首页|期刊导航|工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程|论道家设计思想中的"上游思维"

论道家设计思想中的"上游思维"OA

On the"Upstream Thinking"in the Daoist Philosophy of Design

中文摘要英文摘要

道家哲学中蕴含的设计思想为现代设计赋予了形上基础与价值指引,具体体现为"技进乎道"的超越目标、"大制不割"的方法根基,以及"器以载道"的价值导向.这些思想背后所展现的整体性、预见性、根本性干预等"上游思维"特征,揭示了对问题之源的深刻洞见、对事理之机的高效干预,以及对下游自保式回应的超越.然而,在具体的设计实践中,由于认知的路径依赖、激励制度的错位和责任机制的模糊等现实障碍,道家设计思想中的"上游思维"优势未能充分展现.因此,需要借助可视化、制度化、源头性问责的系统联动方式,构建一个认知、制度、治理三者耦合共生的实践框架,以推动设计实践向"上游"的回归.

In light of the ecological crises,technological alienation,and value imbalances that are increasingly surfacing in the modern era,the limitations of the prevailing conception of design rooted in the framework of Western modernity are being gradually exposed.Owing to its profound ontological foundations and value guidance,Chinese philosophy,in particular,Daoist thoughts,can offer an informative and enriching perspective to the reflection and reconstruction of Western modern design theory.This paper attempts to reconstruct a Daoist philosophy of design and explore how it can guide modern design theory and practice beyond the boundaries of contemporary western design paradigms. In particular,the design philosophy inherent in Daoist thoughts gives modern design studies a more profound metaphysical underpinning,epitomized most clearly in the transcendent aspiration of"Technique Advancing into Dao"(技进乎道).This principle reveals that design should not be confined to the level of technical skill or instrumental problem-solving.Rather,through enduring practice and deep understandings of the natural order,technique can ascend towards Dao.In this sense,Dao is the ultimate horizon that guides and governs design activities.While this principle defines the metaphysical orientation of design,the concept of"Good Governance Never Fragments"(大制不割)offers its methodological basis.It stresses the need to respect the inherent patterns and integrity of things and not to intervene excessively or forcefully,but to allow forms and functions to unfold according to their own natural tendencies.Finally,the concept of"Utensils as Vehicle of Dao"(器以载道)helps to express the value orientation of Daoist design.Artifacts are not simply utilitarian tools,but mediums of mediation through which deeper principles are made perceptible and operative in everyday life.Through the careful shaping of form,function and interaction,design has the potential to transfer abstract philosophical understandings into concrete experiential processes and enable techniques and artifacts to become the experiential carrier through which Dao is manifested,apprehended and gradually realized in the lived experience. Demonstrated by its insights on the sources of the systemic issues,its efficient interventions at the core of the issues,and its focus on transcending downstream reactive responses,this framework of the Daoist philosophy of design exhibits features of holism,foresight and fundamental intervention which resonate with the typical characteristics of"upstream thinking".However,as important as their advantages,both Daoist design philosophy and"upstream thinking",in practice,are prone to being the victim of real-world obstacles.In most cases,because of cognitive path dependency,the urgency of"downstream"reactive measures tend to overshadow"upstream"prevention.At the same time,institutional incentive systems are often designed to reward quick fixes over more system-wide interventions,and the absence of clear accountability for addressing the"upstream"roots discourages actors from acting at the source.These obstacles make"upstream"problems unseen,"upstream"efforts unrecognized and"upstream"responsibilities undesignated.To overcome such barriers and to enable Daoist design philosophy to realize its full potentials,this paper proposes a framework of practice,totaling elements of cognition,institution and governance.Specifically,it calls for advancing visualization so that"upstream"causal structures are perceivable,institutionalization so that"upstream-oriented"principles are entrenched in decision-making and incentive systems,and source-oriented accountability mechanisms so that"upstream"responsibility is undertaken.Under this framework,each part works in a mutually reinforcing way with each other,with the goal of bringing design to a more"upstream"orientation.

张卫;张书赫

大连理工大学 人文学院,大连 116024大连理工大学 人文学院,大连 116024

社会科学

道家哲学上游思维设计哲学技进乎道大制不割机制构建

Taoist philosophyupstream thinkingdesign philosophyTechnique Advancing into the DaoGood Governance Never Fragmentsconstruction of institutional frameworks

《工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程》 2026 (3)

213-224,12

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金:技术设计的伦理嵌入机制研究(24YJA7200)

10.3724/j.issn.1674-4969.20260011

评论