公私法协同共治:体育非物质文化遗产数字化的双重法律保护路径OA
Co-governance of Public and Private Law:A Dual Legal Protection Path for the Digitalization of Sports Intangible Cultural Heritage
体育非物质文化遗产作为体育文化与民族传统深度融合的产物,在数字化浪潮中呈现出公权与私权的双重属性.在体育非物质文化遗产数字化私法保护上,我国目前主要适用的是知识产权模式;而公法保护模式则以《中华人民共和国非物质文化遗产法》为主要法律规范.但在数字时代背景下,上述法律保护模式存在国家保护主义过重、保护路径不清、多元主体权责不明等弊端.鉴此,有必要构建以"理想类型"为基础的公法与私法分层保护路径,通过设计具体可操作的体育非遗登记识别机制与利益反哺制度,用公权力手段保护体育非遗的传统部分,而创新部分则嵌套进知识产权法律体系的保护范畴之中,从而避免陷入"公地灾难"或"反公地灾难"的悲剧,彰显体育非物质文化遗产数字化阶段公私法保护的交织与衡平逻辑,为数字时代非遗体育的创新性保护与持续性传承提供理论支撑.
As a product deeply integrating sports culture and ethnic traditions,sports intangible cultural heritage(ICH)demonstrates dual attributes of public power and private rights amid the digital wave.In China,the private law protection for the digitalization of sports ICH mainly adopts an intellectual property rights(IPR)model,while public law protection is primarily regulated by the Law of the People's Republic of China on Intangible Cultural Heritage.Nevertheless,against the backdrop of the digital era,the above legal protection models exhibit deficiencies including excessive state protectionism,vague protection approaches,and undefined rights and responsibilities among multiple stakeholders.Accordingly,it is necessary to construct a stratified protection path for public law and private law on the basis of the"ideal type".Through the design of operable mechanisms for the registration and identification of sports ICH and a benefit feedback system,public authority may be employed to safeguard the traditional components of sports ICH,whereas the innovative components may be incorporated into the scope of protection under the intellectual property legal system.This can prevent the"tragedy of the commons"or the"tragedy of the anticommons",manifest the logic of interweaving and balancing public and private law protection in the digital development of sports ICH,and provide theoretical support for the innovative protection and sustainable inheritance of sports ICH in the digital age.
李天懿
天津财经大学法学院,天津 300222
社会科学
体育非物质文化遗产数字赋能公共利益双重保护
sports intangible cultural heritagedigital empowermentpublic interestdual protection
《自然与文化遗产研究》 2026 (2)
56-63,8
评论