首页|期刊导航|吉首大学学报(自然科学版)|强震区软弱围岩矩形隧道减震层不同布置范围的减震效果

强震区软弱围岩矩形隧道减震层不同布置范围的减震效果OA

Damping Effect of Different Damping Layer Arrangements for Rectangular Tunnels with Weak Surrounding Rocks in Strong Seismic Areas

中文摘要英文摘要

为了提升软弱围岩地层的浅埋矩形隧道在受强震影响时的安全性,利用有限元软件ABAQUS对某工程矩形隧道减震层不同布置范围的减震效果进行了对比分析.结果表明,与无减震层的工况1相比,增加管片结构后,工况2(垫层减震层)、工况3(半包减震层)、工况4(全包减震层)的减震效果均明显提升,工况3的减震效果最优;与工况1相比,工况3的最大主应力峰值、最小主应力峰值、最大剪应力、最大横向位移、最大竖向位移、最小安全系数减震效果分别提升了8.893%,13.433%,5.698%,15.190%,41.860%,27.590%.因此,在抗震设计中,建议该工程优先采用半包减震层的构造方案.

In order to improve the safety of shallow buried rectangular tunnels with weak surrounding rocks when subjected to strong earthquakes,a comparative analysis of the seismic damping effect of rec-tangular tunnels with different damping layer arrangements is carried out using the finite element soft-ware ABAQUS.The results show that compared with the condition without damping layer(condition 1),after adding the segmental structure,the damping effects of condition 2(cushion damping layer),con-dition 3(semi-covered damping layer),and condition 4(full-covered damping layer)were significantly improved,and condition 3 had the best damping effect.Compared with condition 1,the maximum princi-pal stress peak,minimum principal stress peak,maximum shear stress,maximum lateral displacement,maximum vertical displacement,and minimum safety factor of the damping effect in condition 3 increased by 8.893%,13.433%,5.698%,15.190%,41.860%,and 27.590%respectively.In seismic design,a semi-covered seismic damping layer construction scheme is recommended.

梁为进;崔光耀;宁茂权

北方工业大学土木工程学院,北京 100144北方工业大学土木工程学院,北京 100144中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430064||海峡(福建)交通工程设计有限公司,福建 福州 350004

交通工程

矩形隧道强震区软弱围岩减震层减震效果

rectangular tunnelsstrong seismic areasweak surrounding rockdamping layerdamping effect

《吉首大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (2)

54-61,8

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52178378)

10.13438/j.cnki.jdzk.2026.02.008

评论