深厚软土路基就地固化后快速填筑原位试验OA
FIELD TEST FOR STABILIZATION OF DEEP SOFT FOUNDATION UNDER RAPID FILLING CONDITION
淤泥浅层就地固化处理可形成人工固化硬壳层,能够有效提高淤泥层强度,减少换填和桩桩基等施工带来的问题、是非常有效软基处理方法.本文依据广东潮汕地区某深厚淤泥质软土路基试验段,开展深厚淤泥质软基就地固化原位试验研究,评估就地固化6 m后快速填筑条件下其地基处理效果,并建立数值模型研究就地固化厚度、固化层模量和堆载高度对处理效果的影响.现场研究表明就地固化6 m后能够有效减少土层压缩变形量,控制填土荷载可能引起的表层水平位移和地基隆起.数值模拟进一步显示,堆载下沉降量随固化层厚度增长逐渐下降且呈非线性变化,而随固化土模量增加略微减小,外荷载对沉降和孔压的变化起到控制作用.同时,不同固化厚度的地基沉降量对模量变化的敏感性具有显著差异性,较大固化厚度时沉降量对模量较为敏感,沉降差异来源于固化土压缩量.弹性模量和固化厚度均对就地固化地基沉降量产生影响,比较发现固化层厚度对沉降的影响较弹性模量更明显.弹性模量与水泥掺量呈线性相关,水泥-淤泥固化土弹性模量在10 MPa、20 MPa、40 MPa、60 MPa对应的水泥掺量分别为4%~5%、6%~7%、9%~10%、11%~12%.数值模拟显示,本案例的最经济弹性模量为28 MPa,对应的水泥掺入比为8%,最经济固化厚度为3.2 m.
In-situ stabilization of shallow silt layers can form an artificial hard crust,effectively improving strength and reducing engineering issues during construction and service.Based on a field test in the Chaoshan area of Guangdong,this study evaluated the treatment effect of a 6 m in-situ stabilized layer under rapid post-stabilization filling.A numerical model was established to investigate the influence of stabilization thickness,elastic modulus,and loading on the treatment performance.Field observations indicated that the 6 m stabilization effectively reduced compression of the soft layer and controlled horizontal and uplift displacements induced by the fill load.Numerical simulations further showed that settlement decreases nonlinearly with increasing stabilization thickness and modulus.The magnitude of the applied load dominated both settlement and excess pore-water pressure in the foundation.It was also found that both elastic modulus and stabilization thickness affect settlement of the in-situ stabilized foundation,but settlement sensitivity to thickness differs markedly from that to modulus.With greater stabilization thickness,settlement becomes more sensitive to changes in modulus.Additionally,stabilization thickness has a more pronounced impact on settlement than elastic modulus.Elastic modulus is linearly related to cement content:cement-silt stabilized soil with moduli of 10 MPa,20 MPa,40 MPa,and 60 MPa corresponds to cement contents of 4%~5%,6%~7%,9%~10%,and 11%~12%,respectively.Numerical analysis suggests that for this case the most economical elastic modulus is 28 MPa(corresponding to a cement content of about 8%)and the most economical stabilization thickness is 3.2 m.
周洋;刘大虎;李国维;贺冠军
河南工业大学,郑州 450001,中国河南工业大学,郑州 450001,中国河海大学,南京 210098,中国中榕规划设计有限公司,长沙 410000,中国
建筑与水利
就地固化快速堆载现场试验数值模拟压缩变形固化厚度
In-situ stabilizationRapid loadingField testNumerical simulationCompression deformationStabilization thickness
《工程地质学报》 2026 (2)
817-826,10
国家自然科学基金项目(资助号:42177126),河南工业大学青年骨干教师项目(资助号:21420194),郑州市R&D专项经费补助科研项目(资助号:22ZZRDZX38).This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.42177126),Henan University of Technology Young Backbone Teachers Project(Grant No.21420194)and Zhengzhou City R&D Special Funds Subsidized Scientific Research Projects(Grant No.22ZZRDZX38).
评论