超声引导下局部注射甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠失败的预测因素及其风险分层分析OA
Predictors and risk stratification for treatment failure of ultrasound-guided local methotrexate injection in gestational sac-type cesarean scar pregnancy
目的 探讨甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗孕囊型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)失败的独立预测因素,构建并初步验证风险分层预测模型.方法 收集2014年1月-2025年6月在解放军总医院第一医学中心就诊的55例接受超声引导下局部注射MTX治疗的孕囊型CSP患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.根据治疗后是否需要手术干预,将患者分为药物治疗成功组(n=41)与药物治疗失败组(n=14).采用单因素及多因素logistic回归分析识别影响MTX局部治疗失败的独立预测因素,并据此构建风险分层模型.计算模型的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC),并采用Bootstrap法(1000次重复抽样)进行内部验证,评估模型的判别效能及其稳定性.结果 MTX治疗总成功率达74.5%(41/55).单因素分析结果显示,Jordans分型(P=0.036)、胎芽分组(P=0.008)、术前血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚单位(β-hCG)(P=0.009)及孕囊平均直径(P=0.026)与治疗失败明显相关.多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,Jordans Ⅱ型(OR=5.318,95%CI 1.030~27.446,P=0.046)及胎芽长度≥4.0 mm(OR=10.893,95%CI 2.233~53.138,P=0.003)是治疗失败的独立预测因素.据此将CSP患者分为3组:低危组(Jordans Ⅰ型+胎芽长度<4.0 mm)、中危组(Jordans Ⅰ型+胎芽长度≥4.0 mm或Jordans Ⅱ型+胎芽长度<4.0 mm)、高危组(Jordans Ⅱ型+胎芽长度≥4.0 mm).其中,低危组(n=26)实际失败率仅为3.8%(1/26),中危组(n=24)为25.0%(6/24),高危组(n=5)达80.0%(4/5).ROC分析显示模型具备中等的判别力(AUC=0.780),Bootstrap验证结果表明其稳定性较好[AUC均值为0.782(95%CI 0.632~0.904),AUC中位数为0.788(0.740,0.832)].结论 Jordans分型及胎芽长度是预测超声引导下局部MTX治疗孕囊型CSP失败的重要指标,基于此初步构建的风险分层模型可为CSP个体化治疗提供决策参考.
Objective To investigate the independent predictive factors for the failure of methotrexate(MTX)in treating gestational sac-type cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP),and to construct and preliminarily validate a risk stratification prediction model.Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with gestational sac-type CSP who underwent ultrasound-guided local MTX injection at the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital between January 2014 and June 2025 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into successful drug treatment group(n=41)and failed drug treatment group(n=14)according to whether surgical intervention was required after treatment.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictive factors for MTX treatment failure.A risk stratification model was constructed based on these predictors.The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve(AUC)was calculated,and internal validation was conducted using the Bootstrap method(1000 repeated samplings)to assess the discriminatory power and stability of the model.Results The overall success rate of MTX treatment was 74.5%(41/55).Univariate analysis showed significant associations between treatment failure and Jordans classification(P=0.036),embryonic bud grouping(P=0.008),preoperative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin(β-hCG)(P=0.009),and mean gestational sac diameter(P=0.026).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that Jordans type Ⅱ(OR=5.318,95%CI 1.030-27.446,P=0.046)and embryonic bud length≥4.0 mm(OR=10.893,95%CI 2.233-53.138,P=0.003)were independent predictive factors for treatment failure.Based on these results,CSP patients were stratified into three groups:low-risk group(Jordans type Ⅰ+embryonic bud length<4.0 mm),intermediate-risk group(Jordans type Ⅰ+embryonic bud length≥4.0 mm or Jordans type Ⅱ+embryonic bud length<4.0 mm),and high-risk group(Jordans type Ⅱ+embryonic bud length≥4.0 mm).The actual failure rate was 3.8%(1/26)in low-risk group(n=26),25.0%(6/24)in intermediate-risk group(n=24),and 80.0%(4/5)in high-risk group(n=5).ROC analysis demonstrated that the model had moderate discriminatory power(AUC=0.780),and Bootstrap validation confirmed good stability of the model with a mean AUC of 0.782(95%CI 0.632-0.904)and a median AUC of 0.788(0.740,0.832).Conclusions Jordans classification and embryonic bud length are important indicators for predicting the treatment failure of ultrasound-guided local MTX injection in gestational sac-type CSP.The preliminary risk stratification model based on these predictors provides a decision-making reference for the individualized treatment of CSP.
牛兴盼;闫如玉;徐虹
解放军医学院研究生院,北京 100853||解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853解放军医学院研究生院,北京 100853||解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853
医药卫生
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠甲氨蝶呤Jordans分型风险分层模型
gestational sac-type cesarean scar pregnancymethotrexateJordans classificationrisk stratification prediction model
《解放军医学杂志》 2026 (4)
553-559,7
This work was supported by the Military Family Planning Independent Research Project(22JSZ11) 军队计划生育自主科研项目(22JSZ11)
评论