医院和社区获得性感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药及基因组比较OA
Comparison in antimicrobial resistance and genome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from healthcare-associated and community-associated infections
目的 分析上海浦东地区医院与社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的药敏表型、分子特征及遗传进化关系,以期为精准防控提供数据支持.方法 2024 年 6-12 月共收集 8 所医院 101 株 MRSA 菌株,分为医院获得性 MRSA(HA-MRSA)和社区获得性 MRSA(CA-MRSA),比较两组 MRSA 耐药率、耐药基因及毒力基因携带情况,同时进行多位点序列分型(MLST)及系统发育分析.结果 101 株 MRSA 中,CA-MRSA 63 株,HA-MRSA 38 株,主要标本类型均为痰液.HA-MRSA 对左氧氟沙星和四环素耐药率均高于 CA-MRSA(均 P<0.05),未检出对呋喃妥因、万古霉素、利福平耐药菌株.101 株 MRSA 共携带 13 类 45 种耐药基因,HA-MRSA 中mec I、mec R1、ant(4')-Ib、erm A、tet M 的携带率均高于 CA-MRSA(均 P<0.05),两组 MRSA 消毒剂抗性基因qac A 携带率均较高(分别为 26.32%、15.87%).101 株 MRSA 携带 sea、seb 等 4 种肠毒素基因;两组均以 seb 基因携带率最高;杀白细胞素 PVL 由 luk S-PV 和 luk F-PV 基因共同编码,HA-MRSA 中 luk F-PV 携带率高于 CA-MRSA(89.47%VS 65.08%,P<0.05).3 株 ST22 型 MRSA 同时携带 luk S-PV 和 luk F-PV 基因,且其中 1 株同时携带tsst-1 基因.101 株 MRSA 共检出 14 种 ST 型,以 ST764(53.47%)、ST398(13.86%)和 ST59(7.92%)为主,且膦酸类、莫匹罗星耐药基因及消毒剂抗性基因仅存在于 ST764 中.基于 SNP 的系统发育树显示,HA-MRSA 与 CA-MRSA 交错分布.结论 HA-MRSA 对多种抗菌药物耐药率、耐药及毒力基因携带率高于 CA-MRSA,耐药形势严峻,ST 型别丰富,需构建医院-社区一体化监测与干预网络,实施协同综合防控.
Objective To analyze antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes,molecular characteristics,and genetic evolution of healthcare-associated(HA)and community-associated(CA)methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)strains in Pudong area,Shanghai,and provide data support for precise prevention and control.Methods From June to December 2024,a total of 101 MRSA strains were collected from 8 hospitals and divided into HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA groups.Antimicrobial resistance rate,as well as resistance and virulence genes of two groups of MRSA were compared.Multilocus sequence typing(MLST)and phylogenetic analysis were per-formed.Results Among the 101 MRSA strains,63 were CA-MRSA and 38 were HA-MRSA,with sputum being the main specimen type.The resistance rates of HA-MRSA to levofloxacin and tetracycline were both higher than CA-MRSA(both P<0.05).No strains resistant to furantoin,vancomycin,and rifampicin were detected.101 MRSA strains carried 45 resistance genes of 13 classes,carrying rates of mec I,mec R1,ant(4')-Ib,erm A,and tet M in HA-MRSA were all higher than in CA-MRSA(all P<0.05).The carrying rates of the disinfectant-resistant gene qac A in two groups of MRSA were high(26.32%and 15.87%,respectively).101 MRSA strains carried 4 enterotoxin genes,including sea and seb;the highest carriage rate in both groups was that of seb gene;Panton-Valentine leukocidin(PVL)was co-encoded by the luk S-PV and luk F-PV genes,and the carrying rate of luk F-PV in HA-MRSA was higher than in CA-MRSA(89.47%vs 65.08%,P<0.05).Three ST22 MRSA strains carried both luk S-PV and luk F-PV genes,and one of them also carried tsst-1 gene.A total of 14 STs were detected from 101 MRSA strains,with ST764(53.47%),ST398(13.86%),and ST59(7.92%)being the main types.Antimicrobial resistance genes for phosphonic acid and mupirocin,as well as disinfectant-resistant genes only presented in ST764.Single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP)-based phylogenetic tree showed that HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA distributed alternately.Conclusion HA-MRSA possesses higher resistance rates and higher carriage rates of resistance and virulence genes than CA-MRSA,indicating a more severe resistance situation and abundant STs.It is necessary to establish a hospital-community integrated monitoring and intervention network and implement coordinated comprehensive prevention and control.
梁艳茹;张悦;何磊;徐依盈;赵冰;王筱
上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136上海市浦东新区疾病预防控制中心(上海市浦东新区卫生健康监督所)微生物检测实验室,上海 200136||复旦大学浦东预防医学研究院,上海 200136
医药卫生
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院感染社区感染基因组
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureushealthcare-associated infectioncommunity-associated infectiongenome
《中国感染控制杂志》 2026 (4)
489-498,10
上海市浦东新区卫生健康委员会青年科技项目(PWRq2025-03)
评论