"自甘风险"规则下青少年校园足球伤害案件归责研究OACHSSCD
Liability Determination of Youth Campus Football Injury Cases Under the"Assumption of Risk"Rule
足球运动在伤害风险性上具有典型性.青少年作为校园足球运动的参与者,是危险的潜在制造者与承担者.因青少年校园足球伤害案件涉及的受害方主体往往是作为限制民事行为能力人的中小学生,并且在限制民事行为能力人造成他人损害的情形下还涉及监护人承担侵权责任的问题,故应结合当下的司法实践案例,在"自甘风险"规则下对青少年校园足球伤害案件的责任划分与承担进行明晰.通过对中国裁判文书网222篇裁判文书的案例分析与解构,本研究认为应以对"运动规则"的违反程度作为行为人是否存在故意或重大过失的判断基准.同时,学校不能依据"自甘风险"规则而豁免责任,而需在充分考虑未成年人身心特点的前提下,采取客观的判断标准考量校方是否已经尽到相关教育管理职责.校方可通过为学生配置运动意外伤害等专项保险,促进风险的社会化分担.
Football is a typical sport in terms of injury risk.As participants in campus football,adolescents are both potential creators and bearers of risk.Given that the injured parties in youth campus football injury cases are usually primary and secondary school students with limited civil capacity,and that the issue of guardians'tort liability arises when minors with limited civil capacity cause harm to others,it is necessary to clarify the determination in such cases under the"assumption of risk"rule by drawing on current judicial practice.Through the analysis of 222 judicial documents from China Judgments Online,this study holds that the degree of violation of the"game rules"should serve as the benchmark for determining whether the actor acted with intent or gross negligence.At the same time,schools cannot be exempted from liability under the"assumption of risk"rule.Instead they should adopt an objective judgment standard to determine whether they have fulfilled their educational and management responsibilities,while fully considering the physical and mental characteristics of minors.Schools can promote socialized risk sharing by providing students with specilaized insurance for sports-related accidental injuries.
虞沁宸
华东师范大学 体育与健康学院,上海 200241||华东师范大学 青少年健康评价与运动干预教育部重点实验室,上海 200241
社会科学
校园足球足球伤害自甘风险侵权责任承担安全保障义务
campus footballfootball injuryassumption of risktort liability assumptionsafety control duty
《沈阳体育学院学报》 2026 (2)
43-49,7
上海市教育委员会本级财政项目"2025年立德树人人文社科基地建设(体育)"(11001-412224-25A19).
评论