高复发风险黑色素瘤疾病进展监测中ctDNA、LDH与S100阳性率的Meta分析比较OA
A Meta-analysis comparing ctDNA,LDH,and S100 positivity rates in disease progression monitoring for high-risk melanoma
目的 对循环肿瘤 DNA、乳酸脱氢酶与 S100 蛋白三种血清学标志物在高复发风险黑色素瘤疾病进展监测中的阳性率进行综合比较,明确其检出效能的差异,为临床实践与研究方向提供循证依据.方法 系统检索中英文数据库 2015 年至 2025 年收录的文献,筛选出报告ⅡB/ⅡC、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期黑色素瘤患者疾病进展时上述标志物水平升高的前瞻性或回顾性观察性研究,采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)病例系列研究质量评价工具评估文献质量.使用随机效应模型进行单组率合并分析和标志物间的两两比较.结果 共纳入11 篇高质量研究,包含1 306 例患者.Meta 分析结果显示,ctDNA 的合并阳性率最高(68%,95%CI:0.61~0.74),且研究间无异质性(I2=0).LDH 的合并阳性率为 50.2%(95%CI:0.444~0.559),研究间亦无异质性(I2=0).S100 的合并阳性率最低(38%),但存在高度异质性(I2=85.9%).两两比较显示,ctDNA 阳性率显著高于 LDH 与 S100,LDH 阳性率亦显著高于 S100.S100 的异质性主要来源于疾病分期和国家差异.结论 在高复发风险黑色素瘤的疾病监测中,可优先将 ctDNA 作为高灵敏度、高稳定性的血清学标志物,以辅助评估肿瘤负荷与治疗反应.
Objective To comprehensively compare the positivity rates of three serological markers—circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),and S100 protein—in monitoring disease progression in high-recurrence-risk melanoma,and to clarify differences in their detection performance,thereby providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice and research.Methods A systematic search was conducted in multiple Chinese and English databases for literature published between 2015 and 2025.Prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting elevated levels of the above markers at disease progression in stage ⅡB/ⅡC/Ⅲ/Ⅳ melanoma patients were selected.Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute(JBI)critical appraisal tool for case series.A random-effects model was applied for single-group rate Meta-analysis and pairwise comparisons between markers.Results Eleven high-quality studies involving 1,306 patients were included.Meta-analysis showed that ctDNA had the highest pooled positivity rate(68%,95%CI:0.61-0.74)with no heterogeneity across studies(I2=0).The pooled positivity rate for LDH was 50.2%(95%CI:0.444-0.559),also without heterogeneity(I2=0).S100 had the lowest pooled positivity rate(38%)but exhibited high heterogeneity(I2=85.9%).Pairwise comparisons indicated that the positivity rate of ctDNA was significantly higher than those of LDH and S100,and LDH was significantly higher than S100.Heterogeneity for S100 was mainly attributed to differences in disease stage and country.Conclusions In monitoring disease progression in high-recurrence-risk melanoma,ctDNA may be prioritized as a serological marker with high sensitivity and stability to assist in evaluating tumor burden and treatment response.
程晓龙;唐健;姚刚
210029 江苏 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院 整形烧伤科210029 江苏 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院 整形烧伤科210029 江苏 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院 整形烧伤科
黑色素瘤血清生物标志物疾病进展Meta分析阳性率
MelanomaSerum BiomarkersDisease ProgressionMeta-AnalysisPositive Rate
《中国肿瘤外科杂志》 2026 (2)
213-218,226,7
评论