数字化新技术与传统方法测量配镜参数的比较OA
A comparison between new digital technologies and traditional methods in measuring spectacle parameters
目的:评估数字化新技术(Eye-ruler2)与传统手动测量方法(五合一测量尺)在配镜参数的一致性,探索相关参数对矫正处方的影响,为眼镜精准验配及视觉质量提升提供依据和思路.方法:选择 103 名广州新华学院 18~23 岁佩戴框架眼镜的大学生,分别使用 Eye-ruler2 和五合一测量尺对研究对象及现有眼镜测量镜眼距、前倾角、面弯和瞳距,并使用马丁公式和顶点屈光力计算公式计算相关参数(镜眼距、前倾角、面弯)的配镜处方度数变化量.结果:Eye-ruler2 和五合一测量尺在瞳距、左右眼镜眼距及前倾角分别有极好(ICC=0.95)、较好(ICC=0.80)、较好(ICC=0.76)及中等(ICC=0.67)的一致性,但面弯的一致性较差(ICC=0.37);基于镜眼距、前倾角及面弯计算的配镜处方度数总变化量为(-0.12±0.15)D,各参数变化量(占比)分别为(-0.04±0.11)D(40.61%)、(-0.06±0.09)D(41.83%)和(-0.01±0.01)D(16.57%);未发现基于前倾角的变化量占比与基于镜眼距的变化量占比之间差异存在统计学意义(P=0.851),且二者均高于基于面弯变化量占比(P<0.001);原等效球镜度与屈光变化量呈正相关;处方度数在-6.00 D 以内时前倾角的影响更大,-12.00~-6.00 D 时则镜眼距的影响更大.结论:Eye-ruler2 与五合一测量尺在测量参数的一致性好,数字化新技术因其简便快捷,未来将替代传统测量方法并广泛使用;镜眼距和前倾角对于处方度数影响明显,虽然面弯对于处方影响小,但可能引发逆规散光而影响视觉质量;在未来个性化配镜的前景下,建议常态化测量镜眼距、前倾角和面弯.
Objective:To evaluate the agreement in spectacle parameter measurements between a digital device(Eye-ruler2)and a manual method(combination gauge).It also aimed to explore how these parameters affect corrective prescriptions and provide evidence and insights for achieving precision in spectacle fitting and enhancing visual quality.Methods:We enrolled 103 university students(aged 18-23 years)who were wearing spectacles from Guangzhou Xinhua University.The vertex distance,pantoscopic tilt,face form,and pupillary distance of their existing eyewear were measured using both Eye-ruler2 and a combination gauge.We applied the Martin formula and the vertex power formula to calculate the changes in prescription power induced by vertex distance,pantoscopic tilt,and face form.Results:The measurements obtained from Eye-ruler2 and the combination gauge demonstrated excellent agreement for pupillary distance(ICC=0.95),good agreement for left vertex distance(ICC=0.80)and right vertex distance(ICC=0.76),and moderate agreement for pantoscopic tilt(ICC=0.67).However,poor agreement was observed for face form(ICC=0.37).The total refractive power change in the prescription,calculated based on vertex distance,pantoscopic tilt,and face form,was(-0.12±0.15)D.The individual parameter contributions(and their proportions)were as follows:Vertex distance:(-0.04±0.11)D(40.61%),Pantoscopic tilt:(-0.06±0.09)D(41.83%),Face form:(-0.01±0.01)D(16.57%);No significant difference was found between the contributions of pantoscopic tilt and vertex distance(P=0.851),and both being significantly greater than that of face form(all P<0.001).The baseline spherical equivalent positively correlated with refractive changes.Pantoscopic tilt dominated for prescriptions≤-6.00 D,while vertex distance prevailed between-12.00 D and-6.00 D.Conclusions:Eye-ruler2 and the combination gauge demonstrated a high level of agreement in parameter measurements.Given its efficiency and user-friendliness,the digital technology is recommended to replace traditional methods for clinical use.Vertex distance and pantoscopic tilt have a significant impact on prescription power.Although face form has a minimal quantitative effect,it may induce against-the-rule astigmatism,which can compromise visual quality.For personalized spectacle fitting,it is essential to routinely measure vertex distance,pantoscopic tilt,and face form.
林智;卢林灏;王贞玉;王瑾颐;梁筠曼
中山大学中山眼科中心,眼病防治全国重点实验室,广东省眼科视觉科学重点实验室,广州 510060广州新华学院,广州 510520南方医科大学皮肤病医院,广州 510091上海依视路光学有限公司,上海 201613广州新华学院,广州 510520
医药卫生
数字化配验配镜参数处方补偿精准验配视觉质量
digital dispensingspectacle fitting parametersprescription compensationprecision dispensingvisual quality
《眼科学报》 2026 (4)
284-296,13
评论