双源CT低管电压、大螺距头颈部CT血管成像图像质量及辐射剂量的临床研究OA
Clinical Study on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Dual-Source CT with Low-Tube-Voltage and Large-Pitch in Head and Neck CT Angiography
目的 探讨第3 代双源 CT 低管电压、大螺距扫描模式在头颈部 CT 血管成像(CTA)中的图像质量及有效辐射剂量.方法 收集2024 年6 月至2025 年3 月我院疑诊血管疾病行头颈部 CTA 检查患者150 例,随机数字表法分为3 组.A 组行110 kVp 常规扫描,B 组行双能量扫描(90 kV/Sn 150 kV),C 组行80 kVp 大螺距扫描,A、B 组对比剂70 ml,C 组对比剂50 ml.测量3 组受检者主动脉弓、两侧颈总动脉近端、颈内动脉近端及大脑中动脉近端管腔 CT 值、噪声(SD),比较信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、图像主观评分及有效辐射剂量(ED)的差异.采用单因素方差分析或非参数秩和检验计算以上指标的组间统计学差异,两位评分者主观质量评分一致性采用 Kappa 检验.结果 B、C 组靶血管CT 值高于 A 组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),3 组靶血管 CT 值均>350 Hu,符合诊断要求.3 组主动脉弓、两侧颈总动脉、两侧颈内动脉 SNR 及 CNR、两侧大脑中动脉 CNR 差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),大脑中动脉 SNR 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).3 组主观评分分别为(3.62±0.60)、(3.48±0.61)、(3.50±0.70),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两名医师对3 组图像评价结果一致性良好,Kappa 值为 0.782(P<0.05).3 组有效辐射剂量分别为(1.22±0.14)mSv、(0.74±0.08)mSv、(0.23±0.04)mSv,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).C 组对比剂用量比A、B 组少20 ml.结论 低管电压、大螺距头颈部 CT 血管成像图像质量满足诊断要求,显著降低患者的辐射剂量和对比剂用量,具有可行性.
Objective To evaluate the image quality and effective radiation dose(ED)of third-generation dual-source computed tomography(CT)using low tube voltage and large-pitch scanning mode(Turbo Flash)in head and neck CT angiogra-phy(CTA).Methods A total of 150 patients with suspected vascular diseases underwent head and neck CTA at our hospital be-tween June 2024 and March 2025 were enrolled and divided into three groups by random number table method.Group A underwent conventional scanning at 110 kVp.group B underwent dual-energy scanning(90 kV/Sn 150 kV).group C underwent large-pitch scanning at 80 kVp.The volume of contrast medium was 70 ml for group A and group B,and 50 ml for group C.The CT attenuation values and image noise(SD)of the lumen were measured at the aortic arch,bilateral carotid artery bifurcations,internal carotid ar-tery origins,and proximal middle cerebral arteries.The signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR),subjective im-age quality scores,and effective dose(ED)were compared among the three groups.One-way ANOVA or non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to calculate intergroup differences for quantitative metrics.Cohen's Kappa test was adopted to evalu-ate the consistency of subjective quality scores between two readers.Results The CT values of target vessels in groups B and C were significantly higher than those in group A(P<0.05).The CT values in all three groups exceeded 350 HU,meeting diagnos-tic requirements.Statistically significant differences(P<0.05)were observed among the three groups for SNR and CNR in the aortic arch,bilateral carotid arteries,and internal carotid arteries,as well as for CNR in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries.No significant difference was found for SNR in the middle cerebral arteries(P>0.05).The mean subjective image quality scores were(3.62±0.60),(3.48±0.61),and(3.50±0.70)for groups A,B,and C,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Inter-reader agreement for image evaluation was excellent(Kappa=0.782,P<0.05).The effective radiation doses were(1.22±0.14)mSv,(0.74±0.08)mSv,and(0.23±0.04)mSv for groups A,B,and C,respectively,demonstrating statis-tically significant differences(P<0.05).Group C used 20 ml less contrast medium than groups A and B.Conclusion Head and neck CTA with low tube voltage and large-pitch scanning reduces patient radiation exposure and contrast medium volume while maintaining diagnostic image quality,demonstrating its clinical feasibility.
温兆意;庄艳妮;张雪峰
深圳市宝安区中心医院放射科,广东 深圳 518102深圳市宝安区中心医院放射科,广东 深圳 518102深圳市宝安区中心医院放射科,广东 深圳 518102
医药卫生
头颈部CT血管成像低管电压大螺距双源CT辐射剂量
head and neck CTAlow-tube-voltagelarge-pitchdual-source CTradiation dose
《四川医学》 2026 (4)
388-393,6
深圳市宝安区医疗卫生科研项目(编号:2023JD076)深圳市宝安区医学会医疗卫生科研项目(编号:BAYXH2023070)
评论