首页|期刊导航|中国美容医学|瑞马唑仑舒适化麻醉在口腔手术中的应用效果观察

瑞马唑仑舒适化麻醉在口腔手术中的应用效果观察OA

Observation on the Application Effect of Remimazolam Comfortable Anesthesia in Oral Surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探究瑞马唑仑舒适化麻醉在口腔手术中的应用效果.方法:选取2023年3月-2024年2月于河北中石油中心医院进行口腔手术的患者135例,采用随机双色球法将患者分为丙泊酚组(n=67)和瑞马唑仑组(n=68),经倾向性评分匹配后,共纳入96例患者,丙泊酚组和瑞马唑仑组均为48例.收集患者一般资料,于两组患者术后1 h、6 h、12 h及24h时评估患者疼痛及镇静程度,于两组患者术后6 h、12 h及24h时评估患者舒适程度;于两组患者术前及术后24 h,检测患者血清中疼痛介质[5-羟色胺(5-Hydroxytryptamine,5-HT)、β-内啡肽(β-endorphin,β-EP)、前列腺素E2(Prostaglandin E2,PGE2)]、应激因子[去甲肾上腺素(Norepinephrine,NE)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(Angiotensin Ⅱ,AngⅡ)、皮质醇(Cortisol,Cor)]水平.采用广义估计方程(Generalized Estimating Equation,GEE)评估不同麻醉方案对患者临床麻醉相关指标的影响程度,统计两组患者不良事件发生情况.结果:术后24h内,两组患者VAS评分均呈现先升高后降低的趋势,且瑞马唑仑组低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05);两组患者RSS评分均呈现降低趋势,且瑞马唑仑组低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05);两组患者BCS评分均呈现上升趋势,且瑞马唑仑组高于丙泊酚组(P<0.05);术前,两组患者疼痛介质、应激因子水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后24 h,两组患者5-HT、β-EP、PGE2、NE、AngⅡ、Cor水平均较术前明显升高,且丙泊酚组明显高于瑞马唑仑组(P<0.05).GEE方程结果显示,丙泊酚组和瑞马唑仑组5-HT、β-EP、PGE2、NE、AngⅡ、Cor水平在不同时间点的测量值差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),各组指标组间与时间的交互均具有统计学意义(P<0.05).瑞马唑仑组患者不良事件发生率明显低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05).结论:瑞马唑仑应用于口腔颌面外科手术全身麻醉中,可获得较好的术后镇痛及镇静效果,患者术后舒适度较高,且麻醉不良事件发生率较低,具有较好的临床应用安全性.

Objective Exploring the effects of remimazolam comfort anaesthesia in oral surgery.Methods 135 patients who underwent oral surgery in Hebei PetroChina Central Hospital from March 2023 to February 2024 were selected and divided into propofol group(n=67)and remimazolam group(n=68)using randomised two-colour balloon method,after propensity score matching,a total of 96 patients were included,48 in both the propofol and remimazolam groups.General data of patients were collected and the level of pain and sedation was assessed at 1 h,6 h,12 h and 24 h postoperatively and the level of comfort was assessed at 6 h,12 h and 24 h postoperatively in both groups;the serum levels of pain mediators[5-Hydroxytryptamine(5-HT),β-endorphin(β-EP),Prostaglandin E2(PGE2)],and stress factors[Norepinephrine(NE),Angiotensin Ⅱ(Ang Ⅱ),Cortisol(Cor)]were examined in the patients of the two groups preoperatively and at 24 h postoperatively.Generalised estimating equations(GEE)were used to assess the degree of influence of different anaesthetic regimens on patients'clinical anaesthesia-related indexes,and the occurrence of adverse events in the two groups was counted.Results The VAS scores of patients in both groups showed a tendency to first increase then decrease within 24 h postoperatively,and the remimazolam group was lower than the propofol group(P<0.05).The RSS scores showed a decreasing trend,and the remimazolam group was lower than the propofol group(P<0.05).The BCS scores showed an increasing trend,and the remimazolam group was higher than the propofol group(P<0.05).Preoperatively,there was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the levels of pain mediators and stress factors(P>0.05),at 24 h postoperatively,the levels of 5-HT,β-EP,PGE2,NE,Ang Ⅱ,and Cor were significantly higher in both groups compared with preoperative levels,and were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the remimazolam group(P<0.05).The results of the GEE equation showed that the differences in the measured values of 5-HT,β-EP,PGE2,NE,Ang Ⅱ,and Cor levels between the propofol and remimazolam groups at different time points were statistically significant(P<0.05),and the interactions between the groups of indicators with time were statistically significant(P<0.05).The rate of adverse events was significantly lower in patients in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of remimazolam in general anaesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgery can obtain better postoperative analgesia and sedation,with higher postoperative comfort for patients and lower incidence of anaesthetic adverse events,which has a better safety of clinical application.

麻婷婷;张富杰;郑亚丽;杨娜

河北中石油中心医院麻醉科 河北 廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院麻醉科 河北 廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院麻醉科 河北 廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院麻醉科 河北 廊坊 065000

医药卫生

瑞马唑仑舒适化麻醉口腔手术麻醉效果安全性

Remimazolamcomfort anaesthesiaoral surgeryanaesthesia effectsafety

《中国美容医学》 2026 (4)

66-71,6

廊坊市科技支撑计划项目(编号:2023013048)

评论