AIGC时代下版权审计对象和方法重构OACHSSCD
Reconstructing Copyright Audit Subjects and Methods in the Era of AIGC
人工智能生成内容的发展改变了内容生产方式,并对传统以作品结果核验为中心的版权审计模式提出挑战.既有审计逻辑建立在创作主体明确、权利来源清晰与生成过程可追溯的基础之上,在 AIGC 时代下,生成过程高度技术化与黑箱化,主体资格认定、训练数据合法性以及输出权利归属均呈现结构性不确定,传统审计方法难以有效回应.版权审计的对象应从作品本身转变为由主体资格、输入权利链和输出权利链的结构.在审计方法上,应从"结果导向"转为"过程导向",适度引入前瞻性风险识别,并将"证据最小集"作为支点,通过保留创作意图、生成记录及来源数据等信息,为版权审计提供事实依据,为应对 AIGC 带来的版权审计的挑战提供方法论参考.
The rise of generative artificial intelligence has reshaped content production,and in doing so,challenged traditional copyright audi-ting models built around the examination of completed works.Conventional auditing presumes identifiable authorship,clear rights provenance,and traceable creation processes.In the AIGC context,however,content is produced through complex and often opaque technical systems.Questions of subject qualification,the legality of training data,and the allocation of rights in generated outputs arise at a structural level,and cannot be adequately addressed through work-centered review alone.In response,the scope of copyright auditing must extend beyond individual outputs to the broader con-figuration of subject status,input rights chains,and output risk control.This shift entails moving from a model focused primarily on verifying results to one that examines the conditions under which generation occurs.Mechanisms such as risk allocation rules,red-flag testing,and the establishment of a"minimal evidence set"can provide a reasonably verifiable basis for assessing generative activities without requiring exhaustive technical scrutiny.By retaining information such as creative intention,generation records,and source data,a factual basis for copyright auditing can be provided.This provides a methodological reference for addressing the challenges of copyright auditing brought by AIGC.
李子杰
中南财经政法大学 知识产权研究中心,湖北 武汉 430073
社会科学
生成式人工智能版权审计过程不确定性证据最小集权利链
Generative Artificial IntelligenceCopyright AuditingProcess UncertaintyMinimum Evidence SetRights Chain
《牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (2)
74-82,9
评论