首页|期刊导航|西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)|苏格拉底节制思想的双重面向

苏格拉底节制思想的双重面向OACHSSCD

The Dual Dimensions of Socrates'Concept of Temperance:Based on the Analysis of Memorabilia and Charmides

中文摘要英文摘要

苏格拉底的"节制"思想是古希腊伦理体系中的重要概念,色诺芬的《回忆苏格拉底》与柏拉图的《卡尔米德篇》分别对其进行了论证.《回忆苏格拉底》关注节制在生活世界中的应用,以苏格拉底的言传身教凸显节制的实践导向及对个体行为的指引力,节制不仅涵养于个人德性的锤炼中,也内化于理想城邦的构建中.相反,《卡尔米德篇》则从更深邃的哲学角度探讨节制,将其置于形而上学框架内,塑造了苏格拉底道德伦理的人本主义哲学范式.这两种诠释路径虽取向各异,或强调现实践履的具体规范,或侧重形上本体的思辨推演,但却共同确证了节制的双重伦理价值——节制既是培育理性生活方式的实践准则,更是构筑幸福本体的德性根基.

Socrates'concept of"temperance"(sōphrosynē)constitutes a pivotal element in ancient Greek ethical thought.Xenophon's Memorabilia and Plato's Charmides offer distinct hermeneutical frameworks for its interpretation.The Memorabilia emphasizes temperance as applied wisdom within quotidian existence,portraying Socratic teachings through paradigmatic words and deeds that illuminate its practical orientation and normative guidance for individual conduct.Here,temperance manifests not merely as personal virtue cultivation but also as an immanent principle in constructing the ideal polis.In contrast,the Charmides engages in deeper metaphysical inquiry,situating temperance within an ontological framework that crystallizes Socratic ethics into a humanistic philosophical paradigm.While diverging in methodological emphasis the former prioritizing concrete behavioral norms,the latter emphasizing speculative ontology both texts collectively affirm temperance's dual ethical significance:as a practical maxim for cultivating rational lifestyles,and more profoundly,as the aretaic foundation for the ontology of eudaimonia.

崔佳旭

四川大学马克思主义学院

苏格拉底节制《回忆苏格拉底》《卡尔米德篇》

SocratestemperanceMemorabiliaCharmides

《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (2)

124-140,17

四川大学马克思主义学院学习贯彻党的二十届三中全会精神学生专项研究课题重点项目"中华传统美德传承体系构建及其现代转型研究"(CDMYXSZX02)

评论