故障模式影响及危害性分析与机器学习在生命支持设备风险管理中的研究OA
Study of FMECA combined with machine learning in risk management system for life support equipment
目的:构建基于故障模式影响及危害性分析(FMECA)联合机器学习驱动的风险分级管理体系,探讨其在医院血液透析设备运行管理中的应用效果.方法:采用FMECA方法对设备进行定性定量结合的风险评估,引入机器学习模型对设备风险等级进行预测和分类,从而实现对设备的风险分级管理.选取2023年至2024年上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院临床在用的46台血液透析机,将2023年1月至12月的设备管理采用传统的常规管理方法,2024年1月至12月的设备管理实施基于FMECA联合机器学习驱动的风险分级管理体系策略(风险分级管理方法).比较两种管理方法的设备临床使用管理效果、设备技术保障管理效果和设备运行维护安全性指标的差异.结果:采用风险分级管理方法的设备平均开机率为(94.63±4.95)%,高于常规管理方法的(91.79±5.24)%,差异有统计学意义(t=2.672,P<0.05),而设备平均相对运转率和周转率分别为(8.47±2.39)%和(9.58±2.67)%,均低于常规管理方法,差异均有统计学意义(t=11.739、11.313,P<0.05).采用风险分级管理方法的设备平均故障率低于常规管理方法,差异有统计学意义(t=12.098,P<0.05),而设备平均自主维修率和报废合规率高于常规管理方法,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.725、5.361,P<0.05).采用风险分级管理方法的设备平均压力故障发生率、电气故障发生率、循环系统故障发生率和平均清洁消毒不合格率均显著低于常规管理方法,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.004、10.261、10.407、14.324,P<0.05).结论:FMECA联合机器学习驱动的风险分级管理体系能显著提升生命支持设备的临床使用管理效果和设备技术保障效果,降低设备故障风险.
Objective:To establish a risk-stratified management system that was driven by failure modes effects and criticality analysis(FMECA)and machine learning,and to explore the application effect of that in the operation and management for hemodialysis equipment of hospital.Methods:The FMECA method was adopted to conduct a risk assessment that combined qualitative and quantitative assessment for equipment,which introduced a machine learning model to predict and classify the risk levels of the equipment,thereby realize risk-stratified management for equipment.A total of 46 hemodialysis machines in clinical use of Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from 2023 to 2024 were selected as the study subjects.The conventional management method was adopted to manage equipment during January 2023 and December 2024,and the strategy with risk-stratified management system(risk-stratified management method),which was driven by FMECA combined with machine learning,was adopted to manage equipment during January and December 2024.The differences of the management effect in clinical use,the management effect of technical support for equipment,and safety indicators of operation and maintenance for equipment between the two kinds of management methods were compared.Results:The average operation rate of equipment that adopted risk-stratified management method was(94.63±4.95)%,which was significantly higher than(91.79±5.24)%of conventional management method,and the difference was significant(t=2.672,P<0.05).However,the averagely relative operation rate and the turnover rate of equipment of risk-stratified management method were respectively(8.47±2.39)%and(9.58±2.67)%,which were lower than those of conventional management method,and the differences were significant(t=11.739,11.313,P<0.05).The average failure rate of equipment that received the risk-stratified management method was significantly lower than that of the conventional management method,and the difference was significant(t=12.098,P<0.05).The averagely self-repair rate and compliance rate of scrapping of the risk-stratified management method was higher than those of the conventional management method,and the differences were significant(t=3.752,5.361,P<0.05).The incidence of averagely pressure failure,incidence of electrical failure,incidence of failure in circulation system,and averagely defective rate of cleaning and disinfection of equipment that adopted risk-stratified management method were significantly lower than those that adopted conventional management method,and the differences were statistically significant(t=6.004,10.261,10.407,14.324,P<0.05).Conclusion:The risk-stratified management system that is driven by FMECA and machine learning can significantly improve the management effect,the effect of technical support for life support equipment in clinical use,which can reduce failure risk of equipment.
花毅;杜旻;胡静;徐军
上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院医学装备部 上海 200137上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院临床研究管理办公室 上海 200137上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院肾病科 上海 200137上海健康医学院医疗器械学院 上海 201318
医药卫生
故障模式影响及危害性分析(FMECA)机器学习风险分级管理生命支持设备
Failure mode effects and criticality analysis(FMECA)Machine learningRisk-stratified managementLife support equipment
《中国医学装备》 2026 (4)
130-135,6
评论