首页|期刊导航|现代妇产科进展|超声引导下PNB联合PCIA在盆底手术术后镇痛中的应用价值

超声引导下PNB联合PCIA在盆底手术术后镇痛中的应用价值OA

Analysis of the application value of ultrasound-guided PNB combined with PCIA in post-operative analgesia for pelvic floor surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨超声引导下阴部神经阻滞(PNB)联合自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)在盆底手术术后镇痛中的应用价值.方法:选取2024 年5 月至2025 年4 月于郑州市中心医院妇科行全麻下经阴道或腹部重建手术的盆底器官脱垂患者120 例.按手术方式分为经阴道手术亚组和经腹部手术亚组,同时将患者随机分为3 组:A 组(PICA,40 例)、B 组(超声引导下 PNB,40 例)、C 组(PNB 联合 PCIA,40 例).采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后不同时间点疼痛程度,记录术后首次下床时间、首次尿管成功拔除时间、48h 内镇痛满意度、PCIA 药物累计用量,以及恶心呕吐、心动过缓等不良反应和阴部神经阻滞相关并发症发生率.结果:镇痛效果方面:两亚组中 C 组各时间点镇痛效果均最优,在术后早期(2、6h 及12h),A 组和 B 组镇痛效果无显著差异;在术后24、48h,A 组镇痛效果优于 B 组(经 Bonferroni 校正,P<0.0167).术后恢复方面:C 组首次下床时间和首次成功拔除尿管时间均显著早于 A 组和 B 组(P<0.0167),A 组与 B 组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.0167).药物用量方面:两亚组中 C 组 48h 内 PCIA 药物累计用量显著少于 A 组(P<0.05).镇痛满意度方面:两亚组 C 组患者的镇痛满意度均显著优于 A 组与 B 组(P<0.0167),A 组与 B 组之间未见明显统计学差异(P>0.0167).安全性方面:三组总体不良反应发生率较低;恶心呕吐发生率 A 组显著高于 B、C 组(P<0.0167),B、C 组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.0167);头晕、心动过缓及严重并发症(呼吸抑制、神经阻滞相关并发症)发生率,三组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:超声引导下 PNB 联合 PCIA 可明显缓解经阴道及经腹盆底重建术后疼痛,缩短术后恢复时间,减少阿片类药物用量及恶心呕吐风险,提高患者舒适度和镇痛满意度,具有良好临床应用前景.

Objective:To explore the application value of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block(PNB)combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)in the post-operative period of pelvic floor surgery.Methods:A total of 120 female patients who underwent transvaginal or abdominal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse under general anes-thesia in the Department of Gynecology,Zhengzhou Central Hospital from May 2024 to April 2025 were enrolled.The patients were divided into a transvaginal surgery subgroup and anab-dominal surgery subgroup according to surgical approach,and were randomly assigned to three groups using a random number table:Group A(n=40)received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA);Group B(n=40)underwent ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block(PNB);Group C(n=40)received PNB combined with PCIA.Painscores at different time points after surgery were recorded using the visual analogue scale(VAS).The time to first am-bulation and the time to first successful removal of the urinary catheter were documented.In ad-dition,analgesia satisfaction within 48 hours,cumulative consumption of PCIA drugs,incidence rates of adverse reactions such as nausea,vomiting and bradycardia,as well as the incidence of complications related to pudendal nerve block were recorded.Results:Analgesic effect:in both subgroups,Group C showed superior analgesic effect throughout the observation period.There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B at the early postoperative time points(2h,6h,and 12h after surgery).At the late postoperative time points(24h and 48h after surgery),the analgesic effect of Group A was better than that of Group B(after Bonferroni cor-rection,the significance level was set at P<0.0167).Postoperative recovery:the time to first ambulation and the time to first successful removal of the urinary catheter in Group C were sig-nificantly earlier than those in Group A and Group B(P<0.0167),with no significant differ-ence between Group A and Group B(P>0.0167).Drug consumption:in both subgroups,the cumulative consumption of PCIA drugs within 48h in Group C was significantly lower than that in Group A(P<0.05).Analgesia satisfaction:patient satisfaction with analgesia in Group C was significantly better than that in Group A and Group B in both subgroups(P<0.0167),with no significant difference between Group A and Group B(P>0.0167).Safety:the overall inci-dence of adverse reactions was low in all three groups.The incidence of nausea and vomiting in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B and Group C in both subgroups(P<0.0167),with no significant difference between Group B and Group C(P>0.0167).There were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence of dizziness,bradycardi-a,or severe complications(respiratory depression,nerve block-related complications)(P>0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasound-guided PNB combined with PCIA can significantly relieve post-operative pain in patients undergoing transvaginal and transabdominal pelvic floor reconstruc-tion,shorten the time to first ambulation and catheter removal,effectively reduce opioid con-sumption and the risk of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting,and improve patient comfort and subjective analgesic experience,showing a promising clinical application prospect.

黎素珍;申耀歌;栗浩然;相元翠;马金平;王朋飞;李红娟

河南医药大学,新乡 453003||郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007河南医药大学,新乡 453003||郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007郑州大学附属郑州中心医院,郑州 450007

医药卫生

盆底重建手术阴部神经阻滞术后镇痛自控静脉镇痛

Pelvic floor reconstructionsurgeryPudendal nerve blockPostoperative analgesiaControlled intravenous analgesia

《现代妇产科进展》 2026 (4)

255-259,266,6

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(No:LHGJ20230783)

10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2026.04.003

评论