首页|期刊导航|实验技术与管理|井字形钢箱梁结构关键焊缝部位裂纹扩展实验研究

井字形钢箱梁结构关键焊缝部位裂纹扩展实验研究OA

Experimental study on crack propagation in critical weld joints of grid-shaped steel box girder structures

中文摘要英文摘要

井字形钢箱梁结构是某工程地面承载系统的核心承载部件.实际检修维护中,在结构承载核心区不同焊缝部位发现了裂纹.由于承载核心区为双向井字梁,结构受力复杂,无法评估裂纹在高密度服役工况下的扩展情况.为此,设计了 1∶10 的缩比结构,在承载核心区不同焊缝部位预制了 6处人工缺陷,并通过逐级增大载荷方式开展疲劳加载,获得了 4 条初始裂纹;而后开展了带裂纹缩比结构在等效服役载荷作用下的裂纹扩展实验.实验结果表明:①受拉区预制缺陷全部产生了疲劳裂纹,受压区则无裂纹产生;②所有裂纹的扩展方向基本与梁长(拉应力)方向垂直,判断裂纹类型主要为张开型(I型);③所有扩展裂纹的a-N曲线呈现相对稳定的线性特征,其中最大扩展速率为0.945 mm/103 N.研究提出并验证了在结构实验中采用人工预制缺陷+逐级增大疲劳荷载获得初始裂纹的可行性,实验结果探明了等效服役荷载下关键焊缝部位带裂纹结构的扩展规律,为优化结构检修维护方案提供了依据.

[Objective]A grid-shaped steel box girder structure serves as the core load-bearing component of ground support systems in a specific engineering project.It bears static support,fuel filling,and gas flow impact loads during service.Owing to the extensive number of structural welds and their concealed locations,weld cracks are inevitable during manufacturing,assembly,and usage.During actual inspection and maintenance,cracks are detected in various weld locations within the structural load-bearing core area.This core area comprises a two-way grid pattern of girders with complex stress conditions,making it difficult to assess crack propagation under high-intensity service conditions.Existing studies primarily employ an analytic hierarchy process or a finite element method to analyze the impact of cracks on structural reliability and service life.However,these studies did not investigate the propagation behavior of cracks under repeated operational loads,and their findings were not sufficiently validated by experimental data.[Methods]To assess the crack propagation behavior at critical weld joints under high-intensity service demands and ensure structural service safety,an experimental research approach was adopted.A 1:10 scaled-down model of a load-bearing core structure was designed based on similitude relationships.Six artificial defects were prefabricated at different weld locations within the load-bearing core area by introducing artificially created flaws,with two and four located in the compression and tension zones,respectively.Then,fatigue loading was applied by progressively increasing the load magnitude,resulting in the initiation of four initial cracks.Subsequently,crack propagation tests were conducted on the scaled-down model with these cracks under equivalent service loads.[Results]Test results indicate the following.(1)When the fatigue peak load was increased to three times the equivalent service load,fatigue cracks initiated from all prefabricated defects in the tension zone,whereas no cracks were observed in the compression zone throughout the process.(2)With twice the equivalent service fatigue loading,the cracks in base and vertical plates at support points#2 and#4 of the scaled-down model exhibited similar evolution characteristics.The crack growth rates in the lower sections of the vertical plates were consistently higher than those in the base plates,which aligns with the strain patterns measured during the prefabricated crack tests.(3)The propagation direction of all cracks was essentially perpendicular to the beam's longitudinal direction(i.e.,the tensile stress direction),indicating that the cracks were primarily in the opening mode.(4)The a-N curves of all propagating cracks demonstrated relatively stable linear characteristics,with the maximum growth rate recorded at 0.945 mm/103 cycles.[Conclusions]We proposed and validated the feasibility of using artificially prefabricated defects combined with stepwise increased fatigue loading to generate initial cracks in structural testing.The test results elucidated the propagation behavior of cracked structures at critical weld locations under equivalent service loads.This provides an experimental data reference for technicians to assess the service condition of the load-bearing core structure and forms a basis for optimizing structural inspection and maintenance strategies.

谢永兰;连青林;金莹;刘宝龙;宋术伟;王华吉;闫松涛;程明龙

北京科技大学 国家材料服役安全科学中心,北京 100083北京航天发射技术研究所,北京 100076北京科技大学 国家材料服役安全科学中心,北京 100083北京航天发射技术研究所,北京 100076北京科技大学 国家材料服役安全科学中心,北京 100083北京航天发射技术研究所,北京 100076北京科技大学 国家材料服役安全科学中心,北京 100083北京航天发射技术研究所,北京 100076

航空航天

钢箱梁结构焊缝裂纹裂纹扩展扩展速率a-N曲线

box girder structureweld crackcrack propagationpropagation ratea-N curve

《实验技术与管理》 2026 (3)

91-97,7

10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.012

评论