首页|期刊导航|重庆高教研究|大学治理体系的类型划分与检验:国家权力的视角

大学治理体系的类型划分与检验:国家权力的视角OACHSSCD

Typology and Examination of University Governance Systems:A Perspective of State Power

中文摘要英文摘要

大学治理现代化包括大学治理体系和大学治理能力的同步现代化,前者是后者产生的组织依托和制度基础.大学治理体系及其类型受到国家权力作用于大学的方式以及大学组织结构和规模的交互影响.国家权力对大学的办学引导与支配方式可分为基础权力和专断权力两种,我国现代大学的发展经历了从组织结构单一到复杂的变化,构成社团自治型、行政控制型、委托管理型和协商治理型4种治理类型.协商治理型大学治理是国家以基础权力形式和制度化渠道,将高等教育发展目标及意图渗透和传递给大学,并作为协商主体的一方参与大学治理,形成国家与大学的观念共识、文化认同和促进大学学术发展的行动支持与配合策略,进而有效实现国家目标和强化政策权威.对中国大学治理变迁历史的梳理与检验表明,协商治理型大学治理体系符合我国大学治理变革的发展趋向,是推进大学治理现代化的理想类型.

The modernization of university governance encompasses the simultaneous modernization of both the university governance system and the university governance capacity.The university governance system serves as the organizational framework and institutional foundation for generating university governance capacity.The governance system and typology of universities are shaped by the way state power acts on universities,as well as the interaction between university organizational structure and scale.State power over universities can be categorized into two forms:infrastructural power and despotic power.The development of modern universities in China has evolved from simple,homogeneous organizational structures to complex ones,giving rise to four distinct governance models:community autonomy,administrative control,entrusted management,and consultative governance.Consultative governance in universities refers to the infiltration and transmission of higher education development goals and intentions to universities by the state in the form of the infrastructural power and institutionalized channels.The state,as one of the consultative subject,participates in university governance,forming a conceptual consensus,cultural identity,and action support and cooperation strategies of promote academic development,thereby effectively achieving national goals and strengthening policy authority.A review and examination of the historical evolution of university governance in China indicates that the consultative governance model aligns with the direction of governance reforms in Chinese universities and represents an ideal type for advancing the modernization of university governance.

王务均;李如愿

安徽工业大学 公共管理与法学院,马鞍山 243002安徽工业大学 公共管理与法学院,马鞍山 243002

社会科学

大学治理体系现代化国家权力协商治理理想类型学术文化网络

modernization of university governance systemstate powerconsultative governanceideal typeacademic cultural network

《重庆高教研究》 2026 (3)

18-27,10

安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目"知识市场驱动地方大学校院管理创新研究"(AHSKY2023D041)

10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.03.003

评论