亲密伴侣暴力污名量表的修订及其信效度检验OA
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Intimate Partner Violence Stigma Scale
目的:以中国大学生为样本,对亲密伴侣暴力污名量表(Intimate Partner Violence Stigma Scale,IPVSS)进行中文版修订,检验其信效度和跨性别的测量等值性.方法:采用IPVSS对1172名大学生进行测量,以最小化和寻求帮助量表(MHSS)、简明负面评价恐惧量表(BFNES)、个体歧视知觉问卷(PPDS)、短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS-21)为效标.结果:①验证性因素分析表明中文版IPVSS四因子结构模型拟合良好(x2/df=2.108,CFI=0.936,TLI=0.926,RMSEA=0.048,SRMR=0.039).②效标关联效度表明,亲密伴侣暴力污名与负面评价恐惧、歧视知觉、压力、焦虑、抑郁、最小化/隐藏呈显著正相关,与求助/披露呈显著负相关.③信度分析表明,中文版IPVSS的Cronbach's α系数为0.825,重测信度为0.768;各维度的Cronbach's α系数介于0.752~0.802之间,重测信度介于0.711~0.762之间.④量表在不同性别的群体间满足测量等值性.⑤人口学变量分析表明,大学生亲密伴侣暴力污名得分存在显著性别差异,男生在IPVSS总分及内化污名、预期污名、施暴污名的得分均显著高于女生.结论:中文版亲密伴侣暴力污名量表在我国大学生中具有良好的信效度和跨性别等值性.
Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of intimate partner violence stigma scale(IPVSS)and its measurement invariance across gender in a sample of Chinese college students.Methods:A sample of 1172 Chinese college students were recruited.The minimization and help-seeking scale(MHSS),brief fear of negative evaluation scale(BFNES),perceived personal discrimination scale(PPDS)and the depression anxiety stress scale(DASS-21)were selected as criterion-related indicators.Results:①Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor struc-ture of Chinese IPVSS was well fitted(x2/df=2.108,CFI=0.936,TLI=0.926,RMSEA=0.048,SRMR=0.039).②Criteria-related validity test showed,intimate partner violence stigma was positively correlated with fear of negative evaluation,per-ceived personal discrimination,stress,anxiety,depression,and minimization,and negatively correlated with help-seeking.③The reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach's α of the IPVSS was 0.825,the test-retest reliability was 0.768,the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.752 to 0.802,and the retest reliability ranged from 0.711 to 0.762.④Measurement invariance analysis showed that the factor structure of the IPVSS was equivalent across genders.⑤Demographic analysis revealed significant gender differences in intimate partner violence stigma scores among college stu-dents.Male students scored significantly higher than females on the total IPVSS score,as well as on the subscales of inter-nalized stigma,anticipated stigma,and perpetrator stigma.Conclusion:Chinese version of IPVSS has good reliability and validity in Chinese college students,and measurement invariance across genders.
卿再花;曾鹃;陈玮瑜;崔洪波;毕晓燕;吴彩虹;麻彦坤
湖南财政经济学院,长沙 410052||广州大学教育学院,广州 510006湖南财政经济学院,长沙 410052广州大学教育学院,广州 510006广州大学教育学院,广州 510006广州大学教育学院,广州 510006湖南财政经济学院,长沙 410052广州大学教育学院,广州 510006
医药卫生
大学生亲密伴侣暴力污名信度效度测量等值性
College studentsIntimate partner violenceStigmaReliabilityValidityMeasurement invariance
《中国临床心理学杂志》 2026 (2)
336-341,6
评论