilitation group was 12.12%,9.09%and 6.06%,respectively,with no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion The combination of acupuncture rehabilitation and low-frequency electri-cal stimulation could effectively increase the motion range of the ankle joint and gait stability,improve the lower limb motor function and reduce muscle tone level,reduce the ankle spasticity,regulate the balance func-tion,and promote the recovery of walking function in the patients with post-stroke foot drop with significant efficacy.
马晓东;袁洪超;李欣蔚
黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院康复医学一科,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院哈南分院疼痛康复一科,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150066黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院哈南分院疼痛康复一科,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150066
医药卫生
脑卒中足下垂针康法低频电刺激运动功能肌张力
strokefoot dropacupuncture therapylow-frequency electrical stimulationmotor functionmuscular tone
《检验医学与临床》 2026 (10)
1326-1333,8
黑龙江省中医药科研项目(ZHY2022-187).
评论