国际体育联合会事实性权力的产生与规制OACHSSCD
Generation and Regulation of De Facto Power in International Sports Federations
国际体育联合会的事实性权力是指未经法律明确授权,却在全球体育实践中被普遍接受的监管权力.本研究运用文献资料法与案例分析法,系统剖析事实性权力的形成原因、表现形态、法律性质.研究发现,事实性权力的生成根植于国际体育联合会在体育领域的垄断地位与国际体育治理的金字塔式结构;事实性权力的基本形态可归纳为准立法权、准行政权和准司法权;事实性权力在法律性质上兼具社会公权力的外部效应与异化权力的内在风险.法理反思表明,国际体育联合会的事实性权力在运行中可能与社会契约论的基本精神相背离,并对运动员的诸多人权构成现实侵犯.为在法律框架下有效规制该权力,本研究提出两点建议:一是组建运动员常设代表机构,推行集体谈判,引入公司治理原则以弥补治理结构中的民主缺陷;二是明确并强化国际体育联合会总部所在国家的首要监管职责和救济责任,拓宽运动员向多主体主张权利的司法救济途径,确立尊重自治、必要介入、实质审查的司法干预原则与审查标准以保障人权.
The de facto power of International Sports Federations refers to the regulatory power accepted in global sports practice without explicit legal authorization.By the methods of literature review and case analysis,this paper systematically examines the origins,manifestations,and legal nature of this power.It shows that the power is rooted in the monopoly of International Sports Federations and the pyramid structure of international sports governance;the basic forms of de facto power can be summarized as quasi-legislative power,quasi-administrative power and quasi-judicial power;Legally,de facto power has the external effect of social public power and the internal risk of alienated power.Jurisprudential reflection reveals that the de facto power of International Sports Federations may deviate from the basic spirit of social contract theory in operation,and it may infringe many human rights of athletes.To effectively regulate this power within a legal framework,two suggestions are proposed:first,establishing a permanent representative body for athletes,promoting collective bargaining,and introducing the principle of corporate governance to make up for the democratic deficiencies in the governance structure;second,clarifying and strengthening the primary regulatory and remedy responsibilities of the countries where the headquarters of International Sports Federations are located,expanding the judicial remedy channels for athletes to claim rights from multiple subjects,and establishing the judicial intervention principles and review standards of respecting autonomy,necessary involvement,and substantive review to safeguard human rights.
郭树理;严佳馨
苏州大学 王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006苏州大学 王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006
社会科学
事实性权力国际体育国际体育联合会人权保护司法审查
de facto powerinternational sportsInternational Sports Federationshuman rights protectionjudicial review
《沈阳体育学院学报》 2026 (2)
71-77,7
国家社会科学基金一般项目"各国反兴奋剂立法之体系模式与制度构造比较研究"(23BTY036).
评论