首页|期刊导航|磁共振成像|三种不同扩散成像序列在急性脑梗死检查中的用时及图像质量对比研究

三种不同扩散成像序列在急性脑梗死检查中的用时及图像质量对比研究OA

A comparative study on acquisition time and image quality of three different diffusion imaging sequences in the examination of acute cerebral infarction

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较单次激发扩散加权成像(single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging,SS-DWI)、分段读出高清扩散加权成像(readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted imaging,Resolve-DWI)和同时多层采集联合分段读出高清扩散加权成像(Resolve-DWI with simultaneous multi-slice,SMS-Resolve-DWI)序列在急性脑梗死MRI检查中的用时及图像质量,旨在为优化临床扫描方案提供证据.材料与方法 选取2023年7月至2024年12月于本院治疗的84例急性脑梗死患者,依次行SS-DWI、Resolve-DWI及SMS-Resolve-DWI扫描,由2名高年资放射科医师采用5分制Likert量表对图像质量进行独立盲法评价.客观指标包括测量信号强度(signal intensity,SI)、表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)、信噪比(signal-to-noise ratio,SNR)、对比度比(contrast ratio,CR)、对比噪声比(contrast-to-noise ratio,CNR)及 SNR效率.采用 SPSS 26.0软件进行统计分析,计量资料经Shapiro-Wilk检验评估正态性,符合正态分布者以均数±标准差表示,不符合者以中位数(四分位数间距)表示;依据数据分布情况选用单因素方差分析或Kruskal-WallisH检验进行比较,观察者间一致性通过加权Kappa检验评估.结果 SS-DWI、Resolve-DWI及SMS-Resolve-DWI 的扫描时长分别为 1 min 57 s、5 min 21s、3 min 16 s.两名评价者主观评分结果一致性较好至优秀(Kappa值0.630~0.982).在图像质量主观评分上,SMS-Resolve-DWI与Resolve-DWI均优于SS-DWI(P<0.05),且前二者评分相近(总体评分中位数均为4分).在客观指标方面,三组序列的ADC测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与 SS-DWI相比,Resolve-DWI 与 SMS-Resolve-DWI在 SI病灶、SI对侧、SNR及 CNR上均显著提升(P<0.001),但二者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).SS-DWI 的 CR 高于 SMS-Resolve-DWI(P=0.013).SS-DWI 与 SMS-Resolve-DWI 的SNR效率均优于Resolve-DWI(P<0.001),二者间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 SMS-Resolve-DWI兼具SS-DWI的扫描效率与Resolve-DWI的图像质量,并保持了 ADC定量评估的准确性,可作为急性脑梗死MRI检查的推荐方案.

Objective:To compare the acquisition time and image quality of three diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)sequences,including single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging(SS-DWI),readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted imaging(Resolve-DWI),and Resolve-DWI with simultaneous multi-slice(SMS-Resolve-DWI),in MRI examinations of acute cerebral infarction,with the aimof providing evidence for optimizing clinical scanning protocols.Materials and Methods:Eighty-four patients with acute cerebral infarction treated at our hospital from July 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled.Each patient underwent sequential scanning with conventional SS-DWI,Resolve-DWI,and SMS-Resolve-DWI.Two senior radiologists independently and blindly evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale.Objective metrics included signal intensity(SI),apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),contrast ratio(CR),contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR),and SNR efficiency.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0.The normality of continuous variables was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test.Data with normal distributions were expressed as mean±standard deviation,and those without were represented as median(interquartile range).One-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)or the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for group comparisons.Interobserver agreement was assessed with weighted Kappa statistics.Results:The scan times were 1 min 57 s for SS-DWI,5 min 21 s for Resolve-DWI,and 3 min 16 s for SMS-Resolve-DWI.Subjective scoring demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater agreement(Kappa values 0.630 to 0.982).In terms of image quality scores,both SMS-Resolve-DWI and Resolve-DWI showed significantly higher scores than SS-DWI(P<0.05),with no significant difference between the two advanced sequences(median Likert score of both was 4).Regarding objective metrics,there were no significant differences in ADC values among the three sequences(P>0.05).Compared to SS-DWI,both Resolve-DWI and SMS-Resolve-DWI showed higher SI(in both lesion and contralateral brain tissue),SNR,and CNR(P<0.001),with no significant difference between the two advanced sequences(P>0.05).The CR of SS-DWI was higher than that of SMS-Resolve-DWI(P=0.013).The SNR efficiency of SS-DWI and SMS-Resolve-DWI was superior to that of Resolve-DWI(P<0.001),with no significant difference between SS-DWI and SMS-Resolve-DWI(P>0.05).Conclusions:SMS-Resolve-DWI combines the scanning efficiency of SS-DWI with the image quality of Resolve-DWI,while maintaining the accuracy of ADC quantification.It can be recommended as the preferred MRI protocol for acute cerebral infarction examination.

李霆;卢远源;李传;赖茵圻;冯汝静;梁秀群;孙振萌;黄炎;邓德茂

广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021西门子数字医疗科技(上海)有限公司广州分公司磁共振客户应用部,广州 510000广西壮族自治区河池市第一人民医院放射科,河池 546300广西医学科学院·广西壮族自治区人民医院放射科,南宁 530021

医药卫生

急性脑梗死磁共振成像扩散加权成像分段读出同时多层采集图像质量

acute cerebral infarctionmagnetic resonance imagingdiffusion-weighted imagingreadout segmentation of long variable echo-trainssimultaneous multi-sliceimage quality

《磁共振成像》 2026 (4)

88-94,7

广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题项目(编号:Z-A20230031)Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health Commission Self-Funded Scientific Research Project(No.Z-A20230031).

10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.04.012

评论