首页|期刊导航|种子|100份马铃薯种质资源的综合评价

100份马铃薯种质资源的综合评价OA

Comprehensive Evaluation of 100 Solanum tuberosum Germplasm Resources Materials

中文摘要英文摘要

为筛选适应贵州地区生态条件、具备优良品质特性且满足不同加工需求的马铃薯品种,以100份马铃薯品种为材料,对其9个质量性状和10个数量性状进行调查,采用主成分分析与聚类分析方法对试验结果进行综合评估.研究显示,100份马铃薯品种的数量性状差异显著,变异系数为15.00%~71.42%.相关性分析发现,100份马铃薯品种的一些性状间存在显著或极显著相关性.通过主成分分析,提取了4个主成分,累计贡献率达到69.455%,通过计算4个主成分因子得分和数量性状的综合得分,可将100份马铃薯供试材料分为四大类群,其中第Ⅰ类群共27份材料,综合表现最佳;第Ⅱ类群共34份材料,综合表现较好;第Ⅲ类群共12份材料,综合表现中等;第Ⅳ类群共27份材料,综合表现较差.通过主成分分析和综合得分F值筛选出10份较为优异的马铃薯品种.

In order to select Solanum tuberosum varieties that are suitable for the ecological conditions of Guizhou region,possess excellent quality characteristics and meet different processing require-ments,100 Solanum tuberosum varieties were used as materials.9 quality traits and ten quantitative traits of these varieties were investigated.The results of the experiment were comprehensively evalua-ted using principal component analysis and cluster analysis methods.The study showed that the quan-titative traits of the 100 Solanum tuberosum varieties had significant differences,with the coefficient of variation ranging from 15.00%to 71.42%.Correlation analysis revealed that some traits of the 100 Solanum tuberosum varieties were significantly or extremely significantly correlated.Through princi-pal component analysis,4 principal components were extracted,with a cumulative contribution rate of 69.455%.By calculating the factor scores of the 4 principal components and the comprehensive scores of the quantitative traits,the 100 Solanum tuberosum test materials were classified into 4 major groups.Among them,the first group consisted of 27 materials,with the best overall performance.The second group consisted of 34 materials,with relatively good overall performance.The third group consisted of 12 materials,with average performance in all quantitative traits and the fourth group con-sisted of 27 materials,with the poorest overall performance.Through principal component analysis and comprehensive score F values,10 relatively excellent Solanum tuberosum varieties were selected.

李凌;陈明俊;罗小波;李标;李飞;李岩

贵州大学生命科学学院,贵阳 550025贵州省农业科学院生物技术研究所,贵阳 550009||贵州省农业生物技术重点实验室,贵阳 550009||农业农村部喀斯特山区作物基因资源与种质创新重点实验室,贵阳 550009贵州省农业科学院生物技术研究所,贵阳 550009||贵州省农业生物技术重点实验室,贵阳 550009||农业农村部喀斯特山区作物基因资源与种质创新重点实验室,贵阳 550009贵州省农业科学院生物技术研究所,贵阳 550009||贵州省农业生物技术重点实验室,贵阳 550009||农业农村部喀斯特山区作物基因资源与种质创新重点实验室,贵阳 550009贵州省农业科学院园艺研究所,贵阳 550009贵州大学生命科学学院,贵阳 550025||贵州大学农业生物工程研究院,山地植物资源保护与种质创新教育部重点实验室,贵阳 550025

农业科技

马铃薯种质资源主成分分析综合评价

Solanum tuberosumgermplasm resourcesprincipal component analysiscomprehensive evaluation

《种子》 2026 (3)

87-98,12

国家马铃薯产业技术体系贵阳综合试验站(CARS-09-ES24)贵州省育种科研基础平台创新能力建设(黔科合服企[2022]014)贵州省现代农业马铃薯产业技术体系建设专项贵州省马铃薯遗传改良科技创新新兴人才团队(黔农科院新兴团队[2026]07号)

10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2026.03.087

评论