首页|期刊导航|广东农业科学|池塘循环流水养殖不同密度罗非鱼的生长及生理生化指标分析

池塘循环流水养殖不同密度罗非鱼的生长及生理生化指标分析OA

Analysis of Growth and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Tilapia in Recirculating Ponds with Different Stocking Densities

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]探究池塘循环流水养殖系统(In-pond raceway system,IPRS)中不同养殖密度对罗非鱼生长性能及生理生化指标的影响,评估该系统下罗非鱼适宜养殖密度.[方法]在IPRS3个流水槽中设置3个密度梯度:A组(164尾/m2)、B组(136尾/m2)和C组(118尾/m2),同时设置传统池塘养殖(Traditional pond aquaculture,TPA)为对照组D(3尾/m2),测定各组罗非鱼生长性能、血清生化指标及抗氧化应激水平.[结果]养殖138 d后,IPRS中各试验组罗非鱼生长性能呈现随养殖密度升高而降低的趋势,其中C组表现最佳,其终末体质量、特定生长率和绝对生长率与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),且优于A组与B组.IPRS模式显著提高饲料利用率,各试验组饲料系数(FCR)均低于对照组.血清生化指标显示,随养殖密度上升,各试验组罗非鱼血清酸性磷酸酶(ACP)活性、谷草转氨酶(AST)活性、葡萄糖(GLU)含量均先增高后减少,总胆固醇(T-CHO)含量则呈下降趋势;相比于对照组,试验组碱性磷酸酶(AKP)和T-CHO活性均显著升高(P<0.05);谷丙转氨酶(ALT)与肌酐(CRE)水平则随密度增加持续上升,各试验组较对照组均显著升高(P<0.05).抗氧化系统响应表明,随密度增加,试验组罗非鱼脑组织超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性有所降低,谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)活性呈先下降后升高的变化,其中C组SOD、CAT、GSH-Px活性比A组高147.84%、143.72%和132.81%;肝脏SOD与GSH-Px活性随密度升高而提高,而CAT活性先升高后下降;试验组罗非鱼脑组织与肝脏的丙二醛(MDA)含量较对照组明显降低(P<0.05),表明IPRS模式并未造成机体的氧化损伤.[结论]在本试验中,IPRS条件下罗非鱼以118尾/m2的密度养殖为宜.此密度下罗非鱼血清ALT、AST等应激指标虽高于传统池塘养殖,但仍处于机体可耐受范围,罗非鱼对循环流水养殖环境具有较优的适应能力,生长性能良好,有利于实现养殖效益与机体健康的平衡.

[Objective]This study aimed to investigate the effects of different stocking densities on growth performance and physiological and biochemical indexes of tilapia in an In-Pond Raceway System(IPRS),and to determine the appropriate stocking density for this culture system.[Method]Three density gradients were established in separate raceways of the IPRS:Group A(164 fish/m2),Group B(136 fish/m2),and Group C.A traditional pond aquaculture(TPA)system stocked at 3 fish/m2 served as the control(Group D).The growth performance,serum biochemical parameters,and antioxidant stress levels of tilapia in each group were measured.[Result]After 138 days of culture,growth performance in the IPRS groups showed a clear declining trend with increasing density.Group C performed best,with final body weight(FBW),specific growth rate(SGR),and absolute growth rate(AGR)not significantly different from those of the control(P>0.05),and superior to those of Groups A and B.Feed utilization rate was markedly improved under IPRS,as evidenced by lower feed conversion ratios(FCR)across all IPRS groups compared to the control.Serum biochemical parameters varied with density:acid phosphatase(ACP)and aspartate aminotransferase(AST)activities,as well as glucose(GLU)content generally increased from C to B and then decreased toward A,whereas the total cholesterol(T-CHO)content showed a decreasing trend.Alkaline phosphatase(AKP)and T-CHO activities were significantly higher in all IPRS groups than in the control(P<0.05),with Group C maintaining relatively balanced activity levels.Alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and creatinine(CRE)concentrations rose steadily with increasing density and were significantly elevated in all IPRS groups relative to the control(P<0.05).Antioxidant responses differed between tissues.In brain tissue,superoxide dismutase(SOD)and catalase(CAT)activities tended to decrease with rising density,while glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px)activity first declined and then increased;SOD,CAT and GSH-Px in Group C was 147.84%,143.72%,and 132.81%higher than in Group A,respectively.In liver tissue,SOD and GSH-Px activities increased with density,whereas CAT activity rose initially and then fell.Malondialdehyde(MDA)contents in both brain and liver were significantly lower in all IPRS groups than in the control(P<0.05),indicating that the IPRS environment did not induce oxidative damage.[Conclusion]Under the conditions of this experiment,a stocking density of 118 fish/m2 is recommended for tilapia reared in IPRS.At this density,although serum ALT and AST levels were higher than in traditional pond culture,they remained within physiologically tolerable ranges.Fish exhibited good adaptation to the recirculating raceway environment,maintained strong growth performance,and achieved a favorable balance between production efficiency and health status.

马之瑞;陈丽婷;何智昌;陈旭;严欣;郭忠宝;肖俊;李丹;罗永巨

广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021湖南师范大学生命科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021||湖南师范大学生命科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021||上海应用技术大学城市建设与生态技术学部,上海 201418广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院/农业农村部中国(广西)东盟水产种质资源综合开发与利用重点实验室(部省共建)/广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室,广西 南宁 530021

农业科技

罗非鱼池塘循环流水养殖模式养殖密度生长性能生理生化指标生理应激水平

tilapiain-pond raceway systemstocking densitygrowth performancephysiological and biochemical indexesphysiological stress levels

《广东农业科学》 2026 (3)

42-52,11

国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-46)广西水产遗传育种与健康养殖重点实验室自主研究课题(2024-A-01-01)广西壮族自治区水产科学研究院重点实验室开放课题(GXKEYLA-2023-01-5)

10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2026.03.004

评论