首页|期刊导航|山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)|城乡废弃物堆肥对黄瓜生长与连作土壤的改良效应

城乡废弃物堆肥对黄瓜生长与连作土壤的改良效应OA

Amelioration effects of urban and rural organic waste compost on cucumber growth and continuous cropping soil

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]在设施蔬菜连作背景下,系统评估不同来源城乡有机废弃物堆肥对连作土壤质量和黄瓜生长的影响差异,阐明其改良效应特征,可为农业废弃物资源化利用和连作土壤管理提供依据.[方法]以四川典型黄瓜连作温室土壤为研究对象,设置不施肥(CK)、化肥(CF)、餐厨堆肥(KC)、猪粪堆肥(PC)、水葫芦堆肥(WF)和水稻秸秆堆肥(RC)6个处理,2024年8月-11月于温室中开展试验,测定黄瓜产量与果实品质以及土壤理化性质、酶活性、微生物数量和植物毒性指标;并基于同批土壤开展为期10 d的幼苗盆栽试验,以验证不同堆肥处理的后效表现.[结果]与CK相比,5个堆肥处理下黄瓜产量增加8.83%~16.19%,游离氨基酸、可溶性蛋白、可溶性糖及维生素C含量均高于CK;土壤容重下降8.84%~14.97%,总孔隙度提高11.01%~18.65%,pH提升而EC降低,碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾和有机质含量均显著提升.其中,PC在提升碱解氮和有效磷含量方面效果最为突出,WF在提高速效钾和有机质含量方面优势明显.不同堆肥处理使土壤多种酶活性提高20.09%~69.91%,有益微生物数量增加,尖孢镰刀菌受到抑制,种子发芽指数提高44.27%~68.69%.盆栽试验结果表明,堆肥改良后的连作土壤可持续促进黄瓜幼苗生长,株高、叶面积、SPAD及干重均增加29.27%~260.00%.[结论]城乡有机废弃物堆肥通过改善土壤结构、提升养分供应能力、增强酶活性并调节微生物数量结构,协同缓解设施黄瓜连作土壤障碍.不同堆肥在改良方向上存在差异,猪粪堆肥以养分供给和微生物响应见长,水葫芦堆肥在钾素补充和土壤结构改善方面优势突出,餐厨堆肥对土壤酶活性和叶片生理指标促进作用较为明显,秸秆堆肥养分释放相对缓慢但具有持续改良潜力.

[Objectives]Under the background of facility vegetable continuous cropping,this study systematically evaluated the differential effects of composts derived from various urban and rural organic wastes on continuous cropping soil quality and cu-cumber growth,aiming to clarify their amelioration characteristics and provide a scientific basis for agricultural waste resource utilization and continuous cropping soil management.[Methods]Taking a typical greenhouse soil under continuous cucumber cropping in Sichuan as the research object,a field experiment was conducted from August to November 2024.Six treatments were established,including no fertilizer(CK),chemical fertilizer(CF),kitchen waste compost(KC),pig manure compost(PC),water hyacinth compost(WF),and rice straw compost(RC).Cucumber yield and fruit quality,as well as soil physico-chemical properties,enzyme activities,microbial quantity,and phytotoxicity indicators were determined.In addition,a 10-day seedling pot experiment based on the same batch of soils was carried out to verify the residual effect performance of different compost treatments.[Results]Compared with CK,the five compost treatments increased cucumber yield by 8.83%~16.19%,and the contents of free amino acids,soluble protein,soluble sugars,and vitamin C were all higher than those in CK.Soil bulk density decreased by 8.84%~14.97%,while total porosity increased by 11.01%~18.65%;Soil pH increased while electrical conductivity(EC)decreased.Soil alkali-hydrolyzable N,available P,available K,and organic matter contents were significantly improved.Among the composts,PC was most prominent in increasing alkali-hydrolyzable N and available P,whereas WF exhibited clear advantages in improving available K and organic matter.Different compost treatments en-hanced multiple soil enzyme activities by 20.09%~69.91%,increased the quantity of beneficial microorganisms,suppressed Fusarium oxysporum,and raised the seed germination index by 44.27%~68.69%.The pot experiment results showed that the continuous cropping soil improved by compost sustainably promoted the growth of cucumber seedlings,with plant height,leaf area,SPAD,and dry weight increasing by 29.27%~260.00%.[Conclusion]Urban and rural organic waste composts syn-ergistically alleviated facility cucumber continuous cropping soil obstacles by improving soil structure,enhancing nutrient supply capacity,strengthening enzyme activities,and regulating microbial quantity and structure.There were differences in the im-provement direction of different composts:pig manure compost excelled in nutrient supply and microbial response;Water hya-cinth compost showed outstanding advantages in potassium supplementation and soil structural improvement;Kitchen waste compost had a more obvious promotion effects on soil enzyme activity and leaf physiological indicators;while rice straw com-post released nutrients relatively slowly but had potential for continuous improvement.

程前昌;杨鸿;刘青旂;刘铮

内江师范学院 地理与测绘科学学院,四川 内江,641100四川农业大学 环境学院,四川 成都,611130沈阳农业大学 土地与环境学院,辽宁 沈阳,110866辽宁省农业科学院 农村经济研究所,辽宁 沈阳,110161

农业科技

有机废弃物堆肥连作障碍土壤改良酶活性

Organic wasteCompostContinuous cropping obstacleSoil improvementEnzyme activity

《山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (2)

149-160,12

国家自然科学基金(32071552)

10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202511033

评论