首页|期刊导航|中国针灸|近十年针刺治疗原发性失眠随机假针刺对照试验的质量评价

近十年针刺治疗原发性失眠随机假针刺对照试验的质量评价OA

Quality assessment on randomized sham-acupuncture controlled trials of acupuncture for primary insomnia over the past decade

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:系统评价针刺治疗原发性失眠(PI)随机假针刺对照试验的报告质量.方法:检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方数据知识服务平台(Wanfang)及PubMed(医学文献数据库)、CENTRAL(Cochrane 临床对照试验中心注册库)、EMbase(生物医学文献库)2014 年12 月31日至 2024年 12月 31日收录的针刺治疗PI的随机假针刺对照试验的文献.采用随机对照临床试验报告标准(CONSORT声明)、针刺临床试验干预措施报告标准(STRICTA标准)和假针刺对照报告指南与清单(SHARE 清单)对纳入的文献进行多维质量评估,计算各条目报告率及质量评分(QS).结果:共纳入文献 37 篇,其中中文文献 31 篇、英文文献 6 篇.涉及假针刺对照的形式有 8 种,以非刺入型假针刺和非效穴浅刺居多.基于CONSORT声明、STRICTA 标准、SHARE清单的QS中位数分别为16、11、8.基于CONSORT声明,中文文献报告率低于50%的条目占所有条目的62.16%(23/37),9 个条目报告率为0%,5个条目报告率为100%;英文文献报告率为0%的条目有7个,13个条目报告率为100%.基于STRICTA 标准,中文文献报告率低于 50%的条目占所有条目的 29.41%(5/17),无条目报告率为 0%,2 个条目报告率为 100%;英文文献报告率为0%的条目有 2 个,8个条目报告率为100%.基于SHARE清单,中文文献报告率低于50%的条目占68.42%(13/19),3个条目报告率为0%,无条目报告率为100%;英文文献报告率低于50%的条目占36.84%(7/19),3个条目报告率为0%,3个条目报告率为100%.结论:针刺治疗PI的随机假针刺对照试验报告质量整体不高,尤其在试验设计透明度、假针刺细节规范性和方法学严谨性方面亟待提升.建议未来研究严格遵循 CONSORT 声明、STRICTA标准及SHARE 清单,强化盲法实施、样本量计算及试验注册,以增强证据可靠性,推动针灸循证实践国际化.

Objective To systematically evaluate the reporting quality of randomized sham-acupuncture controlled trials of acupuncture for primary insomnia(PI).Methods From China Journal Full-text Database(CNKI),China Biomedical Literature Service System(SinoMed),VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP),and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform(Wanfang),and PubMed,CENTRAL,and EMbase,dated from December 31,2014,to December 31,2024,the articles of randomized sham-acupuncture controlled trials of acupuncture for PI were searched.Using the CONSORT statement,STRICTA guidelines,and SHARE checklist,the multidimensional assessment was performed for the quality of included articles,and the reporting rate of each item and the quality score(QS)were calculated.Results A total of 37 articles were included,of which 31 were in Chinese and 6 in English.There were 8 forms of sham-acupuncture control design,most of which referred to sham-acupuncture without penetrating into points or shallow acupuncture by inserting into non-effective points.Based on CONSORT statement,STRICTA guidelines,and SHARE checklist,the median of QS was 16,11 and 8,respectively.According to CONSORT statement,for the RCTs published in Chinese,62.16%(23/37)of items were below the reporting rate of 50%,the reporting rate of 9 items was 0%,and that of 5 items was 100%;and for those published in English,the reporting rate of 7 items was 0%and that of 13 items was 100%.Regarding STRICTA guidelines,for the RCTs published in Chinese,29.41%(5/17)of items were below the reporting rate of 50%,the reporting rate of 0 item was 0%,and that of 2 items was 100%;and for those published in English,the reporting rate of 0 item was 0%and that of 8 items was 100%.In view of SHARE checklist,for the RCTs published in Chinese,68.42%(13/19)of items were below the reporting rate of 50%,the reporting rate of 3 items was 0%,and that of 0 item was 100%;and for those published in English,36.84%(7/19)of items were below the reporting rate of 50%,the reporting rate of 3 items was 0%and that of 3 items was 100%.Conclusion The reporting quality of randomized sham-acupuncture controlled trials of acupuncture for PI shows overall non-completion,especially in trial design transparency,standardization of the details in sham-acupuncture,and methodological rigor.Future studies should strictly adhere to the CONSORT statement,STRICTA guidelines and SHARE checklist,strengthen the implementation of blinding,calculation of sample size,and trial registration,so as to enhance evidence reliability and promote the global practice of evidence-based acupuncture.

张博宇;高希言;高崚;褚文明;李赟;董莉

河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003河南中医药大学,郑州 450046||河南中医药大学第三附属医院,郑州 450003

原发性失眠针刺假针刺随机对照试验(RCT)CONSORT声明STRICTA标准SHARE清单报告质量评价

primary insomniaacupuncturesham-acupuncturerandomized controlled trial(RCT)CONSORT statementSTRICTA guidelinesSHARE checklistreporting quality evaluation

《中国针灸》 2026 (4)

644-654,11

国家自然科学基金资助项目:8247655河南省省级科技研发计划联合基金项目:2423014200902023 年度河南省"双一流"创建学科中医学科学研究专项项目:HSRP-DFCTCM-2023-3-14

10.13703/j.0255-2930.20250310-k0006

评论