首页|期刊导航|赣南医科大学学报|宫颈癌近距离放射治疗剂量学与临床疗效研究

宫颈癌近距离放射治疗剂量学与临床疗效研究OA

Study on dosimetry and clinical efficacy of intensive cervical cancer radiotherapy

中文摘要英文摘要

宫颈癌是全球女性中发病率和死亡率均居第四位的常见恶性肿瘤,对女性健康构成重大威胁.近距离放射治疗在局部晚期宫颈癌(Locally advanced cervical cancer,LACC)的综合治疗中占据核心地位,其施源方式的选择直接影响靶区剂量分布及危及器官(Organ at risk,OARs)的受照情况.本文综述了LACC近距离放射治疗相关技术的研究进展,包括腔内近距离放射治疗(Intracavitary brachytherapy,ICBT)、组织间插植近距离放射治疗(Interstitial brachytherapy,ISBT)以及腔内联合组织间插植近距离放射治疗(Intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy,IC/ISBT)的临床应用与剂量学特点,通过综合分析多项临床研究,比较不同施源方式在靶区覆盖、OARs剂量控制及临床疗效方面的差异.现有研究结果显示,IC/ISBT在优化靶区剂量覆盖、降低OARs受照剂量方面较单纯ICBT或ISBT具有一定优势,尤其在肿瘤体积较大或形态不规则的LACC患者中表现更为显著.然而,由于IC/ISBT为有创操作,其潜在并发症风险及适应证仍需结合肿瘤特征和患者个体情况进行综合评估.综上,LACC近距离放射治疗的施源方式与施源器选择尚缺乏统一标准,未来仍需通过前瞻性研究和剂量学优化策略,进一步明确不同技术在个体化治疗中的应用价值,为临床决策提供更高质量的证据.

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide,ranking fourth in both incidence and mortality,and it poses a significant threat to women's health globally.Brachytherapy plays a pivotal role in the comprehensive management of locally advanced cervical cancer(LACC),and the choice of applicator technique directly influences dose distribution to the target volume as well as radiation exposure to organs at risk(OARs).This article systematically reviews recent advances in brachytherapy techniques for LACC,including intracavitary brachytherapy(ICBT),interstitial brachytherapy(ISBT),and combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy(IC/ISBT).The clinical applications and dosimetric characteristics of these approaches are summarized.By synthesizing evidence from multiple clinical studies,differences among these techniques in terms of target coverage,OAR dose sparing,and clinical outcomes are comparatively analyzed.Current evidences indicates that IC/ISBT demonstrates certain advantages over ICBT or ISBT alone in improving target dose coverage and reducing radiation exposure to OARs,particularly in patients with large or irregularly shaped tumors.However,as an invasive procedure,IC/ISBT is associated with potential complications,and its indications should be carefully evaluated based on tumor characteristics and individual patient conditions.In summary,there is currently no unified standard for the selection of brachytherapy techniques and applicators in the treatment of LACC.Future prospective studies and further dosimetric optimization strategies are warranted to clarify the role of different techniques in individualized treatment and to provide higher-quality evidence for clinical decision-making.

王欣颖;郭小青

赣南医科大学第一临床医学院赣南医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科,江西 赣州 341000

医药卫生

宫颈肿瘤近距离放射治疗施源器临床疗效剂量学分析

Uterine cervical neoplasmsBrachytherapyApplicatorClinical efficacyDosimetry

《赣南医科大学学报》 2026 (4)

316-322,7

10.3969/j.issn.2097-7174.2026.04.004

评论