首页|期刊导航|磁共振成像|T1-mapping与RESOLVE DWI在中轴型脊柱关节炎骶髂关节炎症活动性定量评估中的比较研究

T1-mapping与RESOLVE DWI在中轴型脊柱关节炎骶髂关节炎症活动性定量评估中的比较研究OA

Comparative study of T1-mapping and RESOLVE DWI in the quantitative assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammatory activity in axial spondyloarthritis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较Tl-mapping与分段读出平面回波弥散加权成像(readout segmentation of long variable echo-train diffusion-weighted imaging,RESOLVE DWI)技术在定量评估中轴型脊柱关节炎(axial spondyloarthropathy,axSpA)骶髂关节炎症活动性水平的诊断效能,旨在为临床提供更具价值的定量指标.材料与方法 回顾性收集2017年6月至2024年6月于福州大学附属省立医院风湿科确诊的74例axSpA患者为病例组,19例因机械性下腰痛接受骶髂关节MRI检查者为对照组.病例组中依据强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分(Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score,ASDAS)分为活动组(n=40)与非活动组(n=34).所有研究对象均行骶髂关节常规MRI检查及T1-mapping与RESOLVE DWI定量技术检查,同步测量两组骶髂关节软骨下骨髓的 T1-mapping值、表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)(b=50、500、700 s/mm2,记为 ADC50,500,700).比较对照组、病例组及其亚组(非活动组和活动组)间Tl-mapping值与ADC50,500,700值的差异,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析T1-mapping、ADC50,500,700在不同组间的诊断效能,并计算曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC).DeLong检验用于比较二组间AUC值的差异.结果 病例组、非活动组、活动组骶髂关节关节软骨下骨髓的T1-mapping值与ADC50,500,700值均高于对照组(均P<0.001).活动组骶髂关节关节软骨下骨髓的T1-mapping值与ADC50,500,700值高于非活动组(P<0.05).在区分对照组与病例组中,T1-mapping与ADC50,500,700的AUC分别为0.889和0.877;在区分对照组与非活动组中,AUC分别为0.811和0.828;在区分对照组与活动组中,AUC分别为0.955和0.918,均显示出良好的诊断效能,经DeLong检验差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);在区分非活动组与活动组时,T1-mapping的AUC为0.808,而ADC50,500,700的AUC为0.693,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.042).结论 T1-mapping与RESOLVE DWI技术均能够较好地评估axSpA骶髂关节炎症活动性水平,且在区分axSpA患者非活动组与活动组评估中,T1-mapping技术效能更优.

Objective:This study compares the diagnostic efficacy of T1-mapping and readout segmentation of long variable echo-train diffusion-weighted imaging(RESOLVE DWI)techniques in quantitatively assessing sacroiliac joint inflammation activity levels in axial spondyloarthropathy(axSpA),aiming to provide clinicians with more valuable quantitative indicators.Materials and Methods:The retrospective cohort study included 74 patients diagnosed with axial spondyloarthropathy(axSpA)at the Department of Rheumatology,Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Fuzhou University between June 2017 and June 2024,forming the case group.A control group comprised 19 individuals who underwent sacroiliac joint MRI examinations for mechanical low back pain.Within the case group,participants were further categorised into an active group(n=40)and an inactive group(n=34)based on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score(ASDAS).All research subjects underwent conventional MRI,T1-mapping,and RESOLVE DWI quantitative technical inspection.T1-mapping values and apparent diffusion coefficient(b=50,500,700 s/mm2,denoted as ADC50,500,700)of the subchondral bone marrow in the sacroiliac joints were measured simultaneously across both groups.Comparisons were made between the control group,case group,and its subgroups(inactive and active groups)regarding differences in T1-mapping values and ADC50,500,700 values.The diagnostic efficacy of T1-mapping and ADC50,500,700 across groups was analysed using receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,and the area under the curve(AUC)was calculated.The DeLong test was used to compare the differences in AUC values between the two groups.Results:The T1-mapping values and ADC50,500,700 values of the subchondral bone marrow in the sacroiliac joint were higher in the case group,inactive group,and active group than in the control group(P<0.001 for all comparisons).The T1-mapping values and ADC50,500,700 values of the subchondral bone marrow in the sacroiliac joint of the active group were higher than those in the inactive group(P<0.05).In distinguishing the control group from the case group,the AUC values for T1-mapping and ADC50,500,700 were 0.889 and 0.877 respectively;when differentiating the control group from the inactive group,the AUC values were 0.811 and 0.828 respectively.In distinguishing the control group from the active group,the AUC values were 0.955 and 0.918 respectively,both demonstrating good diagnostic performance.The Delong test indicated no statistically significant difference between them(all P>0.05).When distinguishing between inactive and active groups,the AUC for T1-mapping was 0.808,whereas the AUC for ADC50,500.700 was 0.693,with a statistically significant difference(P=0.042).Conclusions:Both T1-mapping and RESOLVE DWI techniques effectively assess the level of sacroiliac joint inflammation activity in axial spondyloarthritis(axSpA).However,T1-mapping demonstrates superior efficacy in distinguishing between inactive and active groups among axSpA patients.

张潇;杨晟升;陈贤源;方坤华;俞顺

福建中医药大学中西医结合学院中西医结合研究院,福州 350122||福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院放射科,福州大学附属省立医院放射科,福州 350001福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院放射科,福州大学附属省立医院放射科,福州 350001福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院放射科,福州大学附属省立医院放射科,福州 350001||福州市第二医院妇幼保健院放射科,福州 350008福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院放射科,福州大学附属省立医院放射科,福州 350001||福建省龙岩市第二医院放射科,龙岩 364000福建中医药大学中西医结合学院中西医结合研究院,福州 350122||福建医科大学省立临床医学院,福建省立医院放射科,福州大学附属省立医院放射科,福州 350001||福建省医疗大数据工程重点实验室,福州 350001

医药卫生

中轴型脊柱关节炎磁共振成像T1-mapping弥散加权成像骨髓水肿定量评估

axial spondyloarthritismagnetic resonance imagingT1-mappingdiffusion-weighted imagingbone marrow edemaquantitative assessment

《磁共振成像》 2026 (4)

101-108,8

福建省财政厅科技计划项目(编号:2023248)福建省卫生健康科技计划项目(编号:2024XA007)Fujian Provincial Department of Finance Science and Technology Programme Project(No.2023248)Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Provincial Health Commission(No.2024XA007).

10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.04.014

评论