首页|期刊导航|中国临床心理学杂志|心理痛苦和自身优势的变化与中学生内外化问题的关系:基于机器学习的证据

心理痛苦和自身优势的变化与中学生内外化问题的关系:基于机器学习的证据OA

Effects of Longitudinal Co-occurring Patterns Between Psychological Pain and Self-strength on Internalizing/Externalizing Problems:Evidence from Machine Learning Approaches

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:整合视角下探索心理痛苦、自身优势在青少年内外化问题发展中的关键作用,为青少年内外化问题的近端干预靶点提供证据.方法:采用整群便利抽样和纵向设计,选取984名初中生(M年龄=12.12±0.77)进行12个量表的两次测评,间隔时间为6个月.采用Lasso回归、Ridge回归与随机森林3种机器学习算法分别构建青少年内外化问题的识别模型,明确最优模型中的关键特征;采用潜在转变分析考察心理痛苦和自身优势的发展变化及其对青少年内外化问题的影响.结果:(1)在青少年内外化问题识别模型的特征重要性上,痛苦唤醒在风险因素中排序第一,联结在保护因素中排序第一;痛苦唤醒的重要性优于联结.(2)心理痛苦和积极发展素质的联合剖面分为3个亚组:高痛苦组(T1、T2分别为11.2%、13.9%),高优势组(T1、T2分别为45.3%、43.7%)和低优势-低痛苦组(T1、T2分别为43.5%、42.4%).(3)经历学业危机事件的青少年更可能从高优势组转变为高痛苦组(OR=25.11).经历人际危机事件的青少年更不可能从高痛苦组转变为高优势组(OR<0.001).结论:青少年内外化问题的预防和干预应从培养自身优势和降低风险因素两方面入手,重视培养青少年与同伴、重要成人建立关系和对负性情绪的有效调节能力.

Objective:This study applied latent transition analysis combined with machine learning algorithms to exam-ine the critical roles of psychological pain and positive youth development(PYD)in the development of internalizing and ex-ternalizing problems among adolescents,providing evidence for proximal intervention targets.Methods:A total of 984 middle school students(Mage=12.12±0.77)completed two surveys of 12 scales with a 6-month interval.Machine learning methods(Lasso regression,Ridge regression,and Random Forest)were employed to construct identification models for inter-nalizing and externalizing problems and to identify key features in the optimal model.Latent transition analysis was then used to investigate changes in the co-occurrent profiles of psychological pain and PYD and their effects on internalizing and externalizing problems.Results:(1)In the feature importance of the optimal identification model,pain arousal ranked first among risk factors,and connection ranked first among protective factors;the importance of pain arousal exceeded that of connection.(2)Three co-occurrent profiles of psychological pain and PYD were identified:high pain-high risk(11.2%at T1;13.9%at T2),high PYD-low risk(45.3%at T1;43.7%at T2),and moderate risk with low pain and low PYD(43.5%at T1;42.4%at T2).(3)Adolescents experiencing academic crisis events were more likely to transition from the high PYD group to the high pain group(OR=25.11),while those experiencing interpersonal crisis events were less likely to transition from the high pain group to the high PYD group(OR<0.001).Conclusion:The prevention and intervention of adolescent in-ternalizing and externalizing problems should address both the enhancement of protective factors and the reduction of risk factors.Emphasis should be placed on promoting adolescents' connections with peers and significant adults,as well as strengthening their capacity to effectively regulate negative emotions.

魏诗洁;魏昊冰;李欢欢;欧阳李晟

中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872||中国人民大学社会心理科学与工程研究中心,北京 100872中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872

医药卫生

内化问题外化问题心理痛苦自身优势机器学习潜在转变分析

Internalizing problemsExternalizing problemsPsychological painSelf-strengthMachine learningLa-tent transition analysis

《中国临床心理学杂志》 2026 (2)

249-256,8

国家社会科学基金重点项目(24ASH015)中国人民大学中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金.

10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2026.02.001

评论