中国中老年全职劳动人群的衰弱流行现状及与劳动时长的关系OA
Prevalence of frailty and its relationship with working hours among full-time middle-aged and older workers in China
[背景]衰弱是导致跌倒、失能及死亡的重要前因.目前缺乏劳动时长对衰弱影响的流行病学证据. [目的]探讨中国中老年全职劳动人群中衰弱的流行情况,以及衰弱与劳动时长的关系. [方法]数据来源于 2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS),纳入 45岁及以上且周工作时长超过 35 h的全职劳动人群为研究对象.采用衰弱指数(FI)来评估衰弱状态.首先,基于广义相加模型(GAM)探索劳动时长与 FI关联的效应趋势.其次,采用 t检验、χ2 检验和 Jon-ckheere-Terpstra 趋势检验进行单因素分析.引入限制性立方样条(RCS)进行建模,并基于有序 logistic回归模型,通过逐步引入协变量的方法进行校正,分析不同周工作时长组别间衰弱检出率是否存在差异.最后,基于潜在的风险因素进行亚组分析. [结果]本研究共纳入 5 504名受访者,平均年龄(56.41±7.30)岁,女性 2 304名(41.86%).共807名参与者(14.66%)处于衰弱状态,2 686名参与者(48.80%)处于衰弱前期状态.以第七次全国人口普查数据进行性别、年龄标化后,衰弱检出率 18.89%,衰弱前期检出率 47.25%.非管理(73.73%)、农业(64.06%)和非受雇(65.68%)类职业在衰弱人群中比例更高.长时间工作的人群占比较大,其中周工作 41~60 h者 2 596人(47.17%),每周工作超过 60 h者 1 649名(29.96%),仅 1 259人(22.87%)每周工作 35~40 h.GAM分析显示周工作时长与 FI存在非线性关系.RCS分析显示,周工作时长与衰弱等级之间存在关联(P=0.022).logistic回归分析显示:每周工作超过 60 h者衰弱检出的风险比 41~60 h者增加 23%(OR=1.23,95%CI:1.09~1.38,P<0.01);每周工作 35~40 h者检出衰弱的风险升高 15%(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.01~1.31,P=0.034).亚组分析发现周工作时长超过 60 h与衰弱的正向关联总体上未因性别、年龄、城乡户口、职业属性、行业类型和雇佣关系而改变,尽管该关联在非农村户口及 60岁及以上人群中未达到统计学显著性. [结论]中国中老年全职人群衰弱检出率较高,且每周工作超过 60 h的人群处于更衰弱状态的风险更高,建议针对长时间工作的群体进行衰弱的预防和管理,并关注工作时长对衰弱的作用.
[Background]Frailty serves as a significant precursor to falls,disability,and mortality.Epidemio-logical evidence examining the impact of working hours on frailty remains scarce. [Objective]To explore the prevalence of frailty and the relationship between frailty and working hours among full-time middle-aged and older workers in China. [Methods]Data were derived from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS).The study included full-time workers aged 45 years and above with a weekly working duration exceeding 35 h.Frailty was assessed using the Frailty Index(FI).First,the dose-response relationship between working hours and FI was explored using a generalized additive model(GAM).Second,univariate analyses were performed using t-tests,χ2 tests,and the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.Restricted cubic splines(RCS)were introduced for modeling.Based on ordinal logistic regression models,covariates were adjusted sequentially to examine whether differences in frailty prevalence existed across different weekly working hour categories.Finally,subgroup analyses were performed. [Results]Among the 5 504 included participants,the mean age was(56.41±7.30)years,with 2 304 being female(41.86%).A total of 807 participants(14.66%)were identified as frail,and 2 686 participants(48.80%)were pre-frail.After standardization for gender and age ac-cording to the seventh national census data,the standardized prevalence of frailty and prefrailty were 18.89%and 47.25%,respectively.Significant higher proportions of frail individuals were found among those in non-managerial(73.73%),agricultural(64.06%),and non-employed(65.68%)occupations.Long working hours were prevalent:2 596(47.17%)workers worked 41-60 h per week,1 649(29.96%)worked>60 h per week,and only 1 259(22.87%)worked 35-40 h per week.GAM analysis showed a non-linear relationship between weekly working hours and FI.Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a statistically significant association between weekly working hours and frailty status(P=0.022).Logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals working more than 60 h per week had a 23%higher odds of frailty compared to those working 41-60 h(OR=1.23,95%CI:1.09,1.38,P<0.01),while those working 35-40 h per week showed a 15%higher odds of frailty(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.01,1.31,P=0.034).The subgroup analysis revealed that the positive association between working more than 60 h per week and frailty remained generally consistent across sex,age,urban/rural residence,occupational at-tributes,industry,or employment type,although the association did not reach statistical significance among non-rural residents and indi-viduals aged 60 years and older. [Conclusion]The prevalence of frailty among full-time middle-aged and older labor force in China is relatively high,and the odds of frailty increases significantly among those who work more than 60 h per week.It is recommended to implement frailty prevention and management strategies targeting long-working-hour workers and to prioritize the impact of working duration on frailty.
石晓楠;赵艺皓;郭帅;祖力亚尔·塔力甫;郑晓瑛
中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 群医学及公共卫生学院,北京 100730||中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 人口健康与老龄科学系,北京 100730中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 群医学及公共卫生学院,北京 100730||中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 人口健康与老龄科学系,北京 100730中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 群医学及公共卫生学院,北京 100730||中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 人口健康与老龄科学系,北京 100730中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 人口健康与老龄科学系,北京 100730中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 群医学及公共卫生学院,北京 100730||亚太经合组织健康科学研究院,北京 100871
医药卫生
中老年劳动力长时间工作衰弱中国健康与养老追踪调查
middle-aged and elderlylabor forcelong working hoursfrailtyChina Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
《环境与职业医学》 2026 (4)
427-434,8
国家自然科学基金专项项目(L2424304)中国医学科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2022-ZHCH330-01)
评论