首页|期刊导航|护理研究|基于CiteSpace的养老服务人才培养可视化分析

基于CiteSpace的养老服务人才培养可视化分析OA

Visual analysis of research on elderly care service personnel training based on CiteSpace

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:基于文献计量学方法系统梳理中英文文献养老服务人才培养领域的研究现状、热点前沿与发展趋势,为我国养老服务人才培养体系的本土化构建与高质量发展提供理论支撑和实践参考.方法:以Web of Science核心合集和中国知网(CNKI)为数据来源,检索1999年1月1日—2025年5月26日发表的相关文献,通过CiteSpace 6.4.R1软件对1 147篇有效文献(英文394篇、中文753篇)进行可视化分析,包括发文量时序特征、作者及机构合作网络分析,以及关键词共现、聚类(Q值均>0.3,S值均>0.7)、时间线动态演变与关键词突现的对比研究.结果:中文文献发文量近10年呈显著增长趋势(2024年达90篇),英文文献发文量自2007年后趋于平稳(2021年达38篇).研究存在3个方面核心问题:研究主体集中于护理学专业,对临床医学、康复治疗学等多学科人才关注不足;作者及机构合作网络松散,医教协同模式尚未形成;研究区域差异显著,发达国家及中文文献一线城市研究活跃度更高.热点对比显示,中文文献聚焦医养结合、产教融合、智慧养老及政策驱动下的人才队伍建设,英文文献侧重长期护理、临终关怀、预先护理计划及服务质量评估.结论:养老服务人才培养是应对人口老龄化的关键环节,本研究揭示的研究差异与前沿趋势可为我国构建多学科协同、医教融合的本土化养老人才培养体系提供重要参考,助力养老服务高质量发展.

Objective:To systematically review the research status,hotspots,frontiers,and development trends in the field of elderly care service personnel training both based on bibliometric methods,providing theoretical support and practical references for the localized construction and high-quality development of China's elderly care service personnel training system.Methods:Using the Web of Science core collection and CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure)as data sources,relevant literature published from January 1,1999 to May 26,2025 was retrieved.A total of 1 147 valid documents(394 English,753 Chinese)were visually analyzed using CiteSpace 6.4.R1 software.This included analysis of the temporal characteristics of publication volume,author and institutional collaboration networks,as well as comparative studies of keyword co-occurrence,clustering(all Q values>0.3,all S values>0.7),timeline dynamic evolution,and keyword bursts.Results:Chinese literature publication volume showed a significant growth trend in the past decade(reaching 90 articles in 2024),while English literature publication volume stabilized after 2007(peaking at 38 articles in 2021).Core issues identified in both Chinese and English literature include three aspects:research subjects were predominantly focused on nursing,with insufficient attention paid to multidisciplinary talents such as clinical medicine and rehabilitation therapy;author and institutional collaboration networks were loose,and a medical-education collaboration model had not yet been formed;significant regional disparities existed,with higher research activity in developed countries and China's first-tier cities.Hotspot comparisons revealed that Chinese literature focuses on the integration of medical and elderly care,industry-education integration,smart elderly care,and policy-driven personnel team building,whereas English literature emphasized long-term care,end of life care,advance care planning,and service quality assessment.Conclusions:Training personnel for elderly care services is a crucial link in addressing population aging.The differences and frontier trends in Chinese and English literature revealed by this study can provide important references for China to build a localized,multidisciplinary,and medically-educationally integrated elderly care personnel training system,thereby facilitating the high-quality development of elderly care services.

赵绍昂;钟玉依;胡子怡;毛芮;王菲;王施懿;王思璠

河北医科大学医学影像学院,河北 050000河北医科大学基础医学院河北医科大学公共卫生学院河北医科大学基础医学院河北医科大学基础医学院河北医科大学基础医学院河北医科大学医教协同与医学教育研究中心

养老服务人才培养文献计量学医养结合产教融合

elderly care servicepersonnel trainingbibliometricsintegration of medical and elderly careindustry-education integration

《护理研究》 2026 (9)

1507-1518,12

河北省高等学校科学研究计划项目(人文社科类)青年基金项目,编号:QN2025696

10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.09.011

评论