日间单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在巨大胆囊结石、肥胖及老年患者中的应用效果OA
Application of ambulatory single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in giant gallstones,obesity and elderly patients under ambulatory mode
目的 分析日间单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)在巨大胆囊结石、肥胖及老年患者中的应用价值及临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2023年1月至12月在四川省人民医院接受日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ALC)的1 596例患者临床资料,其中43例因退出日间模式被剔除,最终将1 553例患者根据手术方式分为SILC组(n=775)和传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术组(TPLC)(n=778),重点对比分析两组患者的术中及术后资料,评价日间模式下SILC的临床疗效.另外将两组患者分别按胆囊结石最大径≥3 cm(巨大胆囊结石组)、身体质量指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2(肥胖组)和年龄≥65岁(老年组)进行亚组分析,重点评估手术时间、术后视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)疼痛评分及术后并发症,探讨SILC在特殊人群中的安全性及有效性.结果 两组患者术中出血量、手术时间及并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但SILC组较TPLC组术后VAS评分显著降低[3(2,4)分vs 5(4,6)分,P<0.001].亚组分析显示,巨大胆囊结石患者中,SILC组手术时间更短[(55.18±9.41)min vs(57.85±9.03)min,P=0.023)],术后VAS评分明显降低[3(2,4)分 vs 5(4,6)分,P<0.001];肥胖和老年患者中,两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但SILC组VAS评分均低于TPLC组[肥胖亚组 3(2,4)分vs 5(5,6)分;老年亚组3(2,4)分 vs 5(5,6)分,均P<0.001].各亚组中SILC组与TPLC组并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 日间SILC和TPLC均安全可行,在保证微创安全的前提下,SILC既可提升巨大胆囊结石患者的手术效率,又可优化各类特殊患者的疼痛管理.因此,在严格评估患者基线条件后,日间SILC可作为巨大胆囊结石、肥胖及老年等特殊人群ALC的优选方案之一.
Objective To analyze the application value and clinical efficacy of ambulatory single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC)in giant gallstones,obesity and elderly patients.Methods Clinical data of 1 596 patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy(ALC)at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.After excluding 43 patients who withdrew from the ambulatory pathway,1 553 patients were finally divided according to surgical procedure into the SILC group(n=775)and the traditional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(TPLC)group(n=778).Intraoperative and postoperative data were compared between the two groups to evaluate the clinical efficacy of SILC in the ambulatory setting.Additionally,subgroup analyses were performed based on gallstone diameter≥3 cm(the giant gallstone subgruop),body mass index(BMI)≥30 kg/m2(the obesity subgroup),and age≥65 years(the elder subgroup).Operative time,postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS)pain scores,and postoperative complications were assessed to explore the safety and efficacy of SILC in these special populations.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss,operative time,or overall complication rate(P>0.05).However,the SILC group had significantly lower postoperative VAS pain scores[3(2,4)vs 5(4,6),P<0.001].Subgroup analysis showed that patients with giant gallstones,the SILC group had shorter operative time[(55.18±9.41)min vs(57.85±9.03)min,P=0.023]and significantly lower postoperative VAS pain scores[3(2,4)vs 5(4,6),P<0.001].Among obese and elderly patients,there was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups(P>0.05),but the SILC group had consistently lower VAS pain scores than the TPLC group[the obesity subgroup:3(2,4)vs 5(5,6);the elder subgroup:3(2,4)vs 5(5,6);all P<0.001].No statistically significant differences in complication rates were observed in any subgroup(P>0.05).Conclusion Both ambulatory SILC and TPLC are safe and feasible.SILC not only enhances surgical efficiency in patients with giant gallstones but also optimizes postoperative pain management across various special populations while ensuring the safety of minimally invasive surgery.Therefore,after rigorous assessment of patient baseline conditions,SILC can be considered a preferred option for ambulatory cholecystectomy in special populations including those with giant gallstones,obesity,and elder.
黄建花;徐梦艺;杨冲;张宇
西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科,四川 泸州 646000||四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院(电子科技大学附属医院)肝胆胰外科,四川 成都 610072四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院(电子科技大学附属医院)肝胆胰外科,四川 成都 610072四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院(电子科技大学附属医院)肝胆胰外科,四川 成都 610072西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科,四川 泸州 646000||四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院(电子科技大学附属医院)肝胆胰外科,四川 成都 610072
医药卫生
腹腔镜胆囊切除术日间手术单孔巨大结石肥胖老年
laparoscopic cholecystectomyambulatory surgerysingle-portgiant gallstoneobesityeldly patient
《肝胆胰外科杂志》 2026 (5)
332-337,345,7
四川省干部保健科研项目(川干研2024-214)四川省成都市卫健委课题(2024202).
评论