首页|期刊导航|腹腔镜外科杂志|经胸前入路腔镜单侧甲状腺癌整块切除与常规腔镜手术的临床疗效比较

经胸前入路腔镜单侧甲状腺癌整块切除与常规腔镜手术的临床疗效比较OA

Comparison of clinical efficacy between transthoracic endoscopic en bloc resection of unilateral thyroid cancer and conventional endoscopic surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨经胸前入路腔镜甲状腺癌整块切除与常规腔镜手术治疗单侧甲状腺乳头状癌的临床疗效.方法:回顾分析2021 年6 月至2024 年7 月收治的86 例单侧甲状腺乳头状癌患者的临床资料,均行经胸前入路腔镜单侧甲状腺癌根治术,根据手术方式分为整块切除组与常规组,每组43 例.比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、病理学指标(清扫淋巴结数量、阳性淋巴结数量)、术后疼痛评分、并发症及甲状旁腺功能指标(术后甲状旁腺激素与血钙水平).结果:整块切除组手术时间短于常规组[(85.6±10.2)min vs.(96.8±12.1)min],术中出血量[(18.7±3.9)mL vs.(22.4±4.1)mL]、术后引流量[(41.2±6.8)mL vs.(47.6±7.2)mL]少于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).两组清扫淋巴结数量[(3.3±0.5)vs.(3.2±0.6)]、阳性淋巴结数量[(0.9±0.3)vs.(0.8±0.3)]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后第1 天、第2 天疼痛评分及并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).整块切除组术后 24 h 甲状旁腺激素水平[(35.6±8.1)pg/mL vs.(28.2±7.5)pg/mL]、血钙水平[(2.18±0.12)mmol/L vs.(2.05±0.15)mmol/L]均高于常规组(P<0.05).两组低钙血症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:经胸前入路腔镜单侧甲状腺癌整块切除术在缩短手术时间、减少术中出血与术后引流量方面具有一定优势,有助于术中清晰显露喉返神经并保护甲状旁腺功能,且未增加并发症发生率,不影响肿瘤根治的安全性.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of transthoracic endoscopic en bloc resection versus conventional en-doscopic surgery for unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 86 patients with unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma admitted from Jun.2021 to Jul.2024.All patients underwent transthoracic en-doscopic radical resection of unilateral thyroid carcinoma,and were divided into an en bloc resection group and a conventional group,with 43 patients in each group.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,pathological indicators(number of lymph nodes dissected,number of positive lymph nodes),postoperative pain score,complications,and parathyroid function indicators(postoperative parathyroid hormone and serum calcium levels)were compared between the two groups.Results:The operative time in the en bloc resection group was shorter than that in the conventional group[(85.6±10.2)min vs.(96.8±12.1)min],the in-traoperative blood loss[(18.7±3.9)mL vs.(22.4±4.1)mL]and postoperative drainage volume[(41.2±6.8)mL vs.(47.6±7.2)mL]in the en bloc resection group were less than those in the conventional group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.001).There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissected[(3.3±0.5)vs.(3.2±0.6)]and the number of positive lymph nodes[(0.9±0.3)vs.(0.8±0.3)](P>0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in pain scores on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days or the total incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).The parathyroid hormone level[(35.6±8.1)pg/mL vs.(28.2±7.5)pg/mL]and serum calcium level[(2.18±0.12)mmol/L vs.(2.05±0.15)mmol/L]in the en bloc resection group at 24 h postoperatively were higher than those in the conven-tional group(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of hypocalcemia between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Transthoracic endoscopic en bloc resection for unilateral thyroid cancer has certain advantages in shortening the operative time,reducing intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume.It helps to clearly expose the recurrent laryn-geal nerve and protect parathyroid function during the operation,without increasing the incidence of complications or affecting the safety of tumor radical treatment.

王松;吴峰;陈昊;王亚园;安秋冬;沈浩伟;孙浩杰;王宙;张艳;邢栋

河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000河南中医药大学第一附属医院普通外科,河南 郑州,450000

医药卫生

甲状腺癌,乳头状甲状腺切除术内窥镜检查经胸前入路整块切除临床疗效

Thyroid cancer,papillaryThyroidectomyEndoscopyTransthoracic approachEn bloc resectionClinical efficacy

《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2026 (3)

167-171,5

河南省卫生健康委员会国家中医药传承创新联合共建科研专项任务书(2024ZXZX1101)国家中医优势专科建设项目[国中医药医政函(2024)90号]河南省第三批中医药青苗人才项目[豫卫中医药科教(2024)4号]河南省卫生健康委员会国家中医药传承创新联合共建科研专项任务书(2024ZXZX1108)

10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2026.03.167

评论