首页|期刊导航|湖北体育科技|体育非物质文化遗产数字化的伦理审视

体育非物质文化遗产数字化的伦理审视OA

Ethical Review of the Digitalization of Sports Intangible Cultural Heritage

中文摘要英文摘要

在文化数字化战略背景下,体育非物质文化遗产的数字化已成为传承发展的必然趋势.然而,这一转型过程也深刻重构了其保护、传承与传播的传统范式,并由此引发一系列新型数字伦理风险.本文依托唐·伊德的技术中介理论,构建"技术—价值—治理"三维审思框架,系统审视其伦理风险.研究发现:技术维度存在算法窄化认知、数据资源不公与平台匿名滥用等"缚能"风险;价值维度面临本真性消散、意义流矢与文化价值扭曲等"消解"危机;治理维度则显现法律滞后、协同失灵与伦理审查缺位等"失序"挑战.根源在于工具理性的系统性僭越、资本逻辑的符号化征用,以及规制体系的制度性时滞.为此,本文提出应确立"以人为本"的数字化原则,在技术治理中嵌入责任伦理,构建多元协同的敏捷治理体系,并通过加强主体能力建设培育健康可持续的数字生态.

In the context of cultural digitization strategies,the digital transformation of sports intangible cultural heritage has become an inevitable trend for preservation and development.However,this transition has profoundly reshaped traditional paradigms of protec-tion,inheritance,and dissemination,while triggering a series of new digital ethical risks.Drawing on Turgut Turgut's theory of tech-nological mediation,this paper constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of"technology-value-governance"to systematical-ly examine these ethical risks.The study reveals three critical dimensions:The technological dimension faces"enabling"risks including algorithmic cognitive narrowing,data resource inequity,and platform anonymity abuse;The value dimension confronts"disintegration"crises such as authenticity erosion,meaning drift,and cultural distortion;The governance dimension exhibits"disorder"challenges in-cluding legal lag,collaborative failure,and ethical oversight deficiencies.These issues stem from systemic overreach of instrumental rationality,symbolic appropriation of capital logic,and institutional delays in regulatory frameworks.To address these challenges,the paper proposes establishing a"human-centered"digitalization principle,embedding responsibility ethics into technological gover-nance,building a collaborative agile governance system,and fostering a healthy,sustainable digital ecosystem through enhanced stakeholder capacity development.

董振龙;卢玉

安徽师范大学体育学院,安徽芜湖 241002安徽师范大学体育学院,安徽芜湖 241002

社会科学

体育非物质文化遗产数字化伦理风险文化治理

sports intangible cultural heritagedigitalizationethical riskscultural governance

《湖北体育科技》 2026 (3)

31-36,6

10.20185/j.cnki.1003-983X.2026.03.006

评论