首页|期刊导航|湖北科技学院学报(医学版)|无创通气联合高流量鼻导管氧疗对急性呼吸衰竭患者的影响

无创通气联合高流量鼻导管氧疗对急性呼吸衰竭患者的影响OA

The Effects of Non-Invasive Ventilation Combined with High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨对急性呼吸衰竭患者行无创通气联合高流量鼻导管氧疗对其呼吸功能、氧合功能的影响.方法 选取本院收治的77例急性呼吸衰竭患者,以随机数字表法分组,无创组38例予以无创呼吸机辅助通气治疗,高流量氧疗组39例采用无创呼吸辅助通气及高流量氧疗治疗,两组均观察至出院,并随访28d,统计对比各项指标.结果 治疗后,高流量氧疗组ICU 入住时间、发绀及气短消失时间均短于无创组;两组Borg呼吸困难评分均降低、OI均升高,且高流量氧疗组改善更显著;两组SpO2、PaO2均升高、PaCO2均下降,高流量氧疗组血气指标更优;两组CRP、IL-6及WBC均降低,高流量氧疗组更低;高流量氧疗组28d内存活且无需机械通气天数长于无创组(P均<0.05).高流量氧疗组28d病死率低于无创组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 对急性呼吸衰竭患者采用无创通气联合高流量鼻导管氧疗,能更有效缩短治疗相关时间、改善呼吸功能与氧合功能、降低炎症反应及延长28d内无需机械通气的存活时间,整体疗效优于单纯无创通气.

Objective To investigate the effects of non-invasive ventilation(NIV)combined with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy(HFNC)on respiratory and oxygenation functions of patients with acute respiratory failure.Methods A total of 77 patients with a-cute respiratory failure admitted to our hospital were selected and assigned to groups using a random number table.The NIV group(38 pa-tients)received ventilatory support via a non-invasive ventilator,while the HFNC group(39 patients)received a combination of non-inva-sive ventilatory support and HFNC therapy.Both groups were monitored until discharge and followed up for 28 days,during which various clinical indicators were statistically compared.Results Following treatment,the HFNC group demonstrated shorter ICU lengths of stay,as well as shorter durations for the resolution of cyanosis and shortness of breath,compared to the NIV group.In both groups,Borg dyspnea scores decreased and Oxygenation Indices(OI)increased,with the improvements being more significant in the HFNC group.Both groups exhibited increases in SpO2 and PaO2,along with decreases in PaCO2;notably,the HFNC group demonstrated superior blood gas parameters.Further-more,levels of CRP,IL-6,and WBC decreased in both groups,with the HFNC group achieving lower levels.The HFNC group also recorded a greater number of days of survival free from mechanical ventilation within the 28-day follow-up period compared to the NIV group(all P<0.05).Although the 28-day mortality rate in the HFNC group was lower than that in the NIV group,the difference was not statistically signif-icant(P>0.05).Conclusion In patients with acute respiratory failure,the combination of NIV and HFNC is more effective in reducing treatment-related duration,improving respiratory and oxygenation functions,attenuating inflammatory responses,and extending the duration of survival free from mechanical ventilation within 28 days;its overall therapeutic efficacy is superior to that of NIV alone.

罗森

崇阳县人民医院,湖北崇阳 437500

医药卫生

急性呼吸衰竭无创通气高流量鼻导管氧疗呼吸功能氧合功能

Acute respiratory failureNon-invasive ventilationHigh-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapyRespiratory functionOxy-genation function

《湖北科技学院学报(医学版)》 2026 (2)

141-144,148,5

10.16751/j.cnki.2095-4646.2025081801

评论