缓控释氮肥与水肥一体化技术降低土壤氮素损失并优化大豆氮素营养OA
Effects of single-basal application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer and drip fertigation on soybean nitrogen nutrition and soil nitrogen losses
[目的]比较缓控释氮肥和水肥一体化技术在减少土壤氮淋失、促进大豆生长方面的效果,并分析不同品种大豆的生长、根瘤酶活性和产量构成因素对两种施肥技术的响应差异.[方法]田间试验于 2023 年在河南商丘进行,供试大豆品种为夏大豆'中黄 301'和'郑 1307'.试验采用裂区设计,主区为大豆品种,副区为施肥处理,包括常规施肥、缓控释氮肥一次基施和水肥一体化 3 种处理.在大豆苗期(V6)、盛花期(R2)、鼓粒期(R6)和收获期(R8),采集 0-60 cm 土层土壤样品,每 10 cm 为一层,测定铵态氮和硝态氮含量;采集大豆植株样品,测定株高、地上部及根系干物质积累量和根瘤酶活性;收获期测产并调查产量构成因素.利用冗余分析法分析土壤养分含量对大豆产量的影响.[结果]1)中黄 301 在缓控释氮肥处理下较常规施肥显著降低了V6—R6 期各土层铵态氮含量,水肥一体化处理较常规施肥处理显著降低了 R6—R8 期各土层铵态氮含量;郑1307 采用缓控释氮肥处理和水肥一体化处理降低了 40 cm 以下土层硝态氮含量.2)中黄 301 在 R2 期,缓控释氮肥处理和水肥一体化处理的地上部干物质重分别较常规施肥提高 95.40%和 71.06%,在 R6 期分别提高12.82%和26.41%.郑1307在水肥一体化处理下,V6期地上部干物质重较常规施肥处理和缓控释氮肥处理分别显著提高 45.45%、51.04%,R2 期分别提高 19.02%、21.71%,R6 期分别提高 13.63%、12.16%;R8 期分别提高12.91%、20.79%.中黄 301 和郑 1307 根瘤酶活性对不同氮肥处理的响应存在显著差异,中黄 301 根瘤酶活性在 3 种氮肥处理间差异不显著,而郑 1307 在缓控释氮肥和水肥一体化处理下分别较常规施肥处理提高 33.19%、59.65%.3)缓控释氮肥和水肥一体化在供试大豆品种上的增产效果差异显著.中黄 301 水肥一体化处理较常规施肥处理增产 26.80%;郑 1307 缓控释氮肥处理和水肥一体化处理分别较常规施肥处理增产 9.50%和 18.50%.[结论]与常规施肥相比,缓控释氮肥一次性基施和水肥一体化技术能降低大豆生育前期深层土壤氮素含量,减少氮素淋失风险,缓解"氮遏制"现象,增强盛花期根瘤酶活性,保证大豆生育后期氮素供给,增加干物质积累进而提高大豆产量.水肥一体化效果优于缓控释氮肥一次性基施,且对两个品种均有显著促进作用,而缓控释氮肥一次性基施仅对品种郑1307表现出明显提升效应.
[Objectives]This study evaluated the effects of single-basal application of controlled-release nitrogen(N)fertilizer and drip fertigation on soil N leaching,soybean growth,and N nutrition,and compared the differential responses of soybean cultivars in terms of growth,nodule enzyme activity,and yield components under the two technologies.[Methods]A field experiment was conducted in Shangqiu,Henan Province in 2023,using two summer soybean cultivars'Zhonghuang 301'and'Zheng 1307'as the test materials.Three fertilization treatments were set up:conventional fertilization(CF),single-basal application of controlled-release N fertilizer(CRNF),and drip fertigation(DF).At the seedling(V6),full flowering(R2),seed-filling(R6),and harvest stages(R8),soil samples from the 0-60 cm profile at 10 cm intervals were collected to determine ammonium-N and nitrate-N contents.Soybean plant samples were collected to measure plant height,dry matter accumulation in above-and under-ground parts,and nodule enzyme activity.Yield and yield components were determined at harvest.Redundancy analysis was conducted to identify the key factors closely related to the yield of soybean cultivars.[Results]1)For Zhonghuang 301,the CRNF treatment significantly reduced ammonium-N contents in all soil layers during the V6-R6 stages compared with CF treatment,whereas DF treatment significantly reduced ammonium-N contents during the R6-R8 stages.For Zheng 1307,both CRNF and DF treatments reduced nitrate-N contents below the 40 cm soil layer.2)For Zhonghuang 301,above-ground dry matter under CRNF and DF treatment increased by 95.40%and 71.06%at the R2 stage,and by 12.82%and 26.41%at the R6 stage,respectively,compared with CF.For Zheng 1307,above-ground dry matter under DF increased significantly by 45.45%and 51.04%at the V6 stage,19.02%and 21.71%at the R2 stage,13.63%and 12.16%at the R6 stage,and 12.91%and 20.79%at the R8 stage,respectively,compared with CF and CRNF.The responses of nodule enzyme activity to N treatments differed significantly between the two cultivars.No significant differences were observed among treatments for Zhonghuang 301,whereas that of Zheng 1307 under CRNF and DF treatments were 33.19%and 59.65%higher than that under CF treatment.3)Yield responses to CRNF and DF treatments differed significantly between cultivars.Compared with CF,DF treatment increased the yield of Zhonghuang 301 by 26.80%;CRNF and DF treatment increased the yield of Zheng 1307 by 9.50%and 18.50%,respectively.[Conclusions]Both single-basal application of controlled-release N fertilizer and drip fertigation reduced nitrogen accumulation in deep soil layers during the early soybean growth stage,thereby decreasing the risk of N leaching and alleviating the"nitrogen suppression"phenomenon.These treatments also enhanced nodule enzyme activity at the full flowering stage,ensured N supply during the late growth stage,promoted dry matter accumulation,and ultimately increased yield.Drip fertigation performs better than single-basal application of controlled-release N fertilizer as its significant effect on both cultivars,while single-basal application of controlled-release N fertilizer merely showed promotion on cultivar Zheng 1307.
冀金梦;王明辉;李庭宇;谢坤;王广帅;王天舒;孟熠黎;尧水红
北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081商丘市乡村产业发展中心,河南 商丘 476211北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081河南商丘农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站/农业农村长期因子综合观测商丘站/中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所,河南 新乡 453000河南商丘农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站/农业农村长期因子综合观测商丘站/中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所,河南 新乡 453000北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081
缓控释氮肥水肥一体化土壤氮素动态大豆品种产量构成
controlled-release nitrogen fertilizersdrip fertigationsoil nitrogen dynamicssoybean varietiesyield components
《植物营养与肥料学报》 2026 (4)
768-780,13
国家大豆产业技术体系(CARS-04)中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(1610132022014).
评论