首页|期刊导航|天然气勘探与开发|四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组岩相、岩相组合及其与油气的关系

四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组岩相、岩相组合及其与油气的关系OA

Lithofacies,lithofacies associations and their relationships with hydrocarbons in Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation,Sichuan Basin

中文摘要英文摘要

为了明确四川盆地侏罗系下统凉高山组岩相类型、烃源条件及储集性能,揭示优势岩相组合,基于野外露头剖面、钻井岩心等资料,通过岩石学、地球化学、储层物性等分析,开展了岩相、岩相组合及其与生烃、储集关系的综合评价研究.研究结果表明:①该盆地凉高山组发育砂岩相(A型)、粉砂岩相(B型)、块状页岩相(C型)、纹层状页岩相(D型)、砂泥(薄)互层相(E型)及泥岩相(F型)等6种岩相类型.②基于上述岩相分类,将岩相组合划分为砂岩相—块状页岩相组合(Ⅰ型)、砂岩相—泥岩相组合(Ⅱ型)、砂岩相—粉砂岩相组合(Ⅲ型)、砂泥(薄)互层相—纹层状页岩相组合(Ⅳ型)和纹层状页岩相—块状页岩相组合(Ⅴ型)等5类.③凉高山组页岩的总有机碳含量(TOC)平均值为1.55%,生烃潜量(S1+S2)平均值为2.21 mg/g,其中C型与D型的烃源条件较好,E型的烃源条件相对较差.④不同岩相的储集性能差异明显,A型、B型、C型、D型、E型的平均孔隙度分别为5.30%、1.44%、3.42%、3.24%、2.22%,可见A型的孔隙度显著高于其他岩相,C型与D型次之,再次是E型,而B型的孔隙度最低.⑤对岩相组合的综合分析认为,砂岩相—块状页岩相组合(Ⅰ型)的烃源条件和储集条件最好,为最优岩相组合;同时,砂泥(薄)互层相—纹层状页岩相组合(Ⅳ型)与纹层状页岩相—块状页岩相组合(Ⅴ型)均为较优的岩相组合.结论认为,四川盆地凉高山组具备良好的页岩油气勘探开发潜力,优势岩相组合的明确可为该区页岩油气勘探开发提供理论依据.

In order to clarify the lithofacies types,source rock conditions,and reservoir properties,identify the dominant lithofacies associations of the Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in the Sichuan Basin,a comprehensive evaluation was conducted on lithofacies,lithofacies associations and their relationships with hydrocarbon generation and accumulation,through analyses of petrology,geochemistry and reservoir physical properties using field outcrop sections and drilling core data.The following results are obtained.(i)There develops six lithofacies types in the Lianggaoshan Formation of this basin:sandstone(Type A),siltstone(Type B),massive shale(Type C),laminated shale(Type D),(thin)interbedded sandstone-mudstone(Type E),and mudstone(Type F).(ii)On the basis of lithofacies classification above,five types of lithofacies associations are identified as:sandstone+massive shale(TypeⅠ),sandstone+mudstone(TypeⅡ),sandstone+siltstone(TypeⅢ),(thin)interbedded sandstone-mudstone+laminated shale(TypeⅣ),and laminated shale+massive shale(TypeⅤ).(iii)The Lianggaoshan Formation shales exhibit the average total organic carbon(TOC)of 1.55%and the average hydrocarbon generation potential(S1+S2)of 2.21 mg/g.Specifically,Types C and D reflect good source rock conditions,while Type E shows relatively poor ones.(iv)Lithofacies types vary significantly in reservoir properties,with the average porosities of 5.30%,1.44%,3.42%,3.24%,and 2.22%for Types A,B,C,D,and E,respectively.It is evident that Types A exhibits notably higher porosity than the other lithofacies,followed by Types C and D,then Type E,while Type B shows the lowest porosity.(v)Comprehensive analysis on lithofacies associations demonstrates that TypeⅠ has the best source rock and reservoir conditions,indicating the optimal association.Meanwhile,TypesⅣ andⅤ are both favorable ones.It is concluded that the Lianggaoshan Formation in the Sichuan Basin has a promising potential,and the clarification of dominant lithofacies associations provides a theoretical support for shale oil and gas exploration and development.

王兴志;吕豪;白利;张少敏;王跃祥;何绪全;郭奕浩;曾德铭;康家豪

西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院 四川 成都 610041中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院 四川 成都 610041中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院 四川 成都 610041中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院 四川 成都 610041西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500

天文与地球科学

岩相岩相组合储集特征侏罗系下统凉高山组四川盆地页岩油气

LithofaciesLithofacies associationReservoir propertyLower Jurassic Lianggaoshan FormationSichuan BasinShale oil and gas

《天然气勘探与开发》 2026 (2)

141-155,15

中国石油—西南石油大学创新联合体科研项目"四川盆地侏罗系湖相页岩油地质理论技术研究与有利区评价"(编号:2020CX050000).

10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2026.02.009

评论