首页|期刊导航|西南农业学报|间作对金沙江干热河谷区油橄榄林地土壤质量、果实性状及产量的影响

间作对金沙江干热河谷区油橄榄林地土壤质量、果实性状及产量的影响OA

Effects of intercropping on soil quality,fruit traits and yield of olive groves in the dry-hot valley area of the Jinsha River

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]探究间作对金沙江干热河谷区油橄榄林地土壤质量的影响.[方法]以油橄榄单作为对照(CK),以油橄榄×滇黄精(FD)、油橄榄×苜蓿(FZ)、油橄榄×苜蓿×黑麦草×大花金鸡菊(F3)3种间作处理为研究对象,对比分析不同处理对土壤理化性质、土壤微生物生物量、土壤酶活性以及油橄榄果实性状和产量的影响.[结果]与单作CK相比,FD处理的土壤速效钾含量显著降低,降低54.04%,FZ处理的碱解氮、速效钾和有机碳含量显著降低,分别降低77.01%、54.52%和57.23%,但速效磷含量提高54.51%,而F3处理的土壤养分含量无显著差异.三种间作处理均显著提高土壤水稳性大团聚体(>2 mm)比例、>0.25 mm团聚体百分含量(R0.25mm)、平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GMD),提高土壤团聚体稳定性.FD和FZ处理的土壤微生物量氮含量显著降低,分别降低41.44%和33.67%,F3处理的土壤微生物量碳含量显著增加,增加24.49%.FD和FZ处理的脲酶和纤维素酶活性显著降低,分别降低61.35%、71.12%和28.57%、35.00%,脱氢酶活性显著增加,分别增加57.58%和41.59%.而F3处理的脲酶、纤维素酶、脱氢酶和碱性磷酸酶活性间作后均显著增加,分别增加9.67%、35.71%、190.80%和54.32%.此外,F3处理的油橄榄果实纵向直径、果型指数、单果质量、果肉率及产量显著增加,分别增加12.14%、8.96%、26.01%、4.61%和11.26%.相关性分析表明,油橄榄产量与土壤酶活性、土壤养分、土壤大团聚体以及土壤稳定性指标均呈现极显著正相关关系.[结论]三种间作处理均显著提高金沙江干热河谷区油橄榄林地土壤团聚体稳定性,改善土壤结构,但FD和FZ处理与油橄榄间作存在一定的养分资源竞争和负面效应,而F3间作处理对改善林地土壤质量、果实性状以及提高产量的效果最佳,建议在生产中优先选用混合间作模式.

[Objective]The paper aims to investigate the effects of intercropping on soil quality in olive groves within the dry-hot valley region of the Jinsha River.[Method]Olive monocropping was used as the control(CK),and three intercropping treatments,olive × Polygonatum kingianum(FD),olive × Medicago sativa(FZ)and olive × M.sativa × Lolium perenne × Coreopsis grandiflora(F3)were used as the ob-jects of the study,to comparatively analyze the impacts of the varied intercropping treatments on the physicochemical properties of soil,soil microbial biomass,soil enzyme activities,and the traits of olive fruits and yields.[Result]Compared with monocropping CK,the soil available potassium content in the FD treatment decreased significantly,with a reduction of 54.04%.In the FZ treatment,the contents of soil alkali-hy-drolyzable nitrogen,available potassium and organic carbon decreased significantly,with respective reductions of 77.01%,54.52%and 57.23%,while the available phosphorus content increased significantly,with an increase of 54.51%.However,there was no significant difference in soil nutrient contents in the F3 treatment.All three intercropping treatments significantly increased the proportion of soil water-stable macroaggregates(>2 mm),the percentage of>0.25 mm aggregates(R0.25mm),themean weight diameter(MWD)and the geomet-ric mean diameter(GMD),thus improving the stability of soil aggregates.The soil microbial biomass nitrogen content in the FD and FZ treat-ments decreased significantly,with respective reductions of 41.44%and 33.67%,whereas the soil microbial biomass carbon content in the F3 treatment increased significantly,with an increase of 24.49%.The activities of urease and cellulase in the FD and FZ treatments de-creased significantly,with respective reductions of 61.35%,71.12%and 28.57%,35.00%,while the dehydrogenase activity increased sig-nificantly,with respective increases of 57.58%and 41.59%.In contrast,the F3 treatment significantly enhanced the activities of urease,cel-lulase,dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase,with respective increases of 9.67%,35.71%,190.80%and 54.32%.In addition,the F3 treatment significantly increased the longitudinal diameter,fruit shape index,single fruit weight,pulp rate and yield of olives,with respective increases of 12.14%,8.96%,26.01%,4.61%and 11.26%.Correlation analysis showed that olive yield showed highly significant positive correlations with soil enzyme activity,soil nutrients,soil macroaggregates and soil stability indicators.[Conclusion]All three intercropping treatments significantly improved the stability of soil aggregates and soil structure in olive groves in the Jinshajiang River dry-hot river valley,but there were some nutrient resource competition and negative effects of intercropping with olive in the FD and FZ treatments,while the F3 intercropping treatment had the best effect on improving the quality of the soil in the groves,fruiting traits and yield,so it is recommended to prioritize the use of mixed intercropping patterns in production.

黄楚亦;胡青;赵敏;陆斌;张光华;王猛

西南林业大学林学院,昆明 650224云南省林业和草原科学院,昆明 650201云南省林业和草原科学院,昆明 650201云南省林业和草原科学院,昆明 650201永胜茂格农业开发有限公司,云南丽江 674100西南林业大学林学院,昆明 650224

农业科技

油橄榄间作土壤化学性质土壤酶活性产量

OliveIntercroppingSoil chemical propertiesSoil enzyme activitiesYield

《西南农业学报》 2026 (3)

535-544,10

云南省科技厅重大科技专项计划(202302AE090007)丽江市院士专家工作站项目(2021-07)云南省科技厅高层次科技人才及创新团队选拔专项"技术创新人才培养对象项目"(202205AD160016)

10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2026.3.007

评论