救济空间与权力剧场:城市治理视域下的民国青岛慈善义演OA

The state-society coordination mechanism that emerged during the transformation of social governance serves as the institutional foundation for constructing a political community.This mechanism necessitates that governance entities be equipped with both the ability for institutionalized political participation and the efficacy of cultur-al capital transmission.The introduction of modern Western relief ideologies and approa-ches has propelled the transformation of traditional Chinese relief methods towards mul-tifunctional models.During the Republic of China era,Qingdao integrated traditional folk-custom spaces and modern urban functions to establish a new platform for public-welfare activities,thereby achieving the interactive integration of the culture of benefit performances and charitable relief efforts.After regaining sovereignty,the local govern-ment utilized"theater politics"to establish a municipal mobilization system.The tem-porary disaster-relief agencies under its auspices incorporated traditional communities such as chambers of commerce and native-place associations,along with emerging pub-lic-welfare organizations,into a collaborative network.Administrative forces enhanced their power image in public performances.While using disaster-relief benefit perform-ances to legitimize urban management,they also implemented social regulation through tax-levy and tax-exemption policies.In this context,charitable activities integrating multiple elements have gradually evolved into institutionalized governance tools,giving rise to a governance model characterized by administrative leadership and multi-party collaborative participation.However,the urban governance dilemmas following the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression have laid bare the limitations of the sys-tem.The government's practice of regarding the performing arts industry as a means of fiscal extraction has exacerbated the dual governance failures of weakened public-welfare attributes and resource centralization.