成人轻中度烧烫伤患者全身抗生素使用与预后相关性分析研究OA
Correlation analysis between systemic antibiotic use and prognosis in adult patients with mild to moderate thermal and scald burns
目的 分析成人轻中度烧烫伤患者全身抗生素使用对感染发生率、创面治愈率、住院天数等因素的影响.方法 回顾性选取2019年1月至2020年4月解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院收治的成人轻中度烧烫伤患者(总烧伤面积≤30%总体表面积,Ⅲ度烧伤面积≤2%)53例,根据患者是否存在感染指标升高及主管医师对患者感染风险的评估结果确定是否全身使用抗生素,并据此将患者分为全身抗生素使用组(26例)和无全身抗生素使用组(27例),倾向评分匹配(1∶1)后全身抗生素使用组和无全身抗生素使用组各为8例.比较两组一般资料、实验室检查指标和其他干预措施、倾向评分匹配前后转归与预后.结果 全身抗生素使用组Ⅲ度烧伤面积[0.05(0,1.00)%TBSA]高于无全身抗生素使用组[0(0,0)%TBSA],差异有统计学意义(z=-2.437,P<0.05).全身抗生素使用组发热患者占比、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、手术患者占比、外用抗生素患者占比[分别为50.00%(13/26)、(12.18±4.18)×109/L、(9.03±3.92)×109/L、34.62%(9/26)、53.85%(14/26)]高于无全身抗生素使用组[分别为14.81%(4/27)、(8.55±2.35)×109/L、(5.79±2.01)×109/L、0%TBSA(0/27)、25.93%TBSA(7/27)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.526,t=-3.880、-3.764,χ2=8.936、4.316,P<0.05).倾向评分匹配前,全身抗生素使用组住院总费用[15 147(11 164,20 795)元]高于无全身抗生素使用组[7 773(4 463,10 243)元],差异有统计学意义(z=-4.341,P<0.001);倾向评分匹配后,两组感染发生率、出院时创面治愈率、住院天数、创面愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.001).结论 对于烧伤总面积≤30%TBSA,Ⅲ度烧伤面积≤2%TBSA的成人轻中度烧烫伤患者,全身抗生素使用在降低感染发生率、改善局部创面的转归、缩短住院天数方面并不获益,且增加了患者总住院费用.
Objective To analyze the impact of systemic antibiotic use on factors such as the incidence of infection,wound healing rate,and length of hospital stay in adult patients with mild-to-moderate burns.Methods A total of 53 adult patients with mild to moderate burns(total burn area≤30%total body surface area,with third-degree burns≤2%)admitted to the 910th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from January 2019 to April 2020 were retrospectively enrolled.According to the administration of systemic antibiotics,the patients were initially divided into a systemic antibiotic group(n=26)and a non-systemic antibiotic group(n=27).After 1∶1 propensity score matching(PSM),8 cases were finally included in each group.The baseline data,laboratory test indicators,other intervention measures,as well as the outcomes and prognosis before and after PSM were compared between the two groups.Results The area of third-degree burn in the systemic antibiotic group[0.05(0,1.00)%TBSA]was higher than that in the non-systemic antibiotic group[0(0,0)%TBSA],with a statistically significant difference(z=-2.437,P<0.05).The proportions of fever,white blood cell(WBC)count,neutrophil count,surgical intervention,and topical antibiotic use in the systemic antibiotic group[50.00%(13/26),(12.18±4.18)×109/L,(9.03±3.92)×109/L,34.62%(9/26),and 53.85%(14/26),respectively]were higher than those in the non-systemic antibiotic group[14.81%(4/27),(8.55±2.35)×109/L,(5.79±2.01)×109/L,0%TBSA(0/27),and 25.93%TBSA(7/27),respectively],with statistically significant differences(χ2=7.526;t=-3.880,-3.764;χ2=8.936,4.316,P<0.05).Before propensity score matching,the total hospitalization cost in the systemic antibiotic group[15,147(11,164;20,795)yuan]was significantly higher than that in the non-systemic antibiotic group[7,773(4,463;10,243)yuan];(z=-4.341,P<0.001).After propensity score matching,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of infection rate,wound healing rate at discharge,length of hospital stay,and wound healing time(P>0.05).Conclusions For adult patients with mild to moderate burns and scalds with a total burn area≤30%TBSA and a third-degree burn area≤2%TBSA,the use of systemic antibiotics does not benefit in reducing the incidence of infection,local wound outcome,and shortening hospital stay,even increases the total hospitalization cost.
林奕锋;刘江涛;王一勇
解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院烧伤整形科,福建 泉州 362000解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院烧伤整形科,福建 泉州 362000解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院烧伤整形科,福建 泉州 362000
烧伤预防创面修复抗生素住院天数住院费用
burnspreventionwound repairantibioticlength of hospital stayhospitalization cost
《感染、炎症、修复》 2026 (2)
161-165,5
福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2023J012241)
评论