首页|期刊导航|农业工程学报|基于土壤水盐运移与葵花生长响应的盐渍农田灌溉模式优化

基于土壤水盐运移与葵花生长响应的盐渍农田灌溉模式优化OA

Optimization of irrigation regimes in salinized farmland based on soil water-salt transport and sunflower growth response

中文摘要英文摘要

针对中国大型干旱盐渍化灌区春灌与夏浇脱节、土壤水盐运移规律不清等问题,于 2023-2024年在河套灌区设计灌溉模式田间小区控制试验.试验主区为非生育期春灌处理(S1:120 mm,S2:240 mm),副区为葵花生育期灌溉处理(2023年:畦灌 B90、滴灌 D90;2024年:滴灌 D90、D120、D150),分析 0~100 cm土层的含水率、脱盐率及葵花叶片光合生理特征与产量的关系,提出了节水控盐增产效果较优的春灌夏浇灌溉模式.结果表明:1)春灌240 mm提高了 0~60 cm土层初始含水率和脱盐效果,但会加剧 80~100 cm积盐风险.生育期滴灌较畦灌有效改善了土壤水分分布.2)同一春灌水量下,滴灌处理的叶片气体交换参数普遍优于传统畦灌,开花期的净光合速率与蒸腾速率均达到峰值;而无夏浇处理现蕾期气孔导度降至最低,且成熟期胞间 CO2 浓度较滴灌高 24.15%.3)过量夏浇(S2D150)较适量夏浇(S2D90)减产,水分利用效率降低;适度春灌配合滴灌(S1D90)在维持较高产量的同时,在所有滴灌处理中实现了最高的水分利用效率(2024年为 14.57 kg/(mm·hm2)).综上,适度春灌(120 mm)配合覆膜滴灌(90 mm)可在保证产量同时实现土壤水盐协同调控,是适合河套灌区盐碱地葵花非生育期与生育期统筹节水压盐的灌溉模式.

Growing season irrigation can contribute to water resource in the representative large-scale arid saline irrigation area in China, such as the Hetao Irrigation District. It is very necessary to decouple the spring (non-growing season) and summer(growing season) irrigation in sustainable agriculture. Conventional practices can rely heavily on the spring flushing to leach salts, followed by disjointed summer irrigation, leading to inefficient water use. It is still unclear about soil water-salt transport patterns. This study aims to integrate these two phases into a coherent system for optimal irrigation. A systematic investigation was made to explore the synergistic effects of spring irrigation quotas and summer drip irrigation schedules on soil salinity profiles and sunflower physiology. An optimal regime was identified to balance the water conservation, salinity control, and yield stability. A field plot experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2023-2024) at a 1 333 ha experimental station in Longxingchang Town, Wuyuan County, Inner Mongolia, China. There was the semi-arid temperate continental climate (altitude 1 022 m; mean annual temperature 6.1℃; evaporation-to-precipitation ratio >10). A split-plot design was employed to isolate the effects of the spring irrigation (Main plots: S1: 120 mm, and S2: 240 mm) and summer irrigation (Sub-plots). The treatments were compared: border irrigation (B90) against drip irrigation (D90) in 2023; Drip irrigation gradients(D90, D120, and D150) were expanded in 2024. Key parameters were measured, including the soil moisture and salt content in the 0-100 cm profile, sunflower photosynthetic parameters (LAI, Pn, Tr, and Gs), and yield components. The results revealed that there was better balance in soil-water-salt dynamics and crop performance. Soil Salinity Dynamics: The significant vertical stratification was observed in the interaction between spring flushing and summer drip irrigation in soil salinity. High spring irrigation (S2, 240 mm) with fractional drip irrigation (D120) achieved the highest desalination rate in the shallow root zone(0~40 cm). This regime exacerbated the risk of secondary salinization in the deep soil layer (>80~100 cm), where the salt content increased, due to the "piston flow" effect without adequate drainage. Conversely, drip irrigation significantly optimized the horizontal salt distribution, whereas the surface salt accumulation was reduced, compared with the border irrigation.Physiological Mechanisms: Crop physiological responses were linked to the optimal rhizosphere environment. Drip irrigation treatments maintained significantly higher leaf area index (LAI) and net photosynthetic rates (Pn) than border irrigation under identical spring irrigation. Notably, drip irrigation alleviated water stress to enhance the leaf transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) during the grain-filling stage. The precise water delivery reduced the inhibition of cytokinin activity and root vitality under salt stress. Yield Optimization: There was a threshold effect during irrigation. While the S2 initially provided a low-salt environment, leading to the nutrient leaching and deep-layer salt stress, with an 8.2% yield penalty, compared with moderate spring irrigation. The moderate spring irrigation (S1, 120 mm) and medium drip irrigation (D90) were combined to emerge as the superior strategy. The S1 was sufficient for the desalinated seedling establishment zone (0~40 cm), while the D90 maintained the optimal moisture without the deep percolation, resulting in the highest crop water use efficiency and stable yields. The disconnection between spring and summer irrigation can be resolved for integrated production. Moderate spring irrigation (120 mm) with mulched drip irrigation (90 mm) also achieved the synergistic regulation of soil water and salt. A favorable root zone environment was formed to minimize the deep-layer salt accumulation and water wastage. Consequently, it is recommended as the standard irrigation protocol for the sustainable sunflower production in the saline-alkali lands of the Hetao Irrigation Districts.

石宇婷;杨威;屈忠义;张如鑫;李二珍;张晓敏;杨少东;季文涛;秦健杰

内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018||内蒙古农业大学草业学院/草地资源教育部重点实验室,呼和浩特 010011内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018||内蒙古科技大学能源与环境学院,包头 014010内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018五原县农牧业技术推广中心,巴彦淖尔 015100内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018江苏省水利勘测设计研究院有限公司,扬州 225127内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特 010018内蒙古科技大学能源与环境学院,包头 014010

农业科技

河套灌区灌溉模式水盐运移脱盐率叶片气体交换参数

Hetao Irrigation Districtirrigation regimewater and salt transportdesalination rateleaf gas exchange parameters

《农业工程学报》 2026 (6)

106-116,11

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC3201202)内蒙古自治区自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(2025YQ010)内蒙古自治区一流学科专项资助项目(YLXKZXNND-032)内蒙古自治区"英才兴蒙"工程项目

10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202506225

评论