首页|期刊导航|国际论坛|人工智能与公共外交变革

人工智能与公共外交变革OACHSSCD

Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Public Diplomacy

中文摘要英文摘要

人工智能(AI)正推动公共外交从数字化向智能化发生系统性跃迁.自2010年以来,公共外交的智能化转型经历了平台拓展与数据辅助分析萌芽的探索阶段(2010-2016年)、算法能力跃升与认知操纵治理的深化阶段(2017-2019年),以及生产变革与体系化运作的成熟阶段(2020年至今),AI逐步从外置辅助工具内化为结构性能力.在此过程中,倾听机制由样本式监测转向全域态势感知与预警,倡议行动从周期性人工策划升级为算法驱动的叙事工程,文化外交则由单向度实体展示深化为交互式的信任积累与价值对齐.AI时代的公共外交由此呈现出受众对象微粒化、实践手段精准化、能力外延与人机深度协同,以及影响持续纵深化的新特征,更加指向对认知结构与关系网络的长期塑造.然而,算法茧房的加剧与日益隐匿、深度伪造对信誉的持续侵蚀以及技术依赖引发的结构性脆弱,构成这一智能化转型过程中不可回避的风险.面对上述挑战,中国公共外交亟须统筹智能赋能与传统人文双轨实践、依托民生场景转化后发优势、积极参与推动AI全球治理,为探索统筹发展与安全的智能化公共外交路径贡献中国智慧.

Artificial intelligence is driving a systemic transformation of public diplomacy,shifting its operational logic from digitalization to intelligentization.Since 2010,this transformation has unfolded across three distinct phases:an exploratory phase(2010-2016)marked by platform expansion and data-augmented analysis;a deepening phase(2017-2019)characterized by algorithmic leaps and emerging governance responses to computational propaganda;and a maturing phase(2020-present)defined by generative AI-driven content production and the integration of intelligent communication systems.Across these phases,AI has evolved from an auxiliary instrument into a structural capacity embedded within core public diplomacy functions,fundamentally reshaping the three pillars of practice.Listening mechanisms have advanced from selective monitoring to real-time sentiment mapping and predictive analytics.Advocacy has shifted from manually curated messaging to algorithmically optimized,platform-native communication.Cultural diplomacy has transitioned from one-dimensional project outreach toward a deeper focus on interactive trust-building and value alignment.The result is a public diplomacy paradigm defined by audience micro-targeting,precision engagement,human-machine collaboration,and deeper cognitive influence—oriented less toward information reach than toward the long-term shaping of belief structures and relational networks.These advances,however,carry systemic risks.Algorithmic echo chambers are becoming more pervasive and harder to detect;deepfakes and synthetic media pose persistent threats to institutional credibility;and technological dependence is generating structural vulnerabilities.For China,navigating this landscape requires a dual-track approach that integrates AI-enabled capabilities with traditional people-to-people diplomacy,leverages its strengths in AI-powered public services to foster algorithmic soft power,and actively contributes to shaping global AI governance frameworks-advancing a model of intelligent public diplomacy that balances technological innovation with strategic stability.

唐小松;王雅萍;朱海明

广东外语外贸大学区域国别研究院广东外语外贸大学区域国别研究院广东外语外贸大学区域国别学院(国际关系研究院)(广州 邮编:510410)

社会科学

人工智能公共外交实践变革智能化

artificial intelligencepublic diplomacypractice transformationintelligentization

《国际论坛》 2026 (3)

99-118,20

10.13549/j.cnki.cn11-3959/d.2026.03.006

评论